by Leong Sze Hian

Source: news.xin.msn.com

I refer to the Ministry of Manpower’s (MOM) “Employment Situation in Fourth Quarter 2010” report released on 31 January.

It states that “Local employment grew by 54,200 in 2010, exceeding the 41,800 gains in 2009. With the strong economic recovery and higher demand for manpower, foreign employment increased by 58,300 in 2010, after declining by 4,200 in 2009”.

This means that employment for locals grew by 12,400, whereas employment for foreigners grew by 62,500.

Despite all the rhetoric and assurances that the import of foreign workers will be scaled back, these latest statistics seem to reveal otherwise.

The fact which I believe no media report has highlighted is that foreign employment growth was five times that of locals.

If we adjust for permanent residents (PRs) from the locals data, how much of the employment growth was for Singaporeans?

Since the number of new citizens and PRs was 48,023 (29,265 PRs and 18,758 new citizens) last year, how many of the 54,200 growth in local employment went to Singaporeans?

According to the report, as at December 2010, there were 1,990,700 locals forming 64.2% of the 3,102,500 persons employed in Singapore. The remaining 35.8% or 1,111,800 were foreigners.

Since we do not have the break-down for locals into Singaporeans and PRs, if about 20 per cent of local workers are PRs, then the total proportion of non-Singaporean workers may be inching close to half the total workforce.

The overall unemployment rate also rose slightly to a seasonally adjusted 2.2% in December 2010 from 2.1% in September 2010. Among the resident labour force, the seasonally adjusted unemployment rate was unchanged at 3.1%.

Why is it that the unemployment rate has risen in the light of Singapore’s record 14.7 GDP growth and frequent media reports of a very tight labour market, over the last few months?.

Since there were 48,023 new citizens and PRs last year, I surmise that the Singaporean unemployment rate (if known) may have risen, given that the growth in local employment was on a relative to “new citizens and PRs” context, only 54,200.

By the way, the non-seasonally adjusted unemployment rate for locals increased from 2.6 per cent in the third quarter to 2.7 per cent in the fourth quarter.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Audio recordings to be allowed in inward-facing in-vehicle recording devices (IVRDs) in taxis and private hire cars (PHCs)

Audio recordings will now be allowed in inward-facing in-vehicle recording devices (IVRDs)…

Australian expat being investigated for alleged punching incident

By Tiffany Gwee An Australian expatriate, Mr Aaron Jeremiejczyk, who was accused…

Face To Face: Meeting of Bodies but not of Minds

The following is a contribution by a member of the audience at…

四年来第三起骚乱 男童收容所七少年被捕

据《海峡时报》报导,由社会及家庭发展部管理的新加坡男童收容所,再传骚乱事件,有七名少年被捕,所幸事故中未有人受伤。 本月10日晚上,有少年在收容所内闹事,蓄意破坏、把物品丢出房间等,制造混乱。局势在两小时后才平复下来。 而被捕的少年,年龄介于12-19岁,据了解事故起因仍在调查中。 这也是四年来该收容所发生的第三次骚乱事件。2016年9月,有26名成员以非法集会名义下被警方逮捕,他们涉及把家具从窗户丢出去、砸坏灯管和试图逃跑。 去年9月,11名少年也因为参与骚乱被逮捕,年龄介于14岁至17岁。他们涉及袭击指挥官、助理经理和辅警,打坏家具等, 随后警察赶来,甚至动员约50名警员,全副武装以防暴装备严正以待。 在上月21日的审讯,检控官指,当警察到来时,这些少年还大声唱歌等警察逮捕。其中有三名17岁少年前日在法庭承认参与一项纠众闹事,以及两项破坏公物罪名。 而在昨日的法庭审讯,有两名17岁少年被判接受改造训练一年,这意味着他们需要接受严格培训,包括步操和辅导等,法官认为他们罔顾他人和造成破坏,理应接受“严厉惩处”。