Leong Sze Hian

Why are Permanent Residents (PRs) who are single buying HDB resale flats like nobody’s business?

Singaporeans who are single and below age 35 are not allowed to buy HDB resale flats unless they are orphans.

PRs sibings who are single and below 35, however, are allowed to purchase these flats.

Why does our public housing policy favour PRs over Singaporeans? Is it not discriminatory and unfair?

Has any Members of Parliament ever raised this issue vigorously in Parliament?

The mission of the HDB should be to help Singaporeans own homes. So, how can single PRs be given priority over Singaporeans?

If you are a below-35 PR in Singapore, wouldn’t you try to arrange for one of your siblings to come to work in Singapore too, and apply for permanent residency?

Whilst there are no official statistics on how many HDB flats are owned by single PRs, anecdoctal evidence seems to suggest that an increasing number of single PRs may be buying them.

As there are also no official statistics on how many single PR siblings are in Singapore, it may probably not be too far an estimate to say that there may be tens of thousands in total.

When one of the PR siblings leave Singapore, after a resale flat has been purchased, are they still allowed to keep the flat? I believe the answer is yes, at least for a few years.

The cheapest HDB 3-room flat (2 bed-rooms) that a single Singaporean or PR can rent is about S$1,500. With housing loan interest rates at historical lows in Singapore, the monthly repayment for a $220,000 HDB bank loan is only just over $800.

So, is it any wonder why it may make more sense for single PR siblings to buy a resale HDB flat, instead of renting one?

3, 4 and 5-room HDB resale flats are going for around $280,000, $370,000 and $440,000 (median sale prices), respectively, with a typical down-payment of 20 per cent of the purchase price.

PR siblings can sell their resale HDB flats after a Minimum Occupation Period of 5 years. So, from a financial perspective, it may make more sense to buy than to rent, and possibly reap the capital gains as well after 5 years.

The increasing “headache” for some Singaporeans may be that they cannot afford the Cash-Over-Valuation (COV) on a resale flat.

Since PR siblings when they first come to Singapore typically do not have permanent residency status yet, they do not need to contribute to CPF. Thus, they generally may have more cash to pay for COV because their take-home pay is higher without CPF contributions relative to Singaporeans, until such time that they become PRs and qualify to buy HDB resale flats.

Even when they become PRs, the first 2 years’ CPF contribution is lower than for citizens.

2 PR siblings may generally just need to stay in one bedroom.

So, some may rent out rooms immediately after they buy a flat. [PRs can rent out rooms immediately but not the entire flat.] The PR sibling owners can stay in 1 room themselves, and rent the rest of the rooms out. Under HDB rules, you are allowed to have up to 9 persons staying in say a 5-room (4 bed-room flat). So one can rent out to 7 persons, at say $150 per person.

Some PR siblings may also be accustomed to sharing a flat before they buy their resale flat.

So, they may be able to pay higher prices for resale HDB flats, because they plan to rent out the rooms for income.

Singaporeans, on the other hand, generally buy flats to stay without the intention to rent out rooms immediately.

I think most Singaporeans see a HDB flat as their home for life, and not as a temporary investment, providing income as well as saving on housing costs whilst in Singapore.

Are these some of the possible contributing factors to why HDB resale prices have been skyrocketing?

In this connection, HDB resale prices rose about 75 per cent over the last 5 years, compared to a lower appreciation for the private property price index.

HDB policies could be reviewed, with a focus on the undesirable outcomes for Singaporeans, and at the same time vis-a-vis PRs.


Read also: HDB flats – S’poreans come first?

Notify of
1 Comment
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Introduction of the code of conduct for pedestrians is good though overdue, says WP MP Dennis Tan

Singapore’s first-ever code of conduct for pedestrians was recently introduced, which is…

Leaked cables on the failed leadership transition of Temasek Holdings

[youtube id=”l04ynJ37Cek” align=”center” mode=”normal”] 6 years ago, the intended leadership transition of…

两个月未公开现身? 马云行踪引揣测

阿里巴巴创始人马云已逾两月未在公开场合现身,也缺席了他曾担任评委的真人秀决赛,引发媒体的普遍关注,纷纷猜测其行踪。 针对马云的“玩失踪”,英语媒体《金融时报》于1月1日发表文章,称马云从他自创的“非洲创业者真人秀”的决赛圈评审团中“消失”,暗示着他在中国失宠后陷入困境。 报道指出,在2020年11月所举行的第二届决赛中,评委已由阿里巴巴高管彭蕾所取代。对此,阿里巴巴的发言人周一向路透表示,评委换人是因为日程安排冲突,但没有做进一步评论。 然而,值得关注的是,在“非洲创业者”决赛前几周,马云还曾在推特上表示,“迫不及待想见参赛者”。 《每日邮报》则称,马云缺席决赛很神秘。该报认为,考虑到他从前极为高调,突然的转变反而更引人注目,现在马云是“彻底在公众视线中消失”。 “我认为是有人告诉他要低调些,”北京的科技咨询公司BDA China董事长Duncan Clark说。“这种情况非常特殊,更多是和蚂蚁集团的庞大规模以及金融监管的敏感性有关,”他说。 阿里巴巴在香港市场周一股价跌2.15%。 根据马云微博最后一册更新,是在去年10月17日,当时马云发布一则在2020年中国基础教育创新发展论坛上的发言。 一周后,马云在上海的一场金融论坛上称中国没有系统性金融风险,因为中国金融基本上没有系统。此番言论意味着,与通过视频致辞中国国家副主席王岐山公开唱反调。 马云当时还表示,必须改掉金融的”当铺思想”,且批评旨在降低金融风险的国际间”巴塞尔协议”是老人俱乐部,并表示”好的创新不怕监管,但是怕用昨天的方式去监管”。…

跨性别学生遇霸凌、遭施压 本地性少数组织发文抨击教育部

昨日(26日)傍晚五时许,至少有五名青年站在教育部大楼外拿纸牌抗议,也举着象征性少数群体(LGBTQ+)的彩虹旗。 他们呼吁教育部长黄循财,应停止对性少数群体的歧视,维护学生在安全及受支持环境下学习的权利。 最终警方到场,仍有三名青年在场,警员警告他们停止活动不果,便逮捕了三名示威者,其中两人是学生。 较后性少数权益组织新加坡粉红点,联同Prout、Ready4Repeal、Sayoni、TransBeFrienders以及TransgenderSG等,发表联合声明,强调上述抗议活动显示本地青年长期在体制下“被隐形”,他们面对的困境被压制。 “他们相信已经用尽了正式够同管道,除非采取让他们冒着风险的严厉行动,否则他们的声音不会被听见。” 声明中也提及他们提呈给联合国的报告,显示至少77.6巴仙公开自己跨性别身份的学生,在校园都曾经历霸凌或性骚扰等负面体验。 不到三分之一受访者认为在校园是安全的;只有24巴仙受访者反映有可以求助的职员。 报告也指一些学校管理层似乎曾试图阻止跨性别学生转换性别,或是提出不合理要求、即便有高水准表现的跨性别学生也被施加压力而最终离校。 声明指责,教育部未能确保跨性别学生在校园取得同等的扶助。 事缘早前有18岁跨性别大学生,在Reddit上控诉教育部阻止她进行荷尔蒙补充疗法。 该名学生指出,她认为自己是“由男性转为女性”的跨性别女性,此前曾被心理卫生学院诊断出患上“性别焦虑症”(gender dysphoria)。…