Tan Meng Lee

Yesterday (Sunday, 29 May 2011) was the Workers’ Party’s “Thank You Luncheon” for its volunteers at Ban Heng Restaurant at HarbourFront Centre (off Telok Blangah Road).

Even though I only know a handful of the volunteers (that’s because I did so very little for WP after Nomination Day in Apr), there was an easy camaraderie with the rest of the 500-odd invitees.  That was especially nice as we relived a little of the sweet and hard-won victory.

The luncheon event was billed to start from 11am and end by 3pm.  So, not wanting to be kiasee and kiasu, I arrived at 12:40pm.  Of course, by then, the WP 50th Anniversary Commemorative book was all given out.  Woeful little me did a mental kick-ass on my royal posterior (if you can imagine my supine contortion) as I started to ask around to see if anyone could spare me a copy (well, you see, some were holding multiple copies!) and I got one eventually after some badgering – Yeh!  Great compilation, tracing Workers’ Party pedigree from the Labour Front days, with photos of the other illustrious Son of Singapore, Mr David Saul Marshall, our first Chief Minister in 1955 during our fledging break from our British colonial masters.

Mr Low and all the other WP MPs, NCMPs and GE candidates were mingling around with the supporters.   There were two queues at the front of the dining area – one for Mr Chen Show Mao and another for Mr Pritam Singh.  These two gentlemen were standing at the front of the dining hall, posing for photos and obliging with autographs on the commemorative book.

As the queue for Mr Chen was so long, I went around to collect autographs on my precious commemorative book from Ms Sylvia Lim, Mr Low, Mr Mohd Faisal, Mr Yaw Shin Leong, Mr Gerald Giam, etc, and chatted a little with each of them. But Mr Chen’s queue wasn’t getting any shorter although it wasn’t as overwhelming as earlier.  By then, my tum-tum was protesting a little.  But there are priorities in life, eh?  Food later, autograph first.  So I joined Mr Chen’s line which was stretching to about the third row of tables.

Just as it was nearing my turn, Mr Chen asked the couple in front of me if he could be excused as he wanted to talk to some people.  As I am the type who can never find an empty taxi on a rainy day, I thought to myself: Hmmmm what else is new?  Guess what, Mr Chen was scurrying to the back of the queue to thank the guests for their patience and apologizing for the long wait.  That’s when I realized the line was extending to the fifth row of tables by then.  In a whizz, Mr Chen was literally bouncing back to his photo spot, throwing decorum to the wind as he sprinted!

Well, whaddayou know???  Do you reckon any PAP MP would have 1/5th of Mr Chen’s EQ to:

(i) notice the lengthening queue whilst being engrossed in interacting with the photo-taking guests at the time, and

(ii) do such a thoughtful gesture for those at the back of the queue?

This was WITHOUT any prompting by an aide or any assistance by such aide to proffer such apologies on his behalf.  It all came from the heart of this one man!

The only occasion when you can see a PAP MP run is when they are running away from yapping small dogs snarling and sniping at their multi-million dollar ankles!  [That small dog deserves a medal for being so smart when it came to Minister Liu Tuck Yew’s ankles, ugh?]

Now, is Mao-Mao a S.N.A.G. (Sensitive New Age Guy) or what???

Quite honestly, whilst I was initially impressed by Mr Chen’s credentials and the astute comments and points he made at various interviews and election speeches, which were highly resonant with me, even I thought the public adulation (bordering on adoration) for Mr Chen was a tad overdone.  I couldn’t quite understand the “phenomenon” because – from my quiet observation of YouTube videos that included Mr Chen – the guy distinctly and consistently downplayed himself.

In fact, I admired Mr Chen for what he did NOT do despite his “star” public attraction.  In the Nomination Day YouTube video, I noted that he was nudging Mohd Faisal towards centre-front to be closer to Mr Low.  He was always mindful to be way down the line after Mr Low or Ms Lim in terms of pecking order and was careful to walk behind them.  At GE rally finales, he would be standing to one corner rather than near the front-centre.

Post-GE, in another YouTube video that showed the PAP team driving round in a mini-truck, waving thanks to residents, the PAP drive-by happened to coincide with the WP candidates having a meeting at the void deck.  The other WP candidates waved back at the PAP with a wisecrack comment on the video about saying goodbye to PAP.  Mr Chen didn’t wave to the PAP even though his WP colleagues did so and he studiously gazed at the papers spread on the void deck table.

On yet another point – I may be wrong as I’m purely speculating here.  I reckon that one of the reasons for Mr Chen to return to Singapore is to help his sister take care for his ageing parents.  From Facebook postings, his parents appear to be in good health.  But in the twilight years of our elders, downside potential is higher than upside potential with each advancing year.

With Mr Chen’s credentials and wealth from his years as a high-profile M&A corporate lawyer with a top US law firm and his linguistic skills, Mr Chen can easily settle in the US, Switzerland or any other First-World country or some upshot gated community in China or charming rustic town in Indonesia.  So comments about Mr Chen returning home now that Singapore enjoys one of the highest GDP per capita are thoughtlessly spurious.

For Mr Chen to then step-up to the plate for Singapore by joining an opposition party as an underdog with little resources and battling on a most uneven playing field constantly skewed by the dominant PAP already speaks volumes.

That is a moral high road much harder even to walk.  And yet ……and for what, do you think?

