Dear Sir,

I refer to the report: “TOC Report: 150 call for vote of no confidence” by Choo Zheng Xi.

I write this letter in response to two objections I have about what the author of the article wrote. :

1) Christian Fundamentalism

Firstly, I object to the pigeonholing of AWARE ex-co members as “Christian Fundamentalists”, a term which the author employs in his article. After quoting a statement by Angela Thiang about her stance against homosexuals, Mr Choo then makes the logical leap (and a huge one that is) in the very next line to conclude that AWARE is now run by a group of “Christian Fundamentalists.”

I take issue with making this huge leap because (i) nowhere in the article is there suggestion or evidence that the ex-co is now Christian fundamentalist, (ii) an anti-homosexual stance does not equate to Christian fundamentalism.

True, Jenice Chua and Angela Thiang had both previously attracted attention for their anti-homosexual stance. But is that evidence of Christian fundamentalism? Is that a good ground for labelling them as such? How is the Author sure that they are Christians in the first place? And even if they are Christians, why must they be pigeonholed as being “fundamentalist” as opposed to “misguided” or “uninformed Christians” or “Christians who may not be totally familiar with Christ’s teachings as a whole.”

Attaching the “fundamentalist” label on them just results in tarring public perception of their reputation because “fundamentalist” as a term carries with it a negative connotation. A glance through some of the comments on TOC using the search function to look for the term “fundamentalist” would perhaps make this point of mine much clearer.

Mr Choo needs to be more aware of the implications of using certain terms before using them loosely as he has done.

2) Christianity and Regressiveness

The second grouse I have is Mr Choo’s quoting of the Glass Castle Magazine’s editor, Jolene, whose view is that Christian fundamentalism leads to effects that are “regressive to women’s rights.”

Firstly, I think that there must be more justification on Mr Choo’s part first to show why Christian fundamentalism leads to a regression in terms of women’s rights. Simply putting a quote there will not do. Again, we see here a large logical leap that it unjustified. It seems as though the Author has made the erroneous assumption that Christianity is against women having rights or worse, that Christianity leads to a diminution of women’s rights – both of these are untrue.

Many questions follow from his quoting of Jolene’s views:

– What is the Christian stance on women’s rights?

– Does it in the first place negatively affect women’s rights or does it promote women’s rights?

– Is Mr Choo even aware of how Christianity views the issue of women’s rights? If he does not, is he therefore justified in making such an equation between Christianity and regression of women’s rights?

One perspective that I hope Mr Choo will consider is that Christianity holds women in high regard. The Bible affirms that women are equally valued, equally treated and share the same divine image of men. Husbands are to love and honour their wives just as they love themselves. Let it also not be forgotten that the Biblical accounts of Christ’s resurrection sees women as the first ones at the empty tomb. 

From this and from other articles on the TOC website, it seems to me that TOC is trying to side with the old committee of AWARE. Based on what Mr Choo wrote and based on the lack of evidence, it seems very contrived for him to try and link the new committee to anti-homosexual and “Christian fundamentalist” stances, both of which are deeply dividing terminologies.

Concluding, I wish to urge against the use of such divisive labels such as “fundamentalist” as it is unhelpful in promoting civil discourse. Even if one believes bona fide that someone is a “fundamentalist,” perhaps there are other less offensive terms that can and should be used.

Yours Sincerely,

Tang Shang Jun


Editor’s note:

TOC apologizes for any offence caused by the terminology employed in the article in question and highlights that it was not our intention to criticize the Christian community as a whole. 


Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

为无障碍斜坡项目与蔡荣良交锋 毕丹星称提出“体制上问题”

本月15日,工人党阿裕尼集选区议员毕丹星,以选区内一个无障碍斜坡工程项目为例,道出反对党选区议员提出项目提案,还得经由基层顾问检视、批准的弊病。 “一个简单、数月就可完工的无障碍斜坡,搞到要几年才完成。有多少乐龄人士、行动不便人士或康复者,无法从这类设施受益?” 他质疑行动党如何决定人民协会在反对党选区运作?也抱怨反对党议员提出的提案,往往都被人协忽略。 他认为,败选的前行动党候选人,可以继续透过这类提升项目与居民保持关联性,甚至可以说是在大选前的拉票,作为基层领袖他们也有权通过分配大笔纳税人公帑。毕丹星说,早在2015年大选,他就已非议行动党实施的这种政治双重标准。 至于阿裕尼集选区基层组织顾问蔡荣良,在本月19日发文反驳,表示对毕丹星对于上述无障碍斜坡项目发表不实言论“感遗憾”,也质疑后者借此事转移对工人党市镇会官司的注意。 在帖文中他指出,不管是人协、公民咨询委员会(CCC)、还是反对党议员,服务人民不应有所区分。 “但针对近期法院判决,我被许多居民询问,现任市镇会过去八年做了什么。与其执念于网上辩论,我呼吁所有人记住我们应以国人为优先,且更专注在问责他们的工作。” 对于有关无障碍斜坡,他解释那是公民咨询委会,在阿裕尼和后港选区展开的的社区翻新项目之一。 他也认为居民也应该看到自2015年大选以来,好些项目都已由公民咨询委会完成,如后港第一道118座组屋的有盖衔接走廊等。至于政府推展到阿裕尼集选区新捷运站、房屋改善计划(HIP)、邻里重建计划(NRP)等都让当地居民受惠。 “无障碍斜坡也由友诺士CCC提议” 蔡荣良更指出,有关无障碍斜坡也是由友诺士CCC提议的,“既然如此,那为何友诺士CCC还会刻意延迟项目?一旦获批,就一定会和人协确保项目完工。”借此反驳毕丹星指因为是反对党的提案所以延迟的说法。 他澄清有关斜坡是在2018年12月施工,并在今年移交给市镇会,惟间中确实承包商有要求再展延时间,不过就像其他CCC的项目,只要问题解决都会在合理的时间内完工。…

Singaporean film-maker hypothesises how China can easily take over Singapore by 2050

Renowned local film-maker Martyn See took to his Facebook on Sunday (21…


虽然年过八旬,但老人仍秉持着不靠别人,用自己的双手过活,经营杂货店。 日前,有网友在脸书上发文吁请大家纷纷伸出援手,帮忙老人,不过据义工组织“Mummy Yummy”的贴文解释,老人实则不需要大家援助,但大家仍可前去探望他,或是买点东西“帮衬”老人家店铺的生意。 为了支持老人的生活,网友纷纷“出动”到老人店里购买货物。老人对于瞬间变成“网红”,也感到受宠若惊。 网友此前分享老人的照片,当时正孤坐在杂货店前,望向远方,而店铺两侧则大门深锁,看似相当可怜。 网友也指出,老人直到深夜都仍未收档,因此欲请网友出手相助。网友也在文末表示,尽管老人看似不富裕,但仍依靠自己的双手赚钱,并非选择用乞讨的方式。 帖文发出后,也立即引起网友的关注,不少网友留言心疼老人,年纪大了仍无法退休,也有网友佩服老人迄今仍依靠自己的双手赚钱。该帖文也获得逾2万次转载。 据《8视界》报导,老人姓黄,于1976年开始在861号桥北路巴刹和熟食中心的杂货店做生意,每天早上6点多开档,下午约3、4点才慢慢收档,风雨不改。 至于他的家庭,他也表示,自己并没有孩子,妻子也在十多年前过世,如今和一名老友合租一间一房式的租凭租屋同住。 针对店旁两侧的店铺,黄老先生也解释因为照片的缘故,让网友纷纷觉得店铺两侧的商店已倒闭,但其实不然。 “其实没有啦,我右边这个店是卖咖啡粉的,下午才开档;左边这些店上午就收档了,就变成好像只有我一家店在开门做生意。” 黄老先生也说,虽然自己的生意并没有因为照片流传而大幅增加,但在这一两天内,确实有很多人到访,不仅在买东西时没有讨价还价,反而给了他很多钱。…

Lawyer reveals “News Consumption Survey” commissioned by MCI containing potentially politically-linked questions

A recent “News Consumption Survey” commissioned by the Ministry of Communication and…