Latest:
Siew Kum Hong will not be reappointed for a second-term as a Nominated Member of Parliament. Read his blog post for his views.

Darren Boon, Andrew Loh

Is the Singapore police ignorant about the laws governing indoor forums?

That is the question on the mind of filmmaker Mr Martyn See. He had originally organised a public forum at the premise of Bestway Auditorium on 20th June 2009 at Prince Edward Road.

However, the filmmaker and activist was surprised to receive an email from the Tanglin Police Division requesting him to furnish the police information regarding the names of speakers and the format of the Operation Spectrum forum under the Public Entertainment and Meetings Acts.

Mr See told The Online Citizen: “It was unexpected.  My immediate thought was to verify if the email was true.  So I called the police.”

Mr See explained to the officer that indoor talks are exempted from permits as announced by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong in 2004.  “I then assured him that there will be no foreign speakers,” said Mr See in his blog. Still, the officer was insistent that he provide the details about the forum.  Mr See agreed to do so through email.

Mr See wrote an email to Mr K. Shanmugam, Minister for Law and Second Minister for Home Affairs quoting, excerpts from PM Lee’s speech in 2004.  A carbon copy of the email was also sent to the Tanglin Police Division.

It was only after a week on Jun 26, two days before the forum that Mr See received a reply from the Public Entertainment and Liquor Licensing Unit informing him that indoor talks are indeed exempted from permits.  He has “no idea” why the authorities took a week to reply to him.

Mr See told The Online Citizen that he had received email and queries prior to the incident as to what constitutes the requirement for a legal permit.  “My case has illustrated where the OB markers are concerned,” he said.

Mr See has also released the exchange of emails on his blog.

Organising the forum had been an uphill task for Mr See.  The forum was initially scheduled to be held on Jun 20 at Bestway Building but had been cancelled due to what the properties management said were “ongoing police investigations”.

“And I still don’t know on what basis did the police “investigate” Bestway Properties for hosting the first forum, originally intended on 20th June,” said Mr See.

The forum was held on Jun 28 at the Quality Hotel instead and was attended by 40 people.

In a separate case, another filmmaker, Mr Seelan Palay, has run into potential trouble with the police as well. Mr Seelan had made and screened the film, One Nation Under Lee, to the public in 2008. During the screening, officers from the Media Development Authority seized a copy of the film.

He is being investigated  under section 21 of the Films Act which states that —(1) Any person who —(a) has in his possession;(b) exhibits or distributes; or(c) reproduces,any film without a valid certificate, approving the exhibition of the film, shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction.

You can read a transcript of Mr Seelan’s interview by the police here.

—-

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

刘太格强调属个人意见 一千万人口规划旨在防患未然

一千万人口课题成为我国本届大选的热门话题之一,然而新加坡规划大师刘太格表示,并没有太注意这些朝野争议,仅强调一千万人口不是目标,而是国家的最坏打算。 现年82岁的刘太格于日前接受《联合早报》访问,他曾于1969年担任建屋局局长兼总建筑师至1989年,之后担任市区重建局局长兼总规划师至1992年。他在我国于2013年发表人口白皮书后,就多次呼吁政府要做长远打算,在进行城市规划上,要以2100年会出现一千万人口作为基准。 他重申需要做长远打算的立场。“万一达到1000万,我们是有准备的。” 在本届大选中,民主党的竞选宣言“4Y1N”(四要一不)中的不要,就是拒绝一千万人口规划,质疑政府的人口目标。人民行动党驳斥有关指控,强调没有做过以上发言,更指民主党散播假消息。随后,一千万人口规划课题就似乎成为每个候选人访谈和辩论上的课题了。 原副总理王瑞杰也声称,自己没认可刘太格的主张,在去年三月底论坛只是解释人口规模不单只是实体空间,也包含社会空间,以及如何保有凝聚力。不过,他也提及我国人口密度还不算过高,还有其他城市在宜居空间方面更加拥挤。 刘太格强调,在离开公共服务领域后,就没有和任何与政治或政治领导的人物交往,更强调以一千万人口作为规划基准,一直都是他的“个人意见”。 他指出,依据一千万人口的基准提前规划好国家,能够确保国民拥有足够的高速公路和地铁路线,保存我国的绿地和古建筑物等城市环境,更不会在事情发生时才措手不及。 在受访时,他忆述曾于1991年规划我国人口在百年后达到550万,而当前我国人口已经约571万人了,比他预估的早了70年。 他表示,只要政府能够有效运作,且国家经济获得良好发展,我国的就业岗位就会增加,人口也随着剧增。 刘太格坦承,他了解民众对我国基板设施是否能够应付庞大人口,大量引进移民是否导致人口增加的忧虑。惟,他认为基本设施服务属行政管理课题,而引进外国人口也不能说只有缺点,他们也带来了很多正面的影响。对此,他也感到忧虑,因为国人的思维似乎过于单一化了。  

50岁情侣反锁家内扬言同归于尽 警破窗救援

一对50岁情侣在昨日(2日)将自己反锁在家内,并扬言要同归于尽,吓得邻居立即报警处理,而情侣双双在随后也被捕。 这对情侣将自己反锁在惹兰红山(Jalan Bukit Merah)第3组屋内,位于该组屋的第九层。 邻居指出,该名55岁男子与52岁女子已住在一起大约十年,男子无业,而女子则目前正就职清洁工。 案发当时男子正对着女子大吼,并扬言要挟同女子一同跳下楼。 而民防部队则向《新报》透露,大约晚间9点左右接获通报,于是便立即前往案发现场,并在底层放置缓冲气囊,阻止闹出人命。 随后等到灾难援助与救援队到来,并利用安全网从大楼到公寓的窗户击碎,再进入到屋内,对峙才得以停止。 警方发言人表示,该名男子涉嫌使用武力阻止公务员执行职务,而女子则涉嫌吸毒,目前双双已被逮捕,案件仍在侦办中。

Netizens disagree with experts’ opinion that accepting low salary jobs as fresh graduates will not affect their career

Human resource experts pointed out that fresh graduates have nothing to worry…

Man who absconded while on bail caught by police only after 13 years through a comical coincidence

Yesterday (25 Jun), it was reported in the media that one Nalla…