Minglee Alsop-Lim

I need your urgent advice about employing a maid. As a busy mother, I need someone reliable to help out at home.

My maid has worked for me for a long time. Her mother worked for my parents and did an excellent job, so I had faith in her. For several years her performance has been very good, but recently she has become arrogant and insensitive, and is making lots of mistakes.

For example:

1) She flooded my kitchen – when I asked her about it, she told me that the drain pipe was blocked (she was supposed to clear it once a month but didn’t). Then she assured me that it is very rare and won’t happen again in the near future. Guess what? It flooded again within a year!

2) She didn’t close a window and my terrier dog escaped. I was so worried because he is dangerous and could bite lots of people. After the incident, she didn’t apologise and just shrugged her shoulders saying “What to do, it has happened.” Fortunately my neighbor found the dog and we locked it up again.

3) Without consulting me, she has been bringing strangers to work in my house. She says they charge low wages and keep costs down, but they make a lot of noise and rest on my bed. I think they even tried to seduce my husband. It stopped feeling like my home, more like a cheap hotel, and I don’t always want to come back at the end of the day.

4) When she first came to work for me, I instructed her to clean the different parts of the house at least once a week. But for some time she has stopped taking care of the bedrooms of PP and H; they are now dirty and messy. I asked why and she told me that the kids had been disobedient, so she was neglecting their bedrooms as a punishment (even though she is paid to clean all the rooms).

Even though my maid has worked for me for many years and I value what she has done in the past, I think she is now getting complacent. She ignores my comments and basically treats my feedback as “noise”. I wrote to the agency about her behavior; they assured me that they are the best agency around and all their maids are “Trained to Serve” – but it seems like pure rhetoric and I don’t see that in her actions. Her salary is much higher than maids in other countries, but the agency say this is to keep her honest and stop her moving to another employer. They say there is a limited supply of maids, and Singapore isn’t big enough for more than one good maid agency, so I should not trust their competitors.

I have to decide whether to renew my maid’s 5-year employment contract. When we discussed this she said that she is now part of a team, and if I want her I must also accept her friends doing part-time work for me. One friend is very inexperienced, can’t do basic tasks or explain what she intends to do. I suspect that she is actually underage. When interviewed, she only seemed interested in her days-off and visiting Universal Studios. When she couldn’t answer my questions, she stomped her feet and exclaimed, “I don’t know what to say!” But I am still expected to pay her a high salary.

Now there happens to be another maid agency that offered me some helpers who seem sincere, genuine and intelligent. They are keen to work, willing to assist me and have a good attitude. I know that they may take a bit of time to learn how everything works, but frankly I am inclined to give them a chance.

People say that the devil you know is better than the one you don’t. But I feel that I can’t tahan my current maid anymore. She seems to have forgotten that ultimately I am the one who pays her high salary. Do you think I should change maids ? Appreciate your advice.

Footnote: The above is a fictional story. When I sent the article out to my friends, all of them advised me to change my maid. Clearly we value having the competition of maid agencies in our personal lives – so why do we not want competition in the political arena? As “employers” of our parliamentarians, we would benefit from the competition of policy ideas. Ultimately, Singaporeans are the winners.

—————–

Cartoon from My Sketchbook.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【选举】指武吉巴督工地缺乏防范措施 徐顺全:穆仁理在哪里?

