Leong Sze Hian / Andrew Loh

We refer to new PAP candidate, Mr Lawrence Wong’s interview with Razor TV.

Question from reporter: You mentioned that you want to help low-income people. Do you think that S$300-plus per month for people on the PA (Public Assistance) scheme is enough?

New PAP candidate, Lawrence Wong, former Chief Executive of the Energy Market Authority:

“I don’t think we should just look at what is in the Public Assistance Scheme per se. There is a whole range of social assistance measures that the government has put in place. PA is one of them.  There’s Comcare, there’re assistance programme for children in kindergarten. So I think if you look at that whole broad suite of programmes, I think there is a wide range of programmes that can be brought to bear in any particular situation. And very often it’s not just administering programmes but it’s dealing with the families and the individuals at a human level, understanding what the roots concerns are, and being able to address these problems.” – Razor TV, 4:27mins.

It seems that Mr Wong feels that assistance to the needy is enough, despite PAP MP Lily Neo having to do battle with the Minister for Community, Youth and Sports each year over more help for the needy.

Ask any social worker or volunteer in the Voluntary Welfare Organisations (VWOs), and I believe almost everyone will tell you that there is never enough funds available to help the hundreds of thousands of needy they serve.

Practically everyday there are cases of needy Singaporeans struggling to survive, because they could do with more help.

In this connection, I would like to refer to the People’s Association 2009/2010 Annual Report.

On page 128, it’s reported that the “unutilised administrative grant” was S$2.782 million.

Does this mean that S$2.782 million, or about 13 per cent of the grant for the year, was not utilised? With so many needy Singaporeans struggling to make ends meet, why did we end up with an unutilised grant of $2.782 million?

In this connection, only about $1.57 million of the $6.25 million budgeted for the Comcare CCC Fund was given out after the first nine months of FY2008/2009.

Also, only 31 per cent of the previous year’s budgeted amount was disbursed (“The needy still lack awareness of help schemes”, Channel News Asia, Feb 3, 2009).

The above-mentioned $1.57 million disbursed for the nine months from April to December 2008 was despite the substantial increase in Comcare funds in that year.

“Between July and December 2008, ComCare gave out 67 per cent more from its Citizens’ Consultative Committee-ComCare (CCC) Fund,” the report by Channel News Asia said. “That is almost $400,000 more than the same period in 2007.” (Channel News Asia, Mar 21, 2009).

Have unutilised Medifund also?

The Medifund annual report says that over $64 million in Medifund was given out last year, and a surplus of $10 million will be converted to protected reserves when there is a change-over of government – that is, before the next general election. It will then become part of the capital fund, which cannot be used by the Government. Only the president can authorise its use.

In addition to last year’s $10 million surplus, the cumulative protected reserves from Medifund over the last decade or so was $76 million.

So, why is it that there are so much unutilised funds which could have been utilised to help needy Singaporeans?

I understand that practically every country in the world is always short of funds to help the poor. Hence, why is it that Singapore’s experience seems to be so different?


Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

别让“天声人语”变成“天怒人怨” 政府受促先专注疫情

冠状病毒19肆虐全球,但若政府有计划举行选举,究竟政治和生命,孰轻孰重? 新加坡前进党昨日就上载了广东话线上访谈节目《天声人语 第二集:生命比政治重要》,明确表明了他们的立场。 视频嘉宾,新加坡前进党助理秘书长梁文辉在接受黄志伟访问时,就分享了他认为目前疫情严峻不适合举办大选的原因,其中包括危及我国人民,尤其是年长者的健康安全、会分散防疫工作能力、距离本届政府届满还有将近一年的时间。 他鼓励人们在这段时间内,促进和家人的关系,并且照顾年长者的健康。他分析道,年长者为冠毒的高风险人群,若现在举办选举,所有防疫措施都要一步到位,否则投票时用的笔和选票都可能成为传播病毒的媒介。 此外,他希望政府能够关注在防疫工作上,尽量不要分散相关工作的人力、物力和财力,否则会加重防疫前线人员的工作,而一直以来的努力也白费了。 “新加坡的宪法规定,我们的大选期限是到2021年4月。所以时间很充裕,至少有一年以上,政府不需要急着举行大选。” 他也提到,基于外劳宿舍的交叉感染导致国内病例增加,因此呼吁政府“集中精神,先解决疫情这个问题”。

New infections detected in cleared migrant workers dormitories as many have never been infected and remain susceptible to COVID-19, says Tan See Leng

Given that many of the dormitory residents have never been infected with…

Is the current Singapore the Singapore we really want?

by: Vivian Chueh/ Is the current Singapore the Singapore we really want?…

Police arrest two men for allegedly setting off fireworks near Little India

Following the display of fireworks near Little India on Tuesday (6 Nov),…