~by: Ravi Philemon~

the following is the transcript of my welcome speech at TOC’s Awards Night:

Thank you Mr Chiam See Tong and Mrs Lina Chiam for gracing our event as Guests of Honour. Thank you to our friends, well-wishers, volunteers and readers of TOC. Without your goodwill and support TOC would not have reached this milestone.
What do I say on an occasion such as this? I think it will be apt to remember some important events from the past five years.
The former chief editor and one of the founders of TOC in remembering why TOC started says, “In those days the media and the government were always slamming netizens. Ya, even in those days they were discrediting it.” So the name The Online Citizen was coined to say that even if we are online, we are still citizens – so stop slamming us.
TOC was started after the 2006 General Election on 1 December 2006, because of the unfair coverage by the mainstream media of the opposition.
By 2007, we had grown to a certain level. When TOC’s then deputy editor Gerald Giam wrote about Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s son, Li Hongyi contravening Singapore Armed Force’s general orders, Reuters highlighted that several blogs have emerged as an alternative source of information for the city-state’s internet savvy population, over pro-government newspapers.
In 2008, activism became more firmly entrenched in the DNA of TOC. TOC being part of the ‘Bloggers 13′, submitted a proposal to Minister for Information, Communication and Arts, to deregulate the internet. 2008 was also the year TOC took to Speakers’ Corner to protest the public transport fare hike.
2009 was the coming of age of TOC. When we covered the AWARE saga, our servers crashed a few times.  It was also the year we started speaking up for and campaigning against the mandatory aspect of the death penalty.
In 2010, TOC started speaking up for the homeless and the people with disabilities, and the issues we highlighted were considered important enough to be brought up and discussed in Parliament. Of course the Government would still not mention TOC by name, but chided ‘irresponsible websites’ for spreading falsehoods online.
In 2010, TOC also organised the ‘Face to Face’ dialogue with political party leaders. The People’s Action Party representative was conspicuously absent in this dialogue.
2011 was probably the most momentous year for TOC. It started with the Prime Minister gazetting TOC as a political association saying TOC has the potential to influence the opinions of their readership and shape political outcomes in Singapore; and ended with the Law and Foreign Affairs Minister commenting that what TOC had published on a certain issue was quite false.
From 2006 to 2011, if there is a familiar stance that the Government had adopted about TOC and the socio-political blogosphere in general, it is that it is irresponsible, that we are the lunatic fringe and that our articles are false.
But despite these characterisations, TOC has grown all thanks to our volunteers, well-wishers and readers.
In 2011, we covered the General Election organised the ‘Face to Face 2′ with the all the Presidential candidates, covered the Presidential Election, and took to the Speakers’ Corner to protest the MRT disruptions and to call for, among other things, for the CEO of SMRT to resign.
I really do not know if TOC will last another 5 years. It is extremely difficult to keep a volunteer run entity like TOC going, especially with the slamming we keep receiving and the high expectations of our readers.
If we are to keep going and growing, we would at least need to go semi-professional, and for that we will need funds.
But one thing we promise our well-wishers and readers – we will continue to be a community of Singaporeans, and to be a voice for the voiceless for as long as we can.
Thank you.

More updates from the night and video coming soon.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Can Tan Chuan-Jin be expected to serve as an unbiased Speaker of Parliament?

After Speaker of Parliament Tan Chuan-Jin apologized for an offensive remark about Assoc Prof Jamus Lim, it raises uncertainty about his ability to maintain impartiality towards all MPs, as his role requires.

High Court waves away 377A controversy

The following is an excerpt from Yawning Bread Alex Au/ In a…

内政部拟修改交通法令 违规驾驶刑罚或加重

在修改公路交通法令的建议中指出,被判罪严重违反交通规矩的驾驶者,可能面对更严重的刑罚。 内政部今天(2月21日)指出,严重的违法行为包括了驾驶者严重违规的驾驶行为,和造成他人蒙受严重伤害,将会被判处更长的监禁和更昂贵的罚款。 糟糕的驾驶行为包括了酒后驾驶,以及没有通行权下超车。 分成危险和粗心驾驶 内政部建议将不负责任的违规驾驶行为区分成危险驾驶和粗心驾驶,,在进一步依据所造成的伤害效果,细分成四个类型。 内政部表示,虽然危险驾驶和粗心驾驶,与刑事法典中的轻率行为和疏忽行为相对应,但是这两种罪行的最高刑罚都会比刑事法典所规定的最高刑期更长,罚款更高。就以危险驾驶来说,一旦定罪,最高刑期可以从5年增加到8年;若导致死亡或严重伤害,最低刑期为期1年。 若被定罪为粗心驾驶,并导致伤者死亡,最高刑期将从原本的2年增加到3年。犯罪者也将面对最低强制性惩罚。 内政部兼国家发展部高级政务次长孙雪玲指出,“尽管我们的执法和教育了,仍然有驾驶者进行危险行为的驾驶或乘坐交通工具,如反方向驾驶、在没有发出警示或讯号灯的情况下转弯” 。 她今早主持在公路安全园举行的“2019提高公路意识,加强交通安全” 活动启动仪式时,作出上述宣布。 重犯处罚加倍…

【冠状病毒19】新增社区病例 家属上月才从印度返新

8月2日新增的唯一社区病例,与早前从印度返新的确诊家属有关。 这名新增社区病例是33岁女性永久居民。她的一名13岁男亲属,在上月从印度返新。基于男童未成年,为此这名女子要求与男童一同在隔离设施,履行居家通知,不料在隔离期间出现症状,后接受检测。 至于新增五例入境病例,包括两名为持工作证件印度男子,他们分别在7月19日和21日,从印度返回新加坡。 还有两名持直属亲属证的人士。48岁日籍女子和27岁印度女子,分别在上月21日抵达新加坡。以及一名持学生证印尼女子,在上月19日抵境。 他们在抵达新加坡后,就履行居家通知,并接受冠病检测,但只有一人出现症状。