Joseph Teo/

In the Straits Times on Thursday 12 May 2011, on page A4, “Cynthia Phua promises proper handover”, the following was reported:

“Aljunied Town Council is now managed by CPG Facilities Management, with whom the town council signed a three-year contract last year.  CPG managing director Jeffrey Chua is the town council’s general manager.  As the town council managing agent, CPG engages the services of other companies for services such as cleaning, maintenance and lift rescue.”

While CPG Corporation Pte Ltd is the corporatized and renamed Public Works Department, it is not apparent whether Mr Chua, as the Managing Director of CPG Facilities Management Pte Ltd holds shares or options in the firm CPG Facilities Management Pte Ltd (which appears to be a subsidiary of CPG Corporation Pte Ltd) or its parent.

Regardless, I find it difficult to understand how Mr Chua can carry out both his duties as the general manager of the town council, and the Managing Director of the town council’s managing agent.

Suppose Mr Chua, the Managing Director of CPG Facilities Management asked for a higher management fee, in order to deal with the rise in the foreign workers’ levy,  would Mr Chua the general manager of Aljunied Town Council grant that request?

If the town upkeep is poor, and HDB blocks are dirty, would Mr Chua the general manager of Aljunied Town Council replace himself as the managing agent?

It appears that there is a conflict of interest in Mr Chua’s roles.  If he receives a stipend or salary from both organizations, on whose behalf would he act?  If he only receives a salary from CPG Facilities Management, how can he then act in the interest of the residents of Aljunied GRC?

What I find extremely worrying, however, is that this matter only came to light because the Workers’ Party won Aljunied GRC, and there now needs to be a handover.  If the PAP had won, would this unhealthy arrangement have continued?  Are there any other such apparent conflicts of interest that we do not know about?


Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

拨款预算增24巴仙 移民局新柔长堤关卡仍面对人手不足问题

昨日,移民局发文告,解释新柔长堤上周末交通塞爆,主要是发生虚报炸弹事件、汽车抛锚和驾车人士胡乱插队造成。 许多网民也到移民局脸书抱怨,在关卡出入境大排长龙,一些网民指出,移民局并没有开放更多柜台,来疏导缓慢和拥堵的通关情况。 在誌期19日的声明中,移民局则指出上周末因为有驾驶者插队而导致拥堵情况加剧;此外,还有车子抛锚、虚报诈弹事件等。 “移民局官员全天候工作,尽最大努力确保民众能安全通关。”文告称,由于职员换班和调派人手到交通流量更高的区域,为此有些关卡将暂时关闭。 换言之,移民局默认了一些柜台“因为调派人手到高流量区域”而被迫“暂时关闭”,并没有足够人手来应对上述情况。 移民局预算比去年增加24巴仙 然而,在拨款给移民局的2017和2018预算对比下,可见政府已增加了移民局预算高达24巴仙。在2017年预算,拨款给移民和关卡监控项目的预算是为8亿1789万3800元。 在今年的预算则提升到10亿1416万2300元,增加了1亿9626万8500元: 虽然增加了24巴仙的预算,移民局在面对高峰时期,仍必须暂时关闭部分柜台,“把人手调派到更高交通流量的区域”。 这意味着,即使提升了近两亿元的预算,移民局仍无法有效供应充足的人手和资源,来缓解关卡拥堵的问题。民众有必要质问,移民局如何使用增加的近两亿元拨款?  

Temasek’s largest shareholdings plunged S$34.24 billion in three months

The equity shareholdings of Temasek Holdings Pte (Temasek) and its subsidiaries have…

Trial against American behind Singapore’s HIV Registry data leak commences

Mikhy Farrera Brochez, the American charged with leaking sensitive and confidential information…

S’pore Health Minister says share of national health expenditure increased to 46% but doesn’t say it’s far below OECD’s avg

In Parliament on Friday (5 Mar), Health Minister Gan Kim Yong assured…