Stephanie Chok /

As a mother-to-be and eligible voter, I am, for the first time, considering a) who to cast my vote for, and b) ‘my child’s future’.

This is the PAP’s ongoing mantra – vote for us, think of your children’s future and your grandchildren’s future, not to mention your assets and property values and job opportunities.

Well, I have been thinking hard about my child’s future, and the sort of Singapore I would like him to experience and fully participate in as he grows up. I have also been thinking about the norms that he will be exposed to, that will have the ability to shape his formation as a young adult. I have also been considering what sort of lessons our current socio-political landscape will be teaching him (and it discomforts me greatly).

I would like my son – yes, it’s a boy, says the doctor – to respect leaders for their integrity, dedication to service and commitment to justice that is not bereft of compassion.

I would like him to be steered by courageous leadership, one that does not succumb to easy appeals to greed and fear in order to secure votes, but inspires him to rise above self-centredness to support decisions that may, potentially, cause him some temporary discomfort, but may ultimately result in a more humane alternative to the current ‘catch up or die’ development model.

I would very much like my child to be able to speak his mind respectfully yet fearlessly if he disagrees with the status quo, without having to hover in the background to remind him: ‘Be careful, son!’ (And then give a long and somber lecture about the existence of the Internal Security Act and how it has been abused in the past to silence and intimidate persons who disagreed and tried to challenge the system.)

I want him to grow up learning that loyalty should be earned, not bought. That if he was ever to become a politician, or even a team leader in his school or manager of a company, that his key strategy should not be to induce obedience through a coercive combination of threats and bribes. If my son wins – a competition, a promotion, an election – I would like to be proud of how he won it through a ‘clean fight’. That he won the respect of others who have selected him because of his capabilities, his potential, his sincere desire to serve others.

I would like my son to appreciate humility and its power to move others. Genuine humility, that comes from admitting to human frailties and mistakes and taking responsibility for them. Humility that is demonstrated by listening with sincerity to others with differing – even opposing – views, without being dismissive, patronizing or bullying them into silence.

I would like my child to grow up in a country where the ‘good life’ is not merely characterized by GDP growth, but by the measure in which fellow citizens protect and care for each other, particularly the most vulnerable amongst us. I look forward to him being part of a country where he could, without being a Presidents Scholar, or even a degree holder, be recognized and valued for whatever skills and talents he possesses. I want him to work in a country where he could excel in a trade if he so chooses – e.g. carpentry, bricklaying, horticulture – and be paid a decent, living wage for an honest day’s work, a wage where he could afford to get married, buy a comfortable (not necessarily luxurious) home and raise a family.

I want my child to be convinced that in this society, there is no shame or crime in being different, that it is important to think critically, imaginatively, and boldly – that the road to success is not through memorizing model answers or mindlessly filling in the blanks with droll answers provided by judicious instructors. I hope that he can flourish within an education system that genuinely fosters creativity, spontaneity and sparks of harmless mischief, and doesn’t kill enthusiasm for subjects/curricula not perceived as ‘profitable’ – e.g. philosophy and literature, as opposed to engineering or accounting.

I want my child to grow up with a healthier understanding and experience of democracy than I have. I want him to experience a Singapore where it is not accepted as ‘normal’ for Members of Parliament to hold on to their positions for years – even decades – without having ever been voted in; where ‘live’ debates between politicians of different parties over pertinent policy issues are a regular feature; where civil liberties such as freedom of assembly and expression and the right to information are not treated as ‘luxuries’ but recognized as the fundamental rights of mature citizens.

I want him to be able to experience the dynamism of an egalitarian society at its best – one where persons fight fearlessly to protect the principles of truth and justice, yet never forget the beauty of mercy and gentleness.

But most of all, I do not want my child, when he is 21 and no longer a child, but an adult about to vote himself, to ask me, perhaps with some measure of disappointment, maybe resentment, or possibly despair: ‘Mom, why didn’t any of you do anything?’

I am 38 years old this year, and I can finally vote.

And because I’m thinking of my child’s future, I know exactly what I want to say come 7 May 2011 at my local polling station.

