Mr Andrew Kuan

Independent candidate Mr Andrew Kuan was asked to leave the opposition parties’ meeting held at the PKMS building this afternoon. The meeting, the second in a week, is the traditional horse-trading negotiation the parties hold to decide the constituencies where each of them will contest in the upcoming General Election.

Mr Kuan confirmed with The Online Citizen (TOC) that he left the meeting after 45 minutes as some members of the opposition insisted “that this meeting was only for opposition members with parties.” Since he is an independent candidate and hence is not a member of any party, some felt he should not be allowed at the meeting. TOC understands that Mr Kuan was the only independent candidate present.

Though Mr Kuan declined to name the individuals, saying that he will respect their privacy, he clarified that he was invited to the meeting by two or three “matured” individuals. He also added that the invitation to participate came from the chairman of the meeting, the PKMS secretary-general, Mr Mohd Nazem bin Suki.

Mr Kuan has previously announced his desire to contest Joo Chiat SMC. Another party that has expressed interest in the SMC is the Workers’ Party.

The negotiations among the parties ended with an agreement which will see all 27 constituencies contested in the General Election, which must be held before February 2012.


Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

HDT Singapore Taxi to double its fleet by June

Newcomer taxi operator, HDT Singapore Taxi, has announced that it will double…

保障街道上安全 陆交局推出行人行为准则

站有站姿,坐有坐相,陆路交通管理局推出行人行为准则,让本地居民行走在街上时有保障。 当局所推出的准则包括行人应使用步行道、行人过道,走在街道上时要靠左,以及行走时保持警惕心,关注周围,而尽量不要使用手机等设备。 据准则中指出,民众在有步行道、共用通道或脚踏车过道时,应率先使用步行道或行人过道,尽量不要使用脚踏车专用道。而在步行道或共用通道时,行人也受促尽量靠左,除非要超越前方的人们。 此外,在行走时,当局也促请民众避免使用移动通信设备,包括手机、听歌等,以免无法及时察觉路上的“陷阱”或危机。 据《海峡时报》报道指出,有关准则是活动通勤咨询小组(Active Mobility Advisory Panel)在去年首次提出,所建议的措施之一。 陆交局表示,将会继续让教育民众,并让民众参与营造更安全、更负责任的公路共享环境。“我们将在今年年底推出鼓励所有使用者,友善公路的运动。”

Reform Party’s Kenneth Jeyaretnam questions “minority certificate” and wonders about “three-cornered fights” on Nomination Day

Reform Party’s secretary-general Kenneth Jeyaretnam took to Facebook at 9am to share…

李显扬:显龙对遗嘱有疑问 应以公民身份投诉

李显扬再度发文抨击,指总检察署仍未回答他的提问,为何要为私人事务浪费公共资源?如果总理李显龙对父亲的遗嘱有疑问,理应以私人公民身份提出投诉。 他非议总理假借总检察署,向律师公会提呈其妻子林学芬,指林学芬在为李光耀准备遗嘱一事失职。 李显扬在个人脸书发文写道:“总检察署为何种公共利益服务?事情过了那么久,为何要为私人事务浪费公共资源?其中有许多都是各方已知的事实,但为何选择在2019年仓促重提此案?” “然而,总检察署没有回答这些疑问。反之,当具体到曾向律师公会投诉过五项个案–却没有任何一单是过了五年的旧事,也不涉及四人遗嘱。” 他指出,在各方都有法律代表的情况下,总检察署插手有关私人遗嘱事项,是前所未有的。 “如果显龙对父亲的遗嘱有疑问,理应以私人公民身份提出投诉。” 总理李显龙妹妹李玮玲医生,于本月6日10时42分,在个人脸书揭露总检察署向新加坡律师公会提呈逾500页的投诉信。总检察署在答复媒体询问时指出,李显扬妻子林学芬作为专业律师,在为李光耀准备遗嘱一事,有失职之嫌的表面证据,表面触犯法律专业(专业行为规章)第25节条文和第46节条文。 当局认为,林学芬在李光耀最后一份遗嘱,以李显扬作为受益人的情况下准备遗嘱,并安排李光耀执行,而李显扬获得的份额有增加。 对此,李显扬在本月7日发文回应,其妻子从未担任李光耀的律师,父亲的遗嘱在五年前就已执行。当父亲完成遗嘱后,告知全家和他的律师,遗嘱由李&李律师事务所保管。 他说,没有人在父亲签定最终遗嘱的过程提出投诉—包括父亲自身、任何受益人、以及咨询黄鲁胜(现任总检察长)的李显龙。 他反驳总检察署称妻子林学芬拒绝回应是不实的,并呼吁总检察署公开完整往来信件。 曾担任李显龙私人秘书的总检察长黄鲁胜回避处理林学芬可能专业行为失当一事,事件改由副总检察长余文正负责。…