For immediate release

29 January 2011

MARUAH’s View of the Police Investigations into SFD Members’ Sale of Death Penalty Book

Source: SFD

MARUAH notes the statement by NGO Singaporeans for Democracy (SFD) and various media reports about the recent initiation of police investigations into three SFD members over their alleged sale of copies of the book Once A Jolly Hangman: Singapore Justice in the Dock at a film screening held on 14 November 2010 at the Substation. The SFD members are being investigated under Section 502 of the Penal Code, for the knowing “sale of printed or engraved substance containing defamatory matter”.

Although the police commenced investigations against Mr Alan Shadrake, the author of the book, for criminal defamation in 2010, no formal charges have been instituted. It is thus troubling how an investigation can begin into the sale of printed substance containing defamatory matter if the book in question has not been found by a court of law to be defamatory. Indeed, charges have not even been brought.

MARUAH therefore calls upon the Singapore Police Force to explain why it is initiating these criminal investigations on the three SFD members in relation to the sale of the book, when the author himself has not been charged.

Furthermore, if the Government’s position is that the sale of the book would be unlawful, then the proper course of action is to ban the book outright, which is a transparent action that is accountable and subject to judicial review of the courts where appropriate, and also conforms with the rule of law.

MARUAH President Braema Mathi

MARUAH President Braema Mathi says: “These criminal investigations by the police carry a much heavier ‘footprint’ than contempt proceedings. In this case it is bewildering why the police are investigating sellers of the book when there is no criminal defamation charge against the author or contempt proceedings against the three members.

”MARUAH is opposed to investigations without any reasonable basis, as these will only serve to significantly chill public debate on the death penalty and detract from Singaporeans’ constitutional right to free expression. ”

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

”外籍专才“酸国人“懒”工作被抢? 大华银行急澄清非雇员

有”外籍雇员“竟敢酸国人因为懒惰,所以工作才被印度籍人士取代? 有网民在本地社交媒体hardware zone,截图一名”外籍专才“的评论,该账号署名”Amit Verma“,评论内容大致如下: ”你们非常种族歧视!何必去提外籍人士的签证问题?没有其他国家会以这么明显排外主义的方式报告(外籍人士)比例!如果Singapoo国人不懒惰,那么我们印度人就不会取代你们的工作…请给予印度籍雇员尊重!“ 这截图马上再网络疯传,有者便肉搜,发现”Amit Verma“在大华银行(UOB)工作,且职务栏上填“副主席”(Vice President),于是直接在脸书要求大华银行解释。 网民Felix Ng表示,作为大华银行客户,当国人被称为”Singapoo”,形同是在羞辱国人,乃至于这是令该银行蒙羞。为此,他要求大华银行需彻查,有关贴文是否属实,会否对这名雇员采取行动。 大华银行也很快作出回应,澄清上述 “Amit…

COVID-19 task force looks into air flow and ventilation systems as possible factors in TTSH cluster

The COVID-19 task force is looking into the factors that might have…