PT Wong

Dear Straits Times,

I am 21 years old. And I read your papers almost everyday. I liked reading what you offered.

Yesterday in my school’s lecture on politics, we touched on the topic of Social Movement. I never would have thought Singaporeans have the capacity for “movements” until I straddled my presence between Buangkok and Hougang MRT yesterday, in an effort to catch the rallies given by two dominant parties in Singapore. I have to bear in mind, one is legitimately in rule, while the other have to fight on the sidelines, without the support of you and the dominant mass media networks, that is widely assumed as needs and legitimate sources in Singaporean homes.

credit: Aaron Lim

A Social Movement, indeed, was what I saw when I walked through the supporting crowd of the Workers’ Party. Never in my life in Singapore have I heard the voices of Singaporeans so clear and articulate. Yes, I was convinced that Singaporeans are talking. You should stop having this mindset that Singaporeans are apathetic. In case you still didn’t know it, I am informing you now. Go write about it. The Singaporeans want to be heard. But I guess you won’t. Because what Singaporeans are saying is what you dismiss as just a rowdy bunch of comments from a rowdy bunch of “uninformed and ignorant” Singaporeans – who didn’t know what the PAP had been doing for them. Mind you, your dismissal of their valuable comments make you yourself ignorant of what the united voice of Singaporeans are speaking.

At this point, I admit, you do look stupid. You sound a tat-bit senile to the massive crowd at the Workers’ Party rally, where you took a photograph of and placed in page A8. Every head you captured has a brain attached, and those brains must be thinking: Is that all you got out of the Workers’ Party rally? It is such an unmoving piece, from a moving social movement. It is not purely emotional as you claimed on the front page. There was some substance, if you were to observe and listen more. I juxtaposed your PAP coverage on page A4 with it, and I see so much more of your enthusiasm, in covering the uncalled-for responses of the wives of contesting MPs.

Honestly, what you covered on voices of the wives in the PAP rally are nothing – kosong – as compared to what you had missed out in covering the voices of the citizens in the WP rally. You didn’t cover how the PAP “crowd” was made up mostly of its own white-shirted people, who are somehow related to the people standing on stage. Almost none of the non-PAP Singaporeans who were there gave a “Majulah Singapura” roar when called to. And yet, you covered an MP wife’s comment that the crowd at PAP’s “responded to him… the response seems good.” Wait till you hear the comments at the Workers’ Party side! But wait… it was not covered.

When I read your coverage of the Worker’s Party rally, much of what I had just read was just another bunch of skewed words, based on the ideology of the PAP which defines what constitutes a “clean and fair fight”, and what does not. PAP calls the shots all the time. No wonder PAP says in Buangkok: “Where were the opposition parties for the past 10 years? They only come out during the elections, wanting you to vote for them.” Have PAP even given the opposition a chance to serve? Come on. They don’t even have the means to. Give them a break. Stop giving them double-standards. I find myself reading in mounting degrees of disgust as I flipped through the papers I spent 90 cents on.

I want to ask your journalists: What kind of education have they gone through? Have they been so PAP-brain-washed that they cannot even write a proper close-to-objective article without hinting the PAP manifesto? It’s sad that even the people’s papers, whose purpose was supposedly to report the truths as they were, went into their fair share of politics. I send my condolences to you, my dear Straits Times.

I am not pro-opposition. I stand as a citizen trying to make a decision in this elections which side I will be on. But I am saying that Straits Times, you should start waking up and write what citizens deserve to hear. Maybe you had been driving the vehicle too long and have become complacent too? Yours shouldn’t be a bunch of politically correct words. You should report truth, as it is. Uninterrupted.

This way, we will eliminate the possibility that PAP is playing dirty, with you.

Yours Faithfully,

PT Wong

 

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

民主党林文兴劝《海峡时报》 想与人民连结,须停止当政府传声筒

民主党林文兴表示,若《海峡时报》真的想要持续和人民连结,必须停止作为政府的传声筒。 上述言论是针对《海峡时报》的一篇报道,新加坡2020年大选:年轻选民对选举结果发挥至关重要的效应(Singapore GE2020: Signs of young voters’ crucial role in election outcome)作出的回应。…

徐顺全:人民先于营利、权益先于显贵、智慧先于财富

新加坡民主党秘书长徐顺全在上周六举办募款午宴,获得英华自主中学校友同窗踊跃支持。 在致词中,他阐述教育之重要,例如当看见国内年长者必须工作、收纸皮来保障下一餐温饱;当国家面对贫富不均、流浪者露宿街头、麦当劳,但总理自己仍领取高薪,他在英华学校所受的教育,唤起他的良知,深知不能坐视不管。 “当我们的公民被无审讯扣留、生理和心理上被侵害,我所受的教育不容许我保持沉默;当统治派系计划透过《防假消息法》勒紧对网络的困索,我所受的教育再次唤醒我。当总理和他的夫人自封为国家主权基金的监护者,我所受的教育激起我的愤怒。” 他形容,如果看见了这些,还选择当鸵鸟漠视保持沉默,有违自己在英华学校接受的教诲,只有站出来捍卫正义、为弱势发声和反抗那些打压者,才是教育之大义。 不过,他坦言,即便出席午宴的在座昔日同窗,如今都算是各领域的“精英”–医生、律师、飞机师、总裁等等,但是身为精英群体,与选择继续鼓吹精英主义,是有区别的,你可以选择走入基层扶起大家;或者在阶梯上抹上油膏,刻意让其他人更能往上爬,“但肯定后者绝不是我们母校的信条”。 他也认为,英华自主中学校训“精益求精”(The Best is Yet to Be)绝不是要大家踩着别人致富,而是让我们成为更好的自己,为别人挺身而出。 徐顺全也指责,在总理李显龙和其执政团队治下,对于创新发展的成绩乏善可陈,他认为权力集中在少数、从人民身上移走财富加之营造恐惧的分为,都使得国家的政经和知识发展被掣肘。…

The Sticker Lady – Perhaps the Law needs to be Reviewed

By Ghui – In many ways, we are a country in transition.…

Losing £billions in paper losses in StanChart, Temasek puts pressure on bank’s CEO

The UK-based Financial Times published an article yesterday reporting that Temasek Holdings…