From the Workers’ Party website [picture TOC’s].

The PAP has circulated a political leaflet to all households containing accusations that “the WP is against LUP, HIP and Other Upgrading” programmes. It cites a personal blog post by a WP candidate, Gerald Giam, written more than one-and-a-half years ago, and twists it around to accuse WP of being against HDB upgrading.

This is misleading and mischievous. It was distributed just before the close of the campaign period, leaving little time for WP to respond and set the record straight.

PAP’s accusation:

The WP is against LUP, HIP and Other Upgrading.


WP has never been against HDB upgrading programmes, especially the Lift Upgrading Programme (LUP). It is ludicrous for the Party to be against a programme that presents clear benefits to residents, like having lifts on every floor. Indeed, Hougang Town Council has spent substantial sums of money to help implement LUP in Hougang Town.

PAP’s accusation:

WP says prices of HDB flats should be kept low by keeping your flats looking old and without facilities.


The PAP has taken the words of one of its candidates out of context in its attempt to paint WP as being against upgrading. Why would WP, as a responsible party that cares about the welfare of residents, want their flats to look “old and without facilities”?

PAP’s accusation:

The WP says that those in public housing should not have “high class living environment”.


This has been twisted out of context again by the PAP. HDB flats cannot be expected to have all the expensive frills of condominiums, otherwise their prices may become even more unaffordable than they are now. We believe most Singaporeans readily accept this fact.


The PAP accusations are a cheap attempt to frighten voters into thinking that voting for WP will lead to a crash in housing prices. This is far from the truth.

WP is a responsible and rational party. We share many Singaporeans’ concern about the affordability of public housing. Our proposal to peg the price of new HDB flats to the median incomes of Singaporeans who qualify for those flats is aimed at ensuring that new flats are always affordable to Singaporeans, especially young couples who are buying their first home. It will not cause a crash in the value of existing flats.

All new Built-to-Order (BTO) flats overtime will become resale flats only after the 5 year minimum occupation period, and any moderate adjustments to lower the price of new flats will have little impact in the value of the resale flats. This is because these two markets operate independently, with different sets of eligibility criteria.

WP urges voters to read through its manifesto, which can be downloaded at, to appreciate the full context of our housing proposals.


View the leaflet in question here: English leaflet / Chinese leaflet.


Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Non-profit urges people to stop glorifying the elderly collecting cardboards as 'active ageing'

Non-profit foundation Happy People Helping People (HPHP) appealed to the public on…

占去年自杀人数三分之一 青年心理议题备受关注

20余岁群体占了去年自杀人数中的三分之一,引起人们关注,而政府部门和精神科专家计划着重为这群体人们寻觅良策,助他们渡过难关。 据新加坡援人协会(Samaritans of Singapore,简称SOS)最近一份报告指出,在2019年,有71名年龄介于20指29岁的年轻人自杀身亡,占据了去年死亡率的三分之一。他们主要因为无法负荷人生转化阶段的生活压力,才选择上这不归路。 政府部门指出,他们密切关注国家的自杀率,关注到年轻人或许面临更大风险的原因。 据新加坡社会及家庭发展部、卫生部和教育部所发出的联合文告指出,“在20至29岁的青少年时期,他们都在完成教育、觅职或创业、和建立家庭的阶段。在人生的各个阶段,这些过渡和变化都可能带来很大的压力和不稳定性” 。 多重生活变化或成压力源头 SOS所做出的人口统计,引起心理学家对20余岁群体的自杀风险考察。 据Inner Light Psychological…

接居家通知仍四度外出 男子遭撤销永久居民资格

出现急性呼吸道症状,被令履行居家通知,一名47岁男子却四度违例外出,结果遭移民与关卡局撤销永久居民资格! 去年4月29日,住在裕廊西一间宿舍的Chong Tet Choe,曾因身体疼痛和咳嗽求医,医生诊断有现急性呼吸道症状,给了他五天病假,等同居家通知,除非是就医否则不能随意外出。 不过,他仍在隔日、5月2日和3日,曾四次外出,包括到公共食堂打包、还去近的AXS机器给手机充值。调查初期,他还告知卫生部自己仅出外一次。直到当局发现他出入宿舍的指纹记录,才坦承另外三次出行。 去年8月7日,他因触犯传染病法令遭判监禁;并在昨日遭移民关卡局撤销永久居民资格。 违反居家通知规定者,可面对高达1万元的罚款,或监禁半年,或两者兼施。