The following is a letter from a TOC reader on issues raised during Prime Minister’s National Day Rally 2011 speech in English

Bill Tng/

I like to raise some issues that I like all Singaporeans to discuss that are pointed out by the PM during his National Day Rally Speech in English. I will keep my points short.

Pt 2: “Took bold decisive move with several measures such as the Resilience Package and the Jobs credit.”

The Resilience Package was enacted with funds from the National Reserves. Why was it that previous packages did not touch the reserves at all? How were the previous attempts funded? How much is the drawdown on our reserves now after the application of the funds for the Resilience package?

Jobs credit policy. Good to have however this Jobs credit policy is applied across the board so that companies can hire either P.Rs, work permit holders and local Citizens. How much can this Jobs Credit help locals then and if this Jobs Credit is only applicable to locally owned businesses or does it include foreign owned ones too? We depend on foreign companies too and foregin talents so yes, this policy should not discriminate but i just feel that it disadvantaged local citizens again from getting jobs.

Pt 10: “Government will reach out to all segments of society?”

Question is, does the Gov really listen and debate with us? So far they have started to do so and I sincerely hope they continue as well. More importantly, the Government needs to be transparent in their dealings. I urge the Government to have a Freedom of Information act like so many civilised coutnries does.

Pt 12: “Engagement online… unfortunately medium lends itself to many negative views and ridiculous untruths”

Very true that online tends to create monsters of lies and untruths. Yet the Government’s tendency to be tight-lipped about their explanations, reasons and lack of transparency in many issues and the lack of the Freedom of information act lends itself to such creations of negative views and untruths. So it is really on the ONUS of the government to be honest and open with us as citizens to counter such negativity and untruths rather than outright censorship.

Pt 15: “Yellow Ribbon Project” (The project to rehabilitate ex-offenders and lower re-offence rate)

Nothing mentioned about the death penalty in Singapore. I know we had such debates before but we still need to have it. Just because we had debated before does not mean the book is closed.

Pt 21:”Look forward to many more examples of active citizenship”

Yes, after this GE, you can  very much bet on us being more active. But at the same time, Government must realize not every citizen will be on the PAP side.  There will be much activity going on the opposition side so the establishment must be civil and work together with opposition groups.

Pt 22 – 24: “Singaporeans first”, Äll our policies are to benefit Singaporeans”, “Will not repeat explanations”

Again, there is a failure on the part of the Government for empathy. Yes the net result of the immigration policies is of some benefit to Singapore as it does top up the population since our baby population fails to catch up with rate of death but  the Government should repeat explanations and debate it further. Again, just because it was debated before does not mean we should not close the books on it.

Pt 25 – 30: “Housing”

HDB flats are getting to be at near parity with market rates. Building more HDB flats is a component to reduce that spike but the having private property fluctuations for what is essentially a government ministry built flat is wrong. There should be serious considerations for what is essentially tax payer funded housing projects being sold on the market like private properties.

Pt 31 – 39: University education

It is good to have lots of foreign students but please make sure that the professors are well-trained and not censored as well to provide good, all aorund education that is free from Government/ religious propaganda. I like to have the number of Polytechnic graduates going to Universities increased because i think Poly grads are just as smart and intelligent enough to make it in University.

Pt 40 – 50 : “Jobs”

We need foreign workers because lets face it, how many Singaporeans are willing to work as menial workers? We also need highly skilled foreigners as VPs, Managers because they bring in needed outside experience and knowhow. We do need middle scale foreign talents too. The key issue here is that we Singaporeans realize very much so that we do need foreigners. But as we do not have any form of minimum wage to level the playing field or some other ways, Singaporeans are viewed as more expensive to hire. Even the workers levy is not enough to compensate because in a financial year, the foreign worker levy only makes a small dent in the employer compared to a more expensive citizen as a worker. If we can implement some policy like minimum wage or some other alternative that can level the playing field, then we Singaporeans can compete based on merits alone and not how much wages we demand compared to a foreign talent.

This is one key issue that is touched on by many other articles elsewhere and in TOC so I will not elaborate here.

Pt 57: healthcare or rather Outpatient Medical Treatment”

Seniors needs lots of help here. yes the families are helping but they can only do so much in these tough economic times. Yet I do realize we should not become like the welfare states either. Still, the government I feel can afford to subsidized further medical and healthcare costs not only for the seniors but also make it more affordable to a broad segment of the population, not just lower income groups too.

Lastly, Pt 65 – 73: “Building our Singapore”

Especially Point 72 about building the sense of being Singaporean, or ownership and belonging. For us to feel that we belong, we have to have the sense of enagagement, that our voices are heard. Having a vibrant and diverse political scene instead of a one party system can allow us to have that otherwise it always feels like a dictatorship. reducing the power of the Seditious Act, the Internal Security Act to allow more free speeches and diverse political opinions to be aired can allow us to feel like we can chart Singapore towards a future together. So again, I urge all Singaporeans to make sure that we continue to vote in greater number of opposition candidates so that we can have greater freedoms and a greater say in our future as Singaporeans.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

From Hong Lim Park to Speakers’ Corner – 15 years to be made?

By Howard Lee So Speakers’ Corner turned 14 years old on 1…

拒邀性少数维权份子主讲 圣若瑟副校长:行动主义导致社会分裂

圣若瑟书院副校长陈顺德(译音)认为,行动主义推动社会变革,会造成社会群体的分裂。 在本月20日,跨大学LGBT网络研究与宣传总监Racheal Yeo,原受邀在圣若瑟书院举行的TEDx青年讲座主讲,却在最后一分钟被腰斩。 此事也引来数家新加坡网媒如本社、“椰子网”和“独立网”报导,引起网民关注国内性少数群体(LGBTQ+)在一些主流场合持续被排挤、歧视的情况。 根据日前他向天主教学校学生一次致词的录音音频,陈顺德解释为何该校最后一刻拒绝邀请性少数维权份子Racheal Yeo。 他呼吁学生们认清,将来他们学成踏入社会,言行将对周遭人产生影响,必须谨言慎行。 “可能是五个人、500人甚至5千人,就像成为公共服务署长的圣若瑟校友,旗下统领6万下属,包括我。他的言行将影响6万人,乃至百万新加坡人,对吗?就如副总理张志贤,也是我们的校友,其职务亦举足轻重。“ 他劝谕学生在面对眼前时局,应抱持谨慎心态。希望学生们离开圣若瑟时,已准备好面对、成为有能力领导、作出影响力的角色。 陈顺德为校方最后一刻拒绝邀请Racheal Yeo辩解,后者乃LGBTQ性少数群体的社运份子,捍卫性少数群体权益。他希望学生们厘清“行动主义”(activism)的定义,以及它是否适用于新加坡社会情境。 冀学生以“和平方式”推动社会变革…

Kenneth Jeyaretnam co-opted into Reform Party CEC

He hopes to carry on late father and party founder’s legacy.

Asia's fastest data cable links Tokyo to Singapore

By BBC/Katia Moskvitch – A new high-speed undersea data cable has opened…