By Terence Lee / Deputy Editor

Muslims as hateful bigots? The Pope as the antichrist? Dungeon & Dragon games as a tool of Satan? Read about a litany of horrifying accusations and more on Chick Publication’s tracts.

A LACK of knowledge should never be an excuse for breaking the law, even if you are sincere in your motives. Worse, it could even land you in jail.

That was what happened to Singaporean Christian couple Ong Kian Cheong and Dorothy Chan, who were sentenced to eight weeks in jail for distributing offensive tracts to Muslims.

(Graphic: A snippet out of the “Who is Allah” tract, which is banned in Singapore.)

They were sentenced under the Sedition Act, which is a statute that maintains harmony and peace within Singapore society by governing freedom of expression.

Sincerity was not an issue with them. This is the first time they have committed an offense, and it does not appear that they are deliberately trying to generate hostility or ill-will.

Furthermore, Judge Neighbour was quoted in the Straits Times as saying that their only intention was to spread the gospel, but being intelligent adults, they should have the common sense to discern what is acceptable and what is not.

The Judge does not believe they have not read the contents.

What do the tracts contain?

Upon taking a closer look at what the tracts communicate, it can be easy to see why the sentence was passed.

The website of the publisher, Chick Publications, is banned by the Media Development Authority (MDA) on the major Internet Service Providers in Singapore, putting it in the same category with websites like Penthouse and Playboy.

It is what the government calls a “symbolic” ban, a societal banner that highlights its people’s moral standing.

The information presented in the tracts is inflammatory, misleading, and distorted. From the outrageous to the downright bizarre, the doctrine of the Chick Fundamentalist Church can almost be described as cultish.

For example, in “Who is Allah?” — which was one of the tracts the couple distributed, it is alleged that Allah is actually an ancient moon god.

The details are told in stylised comic-book style illustrations, and starts off with a father talking to his son about Islam outside a mosque.

A Middle-Eastern Muslim worshipper, overhearing the word “moon god”, becomes outraged. He runs up to them, calls the father an “infidel”, and says: “The holy Qur’an says I could KILL (emphasis is original) you for saying that!” (Graphic)

In the ensuing conversation, the Muslim man boasts that Islam is the second largest religion in America, and even adds: “You people should FEAR US!

He goes on to describe a Muslim plot to bring about the end of Christianity in America, and how he expects a Muslim flag to fly over the White House soon.

Right off the bat, the tract sets out to stereotype all Muslims as fundamentalists with a sinister agenda. Add on a traditional Middle-Eastern garb to the pushy Muslim man, and you have a classic case of orientalism, which is a Western political doctrine that stereotypes Middle-Easterners as aggressive and barbaric (For more on Orientalism, click here).

And as a final coup de grâce, the story ends off with the Muslim man becoming totally convinced by the Christian’s arguments, and he ends up giving up his Muslim faith in embrace of Jesus – all in the space of one conversation!

Perhaps there is cold comfort in knowing that Muslims are not the only target of Chick publications. Evolutionists, homosexuals, Dungeon & Dragon players, rock music fans, and Roman Catholics are all fair game.

Chick versus the world

In “The Gay Blade”, homosexuals are demonised as sex-crazed fiends. In another tract called “Moving on Up”, a boy who believes in evolution is depicted as being held under sway by the devil, who is seen walking around him and whispering in his ears. The boy, at the end of the story, ends up in hell.

(Graphic: Believe in evolution, and risk going to hell.)

It is arguable the Roman Catholics are more of a target of the Chick tracts than Muslims. The tracts, for instance, accuse the pope of being the antichrist – the feared Servant of Satan in Christian literature.

The tracts even go as far to say that the Roman Catholics actually fabricated the Islamic religion and the Koran in a bid to dominate the minds of many, and to turn these people against Israel.

In another mind-blowing accusation, the tract “Story teller” depicts how the Jesuits, a male order of the Roman Catholic Church, ordered a Muslim to shoot Pope John Paul II to guilt-induce the Muslim world and unite them to the Catholic faith!

Apparently, this tall tale originated from one Alberto Rivera, an anti-Catholic religious activist. None of his claims has been substantiated.

It is easy to see why the Singapore government has chosen to ban the sale of these tracts on local shores. The ideas and beliefs presented within are enough to make even strict Bible Literalists cringe.

Furthermore, the visual attractiveness of the tracts, the over-simplification of facts, and the frequent appearance of children in these comic strips mean only one thing: impressionable kids — or simple-minded adults — are one of the main targets of these tracts.

Such fundamentalist Christian propaganda should not be tolerated because they are destructive to society and the human intellect. I find it regrettable that Mr Ong and his wife were taken in wholesale by the messages in these booklets, despite Judge Neighbour having once characterised them as intelligent adults.