Now, to continue my story. After the couple in front of me, it was my turn. Mr Chen broke into a big smile as he greeted me warmly and addressed me by my blog pseudonym.  I was astounded – most pleasantly so!

It is easy to laud and help the strongest (eg, giving a scholarship to the brightest who may not have the financial resources to go to a top university).  It is that much harder to help the weakest (eg, helping to pay the fees of a repeated secondary school failure).  That’s likely the ultimate measure of a person’s sense of goodness.

For all of the above, Mr Chen – to me – is not just a S.N.A.G., not just the perfect gentleman ….. but I reckon another true Son of Singapore – as time will tel..

I wish Mr Chen and all the WP MPs, NCMPs, GE candidates and members all the best.  I hope the PAP will give WP the space and play fair, and we as citizens give WP the space to do what’s more important – on both national and municipal electoral issues,  for our country and our future.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

单亲妈妈因欠杂费遭扣10小时 马西岭-油池市镇会:是法庭发拘捕令

日前,因无力缴付累计18个月、逾两千元总计的市镇会杂费(S&CC)的单亲妈妈,被警方扣留将近10个小时,引起网民关注,马西岭-油池市镇理事会随即向媒体澄清,是法庭因该母亲未遵照强制令出席审讯的情况下,而发出拘捕令。 社运人士吴家和于脸书发文称,该单亲妈妈共积欠马西岭-油池市镇会高达2150新元,包括杂费、罚款和法律费用的欠款。 对于为何会欠下高额费用而言,吴家和解释单亲妈妈是一名月收入仅1000元的促销员,即便每月159元分期付款方式缴付杂费欠费,都感到力不从心。若过了缴款期限,市镇会向她发出一份法律通知,约200元左右,这无形增加她的欠款负担。 市镇会:主动联系安排分期付款 对此,市镇会称,市镇会曾为了防止法庭向她发出逮捕令,曾主动联系单亲妈妈,劝她与市镇会联系并安排分期付款,让当局能够撤销法律诉讼。市镇会于2016年12月至2017年10月期间,共向单亲妈妈发出六次通知书,提醒她还款;于2016年8月和2017年7月期间也曾到访单亲妈妈的家中进行家访。 市镇会也表示,该单亲妈妈后来还了部分欠款,于2017年12月同意以分期付款的方式清还剩下的欠款,而当局也在同日撤销法律诉讼。同时,该单亲妈妈于去年11月签订最新的分期付款协议,使得她在偿还欠款同时,也能继续支付每月的杂费。 针对此事,市镇会提醒居民,若在缴付杂费方面遇到困难,应该及早联系市镇会寻求解决方法,以免欠款会越滚越多。 回溯去年3月,国家法院曾计划推出一系列措施,对于违反市镇会条例如拖欠服务与杂费等,鼓励市镇会选择“非提控”的方式处理,并希望市镇会与居民交涉,刑事诉讼才是最后途径。 面对那些拖欠服务与杂费以及违反市镇理事会条例的居民,市镇会往后在把他们传控上庭之前,必须先跟对方交涉尝试解决问题,采取刑事诉讼应被视为最后途径。 除了上述个案,还有居民因为拖欠区区122元五角钱的杂费(S&CC),被宏茂桥市镇会透过律师所发出律师信,追讨杂费。

行人过马路看手机要被罚?警澄清没这回事!

针对网络谣传,行人过马路看手机可能会违法,警方澄清,行人过马路时使用手机其实并不违法,但出于安全考量,并不建议行人在过马路时使用手机。 日前网络上流传一则以中英文信息的截图,文内表示, “新加坡交通规则修正。从今天(1/12/2019)开始行人在过马路时边使用手机将可以被罚高达1000新元”,引起网民关注。 对此,警方于脸书上澄清并无此事,但也提醒民众,在过马路时需要保持警惕,注意自己和其他行人的安全。 “我们建议行人在过马路时避免使用手机,因为使用手机会分散他们的注意力。行人在路上必须时刻保持警惕,顾及个人与其他使用道路者的安全”,警方表示。 让路紧急服务车辆 由于信息内提及12月1日刚修订的高级驾驶理论(Highway Code),警方也在脸书中强调,高级驾驶理论的三项重要修订,包括过马路时避免使用手机,并遵守交通标志与规则、让路给紧急服务车辆、正确使用个人代步工具。 2018年,共有887名行人因交通意外受伤,其中39人因此而失去生命,因此有关当局才需要行人在使用道路时,提高警惕,保护自己与其他人的生命安全。 此外,高级驾驶理论表示,未能及时让位给紧急服务车辆的驾驶者,将可被处以最高200元的罚款,并扣除4分;个人代步工具则需要在规定的道路上限速行驶,并鼓励民众以安全有序的方式使用工具。 据总检察署网站,高级驾驶理论仅是一系列行为准则,不算是交通法令摘要,旨在强调道路使用者之间的相互责任。 因此,警方呼吁民众勿随意散播未经证实的信息,民众也可上有关当局网站查询证实消息来源。

44-yr-old Singaporean arrested and detained under ISA for terrorism-related activities

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has announced that a 44-year-old Singaporean…

Blood donors in Sweden get a text telling them when their blood has been used to help someone

Sweden has rolled out several interesting new initiatives to tackle shortages of…