新加坡民主党秘书长徐顺全博士日前指出,武吉巴督湿巴刹附近的建筑工地,未做任何防范措施,今天他重游旧地时,发现当地已设置路障和围栏,防止民众接近。 徐顺全今天(6月27日)在脸书发帖,分享有关事件,并对当局所采取的行动感到满意。 帖文中,他指出四天前发现该区154栋的建筑工地,并没有设置防止人们进入的路障,而该处又处于武吉巴督最拥挤地区内,附近还有湿巴刹和小贩中心,因此感到担忧。 据帖文中附上的照片中,可见该建筑工地周围有防水布料遮盖,但是布料已经破破烂烂,且无法阻止民众踏入工地,地上也铺满了石头。另一张图片中,只见有关的工地已经被红白网围起来,并设置了黄色路障,破烂的蓝色布料也已经被堆放在一旁,显得非常干净整齐。 “我四天前在武吉巴督拍下这张照片,可见现场一片凌乱;所幸今早回到现场,至少设置了安全警戒线。” 强调国会议员是全职工作 他指出,该工地并非一个隐蔽角落,是当地人潮最拥挤的地点之一,而出现有关情况,也不见武吉巴督议员穆仁理(Murali Pillai)出现或提及。因此,他认为单选区需要拥有自己的全职议员,否则的话,拥有其他工作在身的议员,无法全心全意为支持他的选民服务。 “这就是我说的,议员是全职工作。若你是兼职议员,你将所有时间花在个人日常工作上,无法做到100巴仙付出。” “人们透过选举让你来经营这个地区,你每月收到1万6000元薪金,工作却外包给代管人,然后由人民付费。请问这是什么逻辑。” 他补充道,身为国会议员,为选民服务是他的职责,是全职。 “随着赋予你的责任,你需要运营市议会、照顾选区,尤其关注居民的福祉和安全,在国会中代表他们发言,建立强大的社区并保护弱势群体,这是一份全职。这也是若成为武吉巴督国会议员后,需要执行的工作。”…

中学历就业率67巴仙 年长打工族学新技能应对职场变化

2017年,超过1千100名专业、经理、执行员和技师(PMET)群体,透过人力资源部就业支援计划(CSP)与高薪职缺匹配,当中有者失业超过12个月,其中有500人年龄超过50岁,人数高于2016年。 人力资源部在过去两年加速发展专业转职计划(PCP),协助中年PMET群体增加技能,寻求更好的薪资待遇和升迁集会。目前在30项领域中,已设立超过100个专业转职课程,比去年翻了一倍。 包含内部核数师、财务审计专业或顾问的新转职课程也在今年推出。人资部将继续监督和根据市场需求,拓展课程容量或增设合适的新课程。 人力资源部部长杨莉明,针对淡滨尼集选区国会议员钟丽慧的提问,在国会作上述书面回答。钟丽慧询及,政府推行“应变与提升计划”(Adapt and Grow)的效应;二,政府是否有意继续增设和拓展更多领域下的专业转职计划,令更多雇员受惠;以及就业支援计划对于高龄PMET群体的触及成效。 保障年长者就业 工党非选区议员吴佩松则提问,对于加强年长者终身就职能力的非营利组织,人资部提供何种辅助,杨莉明则回答,年长者要留在相关领域职场,则需与时并进适应时代和技能的变化。对于持续教育与培训(CET)课程,政府都有提供各方面拨款协助。 例如在未来技能中途职业强化津贴下,有受教育部和新加坡未来技能发展局(SSG)承认的课程,包括非营利组织如曹氏基金华美培训学院提供的劳动力技能认证(WSQ)技能课程。 政府倡议提供年长者具建设性的职场工作。新加坡国家雇主联合会(SNEF)则是政府WorkPro计划的主要伙伴,鼓励雇主重新调整工作流程,让年长者也能在职场上发挥生产力。 人资部也有直接的措施,帮助年长打工族提升就业能力。雇主聘请55岁以上、月薪不超过4千元的员工,可获政府特别就业津贴(SEC)补贴。在“应变与提升计划”中,人资部支援年长打工族寻找新工作,专业转职计划和就业支援计划等,则提供相应的培训和辅导,协助他们解决职能与薪水错配的问题。 与政府合作的非营利组织都能获得政府直接或间接的拨款协助。例如,政府支持飞跃家庭服务中心,透过旗下长者教育部门协助乐龄人士终身学习。…

Singapore's 'Supertrees' Spark Green Thoughts

By Saira Syed – They look like they belong on another planet…

Road closure in light of the Chinatown CNY Celebration 2017

Singapore Police Force (SPF) has announced the closure of several parts of…