A lesson in sensitivity and common sense

While it would seem that this saga has come to the close, the recent media spotlight has made some Christians uncomfortable. Some believers might feel that the media is placing them under siege.

First, the Aware saga, and now this incident. And as an interesting subplot, MyPaper recently reported that some polytechnic students are unhappy that Christians have been going around proselytising in schools.

But the good thing is that there are no accusations of a Chick-style conspiracy against the church so far. Fortunately, churches like Westboro Baptist Church are non-existent in Singapore. Even if there are such churches, they must have remained quite well hidden.

And besides, few serious-minded Christians in Singapore would take these tracts seriously, that is, if they care to scrutinise them in the first place.

While it is somewhat commendable that these Christians are pro-active in living out their beliefs and engaging the public square, all three groups – the Aware ex-exco, the couple, and the student evangelists — display a fundamental flaw with their approach: the lack of utter common sense.

It is amusing how some Christians are still going pair-by-pair to hard sell their religion when there are already enough tissue-sellers, peddlers, and insurance agents on the streets. Street evangelism no longer works, and they should get over it.

In fact, such insensitive approaches of intruding into another’s private space do not only destroy the multi-religious harmony in Singapore, they destroy the reputation of their own religion. Instead of winning converts, their actions have the opposite effect — they frighten people away from Christianity.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

LTA awards $210m contract for 2 MRT stations to Chinese firm debarred by World Bank

It was reported in the media today (10 Dec) that LTA has…

SDP chief points S'pore govt serious missteps led to second wave of COVID-19 outbreak, urges S'poreans to think independently

The Government made three serious missteps that placed the lives and health…

日10岁小女孩访问港示威者 “了解真相应与当事人对话”

根据日本WBS电视台报导,指一名小学四年级学生岛津知佳,于14日从日本千里迢迢来到香港国际机场,只为了要与当地示威者对话,了解他们抗争的动机。 香港反《逃犯条例》的集会仍在持续,特别是本周一和周二,示威者聚集香港机场办“接机”集会,希望能向来往游客阐述香港情况。不幸在周二晚仍演变出现混乱情况,有示威者涉及殴打两名中国籍男子。 随后香港机场管理当局向法庭申请临时禁令,禁止任何人在机场内参与任何示威、抗议活动。不过,据了解仍有零星示威者聚集机场,有者手持标语向旅客道歉。 和香港集会有关的报导,也引起这位日本小女孩的兴趣,但她坦言,她并不清楚抗争运动的背景,认为直接和当事人了解十分重要,而决定到香港作实地考察。 于是,在爸爸岛津宽司的陪同下,拿着事先准备好的问题,以英语询问现场示威者他们参与集会的目的。虽然偶尔会被拒绝,但知佳未感到气馁,而是继续寻找受访者。 一些示威者则告知她,不想看到香港失去自由;有者则表示抗争并不是为了要独立,他们也感谢小女孩的支持。 而知佳在接受WBS电视台采访时表示,虽然一开始会感到紧张,但他希望能汇集示威者们表达的意见,帮忙宣传出去。  


日前,世界各地传出有康复者二次感染的症状,包括香港、荷兰、比利时等。对此,上海复旦大学附属华山医院感染科主任张文宏表示,人类短期内难以通过疫苗达到群体免疫,故即使疫苗面世,在未来数年内仍须保持常态化的防疫态势。 继香港传出全球首宗二次感染的病例后,荷兰及比利时各有一名康復患者再度染疫,引发全球关注。此次二次感染患者包括香港33岁男子,于四月中康复出院,惟本月欧洲旅游后,再对病毒呈阳性;荷兰的二次感染患者为一名老人,其免疫系統虛弱;而比利时一名女子则在首次确诊后,三个月左右再度染疫。 对此,上海复旦大学附属华山医院感染科主任张文宏表示,人类短期内难以通过疫苗达到群体免疫,而且针对香港出现的二次感染病例,指该病例是个别案例,非一般意义上的复阳,需进一步观察再感染患者是否成为常态。 张文宏也表示,再感染关乎免疫的持久性,也关乎未来疫苗保护的时间和重复接种的间歇时间。全球目前有2千200多万人曾感染,假如再感染成立,那么在冠病高发和流行地区,再感染或成为常态。不过他也指出,目前四种较常见的冠病病毒,感染后免疫时间都超过4个月。 而荷兰病毒专家科普曼斯则表示,早已预料会有二次感染,认为要观察有关情况是否经常发生。比利时病毒专家范德兰斯特则指,女患者两次感染的病毒菌株差异,“足以称得上是不同的病毒株”。 他解释,这名患者首次确诊时只有轻微症状,“那么你身体产生的抗体较少,不足以保护你免受第二次感染”。