By Joshua Chiang


am·a·teur (m-tûr, -tr, -chr, -chr, -tyr)

  1. A person who engages in an art, science, study, or athletic activity as a pastime rather than as a profession.
  2. Sports. An athlete who has never accepted money, or who accepts money under restrictions specified by a regulatory body, for participating in a competition.

Today the word ‘amateur’ is so synonymous with inexperience and sub-par performance that we often forget that the root of the word is amor – love. In other words, an amateur is driven by one thing – love (or passion).

When Andrew Loh was Chief Editor, one of the things he often said was that TOC is run by a bunch of amateurs. It was a statement he made with pride.

We are amateurs.

It might not seem like that sometimes to people who read our articles and the stories we break. But like how the idea for the Face to Face forum came about, most of the things we’ve done so far are often the result of a moment of inspiration followed by many hours of panicking and wishing we hadn’t been so easily carried away by our ideas to begin with.

Some of our bigger stories this year happened because we stumbled onto them. A case in point would be the series of articles on homeless people. It all started when Andrew was staying near Sembawang Park and got to know the campers on the beach. I joined him on one of his visits and was so angered by what I saw that I decided to write something about it. (See “People of the Tents“) If anyone had asked me then, I’d confess that I had no plans beyond that single article. But then one thing led to another. Before we knew it, we were writing story after story on not just the campers, but also about the HDB policies that led to homelessness.

That was pretty much how the Moratorium on Death Penalty campaign came about. I cannot speak for the rest, but my involvement began for a very simple reason – I could not sleep at night knowing that there was something I could do for Yong Vui Kong. Sure, my contribution might not change any thing, but I felt I had to try.

When The Online Citizen, together with The Singapore Anti-Death Penalty Campaign organized a petition-signing at Speaker’s Corner in August to ask for clemency for Vui Kong, about 150 turned up – a very encouraging sign considering that a similar event the year before saw just 40 people.

Today, I attended another ‘amateur’ event – Second Chances in the Park. It was organized by two of our volunteers Kirsten Han and Damien Chng, who also founded the ‘We Believe in Second Chances’ Campaign. Now these two are young. Kirsten is 22 and Damien, just 19. Neither of them had organized something quite like this before. But the event went amazingly well. It was fun and it was meaningful and everyone had a great time. Some passers-by were so impressed, they even stopped to sign a banner meant as a present for Vui Kong’s 23rd birthday.

People often express surprise when they find out that The Online Citizen is not made up of a bunch of career professionals but a team of volunteers from different walks of life.

Considering the fact that there are hardly any financial rewards to be reaped from doing what we do, not to mention knowingly putting ourselves under the uncomfortable glare of the Government spotlight (we believe that if we want to be taken seriously, we cannot remain anonymous), I really think one of the main reasons why we do what we do is because we give a damn.

Which makes us a bunch of amateurs.

I’ve been a reader of The Online Citizen longer than I’ve been part of the team. I’ve come across many comments expressing frustration and a desire for change. But underlying these comments is a sense of powerlessness. The reasons range from how the incumbent will block any progress, to the perceived weakness of the opposition parties. We keep looking for Singapore’s version of Barrack Obama. We keep waiting for elections to come so we can cast our votes.

And in the meantime we keep waiting for a professional to show up and lead the way. But let’s not forget that ordinary people, us ‘non-professionals’, can do something too.

Be an amateur. Get involved – now. And don’t worry too much about the results.

Because in the words of four men who were supposedly bigger than a religious figure, all you need is love. Amor.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Rat found in House Brand basmati rice packet

Facebook user Vegnesh Jodimani shared a shocking discovery on Saturday, 2 March…

2019年社会进步指数 基本需求新加坡得分高 个人权益、环境素质及包容度待改善

根据美国非营利组织Social Progress Imperative公布《2019年社会进步指数(SocialProgress Index, SPI)》报告,新加坡在满足人民基本需求如营养和基本医疗保健上,取得最高分。 不过,在个人权益、环境素质和社会包容性等事项,被指有待改善。 在2019年社会进步指数中评估的149个国家,新加坡排名第27,整体得分83.23,比去年首次被纳入调查的排名下滑了四个位置,但仍领先其他东南亚国家。 不过位居榜首前三名国家,则是挪威、丹麦和瑞士。芬兰、瑞典、冰岛、纽西兰、德国、加拿大和日本则位列前十。 2019年社会进步指数是在上月公布,从51项指标:营养、安全、个人权益和包容度等衡量各国。 我国在满足营养、医疗护理等基本需求方面,取得将近满分的98.39分。在饮用水供应和卫生设施方面也取得满分。 然而,在个人个人权益、包容性方面,则被指有待加强。个人权益方面在149国排名仅88名,政治权益、表达意见自由和诉求公义等得分,也同样表现欠佳。 至于环境素质方面,得分68.35,排名72名;而包容度方面表现最差,得分52.32,排名56。有关指标涵括对少数群体是否存有歧视、性别、社会经济地位和社会群体在政治地位的平等,以及对性少数群体的接纳程度。…