————–

Picture from Hands On Communication.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

New green building masterplan is in the works as part of climate mitigation strategy

The Building and Construction Authority (BCA) and the Singapore Green Building Council…

议员促加强打击不公聘雇歧视问题

人力部自2016年开始,加强打击不公平聘雇现况,目前已将约600家涉及对本国求职者歧视而拒绝招聘的企业列入监督名单,并拒绝了2300个就业准证申请。 昨日(4日),议员安迪(碧山—大巴窑集选区)要求当局提高就业准证的审批标准资格,对此人力部兼国家发展部政务部长扎吉哈在国会表示,为能加强打击不公平聘雇问题,采取削减工作上的优待让企业受到冲击,影响他们的雇佣能力。 安迪:新加坡人的福祉优先 此外,劳资政公平与良好雇佣联盟(TAFEP)则是鼓励企业改善企业文化。据悉,目前许多被列入公平考量框架监督名单的企业已开始聘雇本地专业人员、经理、执行人员和技师(PMET),共3800人。 而原先列入监督名单的610家公司中,其中就有260家企业经调整改善后,脱离监督名单。 另一方面,安迪促请议会应对加强力度打击职场年龄歧视与国籍歧视,他表示,“我们不能持续在缺乏考虑新加坡人的核心福祉下,开放外国人才不断流入,打击他们的工作机会。“ 因此他建议,提高现有3600元的就业准证最低薪金,以及直接公开不遵守公平考量框架的企业名单,以儆效尤。 对此扎吉哈回应,目前获工作准证的员工必须接受定期审查,而最后一次的标准调整则是在2017年。 他举例,3600元的最低工资标准是适用在年轻的毕业生身上,但一名年过40的,有经验的工作准证持有人,应该需要达到更高的标准,甚至是与本地白领阶级平齐。 扎吉哈也表明,政府必须在本地员工与维持我国竞争力中保持“微妙的平衡“,目前大部分工作准证持有者的职位是本地人也可以胜任的。 今年3月,政府公布一份公平考量框架监督名单,该监督名单是在2014年8月研拟,旨在加强以国人为主的劳动力核心,并确保企业在招聘时更公平、优先录用国人。 当时人力部长杨莉明指出,已有350家企业因为未能遵循公平原则录用本地求职者,将其列入公平考量框架监督名单。…

中年雇员占本地劳动力六成 尚达曼鼓励雇主续聘用

国务资政兼社会政策统筹部长尚达曼坦言,本地劳动力队伍中,有60巴仙都是年龄40岁或以上的雇员。为此政府仍积极协助他们就业,包括鼓励雇主雇佣这批中年工友群体。 他指出,尽管当中一些中年工友学历不高,但刻苦耐劳且多年来已积累宝贵工作经验,为此政府仍会确保他们能继续为国家贡献。 目前尚达曼领导全国就业理事会,在今晚(17日)的演说,他提及政府给予那些雇佣中年工友的雇主额外支持。 尚达曼强调政府需确保“没有国人被落在后头”,而当前当务之急,是为国人保住工作,确保失业者尽快返回职场等。 当前贸易和旅游业前景低迷,而政府与各领域企业合作,提供临时工作以及实习机会,让国人边工作、边学习新技能,为下一份工作做好准备。 强化社会流动性 尚达曼也指在全球爆发疫情前,一些国家就已出现社会分化现象,而我国需避免这种问题,为此,将继续确保国人有机会接受教育、掌握技能和找到好工作;为输在起跑点的国人提供支持,维持社会流动性。 https://web.facebook.com/gov.sg/videos/292041325179615/?v=292041325179615&external_log_id=e30a1790-0a5b-4317-b40a-0bd36cc26b8f&q=Tharman%20Shanmugaratnam  

【选举】陈立峰接替方荣发保卫后港 刘程强不参选

工人党非选区议员陈立峰,经证实接替现任议员方荣发,保卫该党堡垒区后港。 然而,陈硕茂和前党魁刘程强不参选本届选举。毕丹星是在今日记者会上分享有关消息。 1991年,刘程强力排万难成功攻下后港议席,打败原任议员陈原生。2011年,刘程强带领陈硕茂等人转战阿裕尼集选区,并拿下该党首个集选区。