“Susan Elliot has spent three decades in education and taught thousands of students. She is bright, articulate, and has a great sense of humor,” writes Mr Anthony Mullen on the Teacher Magazine website. “She teaches social studies and history to mainstream and hearing-impaired students-all in the same classroom. Her unique ability to teach social studies and history to both “regular” and hearing-impaired students in the same classroom is a remarkable display of master teaching.”

Her credentials were so impressive that the Singapore Ministry of Education invited her to the Teachers’ Conference to be held  in September in Singapore this year.

However, when the MOE learnt that Ms Elliot was hearing-impaired, it withdrew its invitation to Ms Elliot. According to Mr Mullen, who was named the 59th National Teacher of the Year in the United States, the MOE attributed the invitation and then its retraction as a “miscommunication”. “The so-called discovery and subsequent retraction of her invitation was an act of disingenuous statesmanship because the Singapore education officials knew all along that Susan was deaf,” said Mr Mullen whose article was widely circulated on the Internet and social networking site Facebook.

In reply to a query by The Online Citizen over the incident, the MOE said “the withdrawal of our invitation to Ms Susan Elliot was a mistake on our part” which resulted from “our misunderstanding about the need for interpreters and her professional experience.”

The MOE says the chairman of the Organising Committee for the September conference has since spoken to Ms Elliot personally to convey the ministry’s apologies. “We should have clarified these matters before making the decision,” it said in its reply to TOC.

“Ms Elliot has accepted our apology and the Organising Committee is delighted that she will participate at the Teachers’ Conference in September. We look forward to her contributions in making the Conference a success,” the MOE said.

The conference, held once in two years, is an opportunity for teachers to be engaged in in-depth inquiry into educational issues and pedagogical concerns. Internationally renowned speakers and fellow teachers will share on educational issues. The conference will focus on two key ideas: the professional practice and the practitioners. One of the strands of the theme for the meeting is “Enhancing the professional practice of teachers” and the other is on “Teachers as learners, teachers as leaders.”

The event will take place on 6 September and 7 September at the Suntec International Convention and Exhibition Centre, Singapore.

Andrew Loh

——-

Read more about the Teachers’ Conference here.

Picture from: http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/education/

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【2020财政预算案】前进党:应助百姓纾困应对疫情 正视外籍客工对就业市场影响

昨日(18日),副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰在国会公布2020年财政预算案。 新加坡前进党此前已建议落实扩张性预算案,提升经济和就业机会;提供短期财政援助纾困,同时反对调涨消费税。 对此该党针对政府的财案发表看法,先是感谢政府聆听该党和民间各造的意见,赞许额外拨款8亿元供前线医务人员抗疫的举措。 助理秘书长梁文辉则认为,面对武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)的冲击下,老百姓家户也应获得额外的纾困减轻负担,因此提出比起现有政府拨款16亿元“关怀与援助配套”相比,应该还能做得更好。 “我们建议至少为本地家户拨款10至20亿元,以协助老百姓应对经济下行和疫情面对的困境。” 该党也强调,财案不应是糖果袋,反之应该是长期性的规划,而不是短期或临时性的财政发放。然而该党认为政府的财案以不同形式的“糖果”派发,也很难让人民理解如何能从中受惠,也缺乏对振兴经济信心的成效。 “经济过于依赖外籍客工” 再者,前进党提醒从疫情的爆发,也可见我国企业和经济面对的一项问题:过于依赖外籍客工。其中这也部分是因为生育率低下造成的,“故此我们应该重新审视,透过提升生育率来增加本地劳动力的更强有力政策” 尽管王瑞杰宣布明年将不会调涨消费税,不过前进党强调该党反对考量当前局势,未来五年都不建议调涨消费税或其他费用。有鉴于政府未言明调涨消费税的时间点(仅表示2025年需调涨),为此该党也质疑政府推出60亿元援助配套的合理性。 “再者,此前政府一再强调调涨消费税之必要。然而如今又得以基于经济困境暂缓,还能拨出逾60亿元的援助配套,且不需动用储备金”。这使得该党质疑未来是否还有调整消费税的理据。 另一方面,政府宣布将S准证持有者比率分两阶段进行调整。从明年1月起,先把顶限调低到18巴仙。到2023年1月,再调低到15巴仙。 正视外籍客工构成职场竞争…

Singapore proposes extension of Seletar’s ILS and Pasir Gudang’s RA following meeting between transport ministers

Following the meeting between Singapore’s Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan and his Malaysian…

25本地公民组织联署声明 国家应容许“真诚分歧”捍卫言论自由

25个本地网络媒体、群组和公民组织,包括本社、情义之家、第八功能、MARUAH、CARE等发表联署声明,呼吁新加坡社会应容许“真诚分歧”,并检讨现有限制言论自由的法律规章。 声明表示,公民群体高度关注本地社运分子范国瀚面对的多项控状。2017年,范国瀚被指涉非法集会、破坏公物,且拒绝签署警方口供而被提控。当时本地有六家非政府组织发文声援、6533人联署,并呼吁捍卫言论自由。 此后,多个东南亚和国际组织,都呼吁我国政府撤销掉对范国瀚的诉讼,包括:欧盟国家的一些议员、马国52家公民社会组织、联合国人权委会、人权观察组织、国际特赦组织、CIVICUS、国际法律家委员会、言论自由维权组织“ARTICLE 19”、东盟国会议员支持人权组织(APHR)和亚洲论坛等。 来自各地的声援声浪,再再说明对范的起诉,已经违反了社会共同的愿景,即不论本土公民、非公民居民和海外盟友,都拥有集会、串联、和平抗议、言论和书写的自由,以及能公开辩论棘手课题。 “如果言论自由仅限于芳林花园,那就不是真正的自由。” 即便面对要求撤销范国瀚诉状的舆论和呼声,但是后者还是面对判决。此外,他还因为声援被控被控刑事诽谤的《网络公民》总编许渊臣,在法庭前举起一张A4纸拍照,也因此被警方援引《公共秩序法》调查。 声明指出,对范的控状,如同对公共自由的严重钳制,使得民间追求变革和为不公发声的能力被打压。 “即便政府不认同、不愿接受,我们仍有表达真相的自由,并且为共同关注的课题坦诚交流和行动。” 应容许“真诚的分歧” 诚如非选区议员特斯拉所言,健全的社会必须容许“真诚的分歧”。但是假借公共秩序、防止外国干预或藐视法庭之名,实则打压言论自由的法律规章,都应该严谨检讨。 声明称,过去范国瀚把心血都花在本土各项人权和社会议题,他所表达的关注,其实和所有国人息息相关,而对范的诉讼对国人来说不是好现象。声援范国瀚,也正是共同捍卫国人得以免于恐惧和自由的生活。…