Breaking News: CEO of DBS, Richard Stanley, who was reported to have leukaemia in January, has passed away.

Khairulanwar Zaini

The Geylang Serai temporary market was a somber place when I visited it yesterday. Surrounding two foreign workers helping the cleanup efforts were the shuttered food stalls. The cleaners were scrubbing the floors between the empty tables.

Looking grim too were some stall owners who were present. The cleanup, originally slated for next week, had been brought forward by the Geylang Serai temporary market’s management in response to the recent food poisoning incident. Most stall owners were receptive of the cleanup efforts, underlying the much needed confidence of customers who have concerns about the hygiene conditions of the market.

Restoring confidence

After the mass poisoning, the tenants – including those from the wet market and textile shops – were subjected to stringent checks by the NEA officers; the food stalls at the hawker centre were accorded the most attention, with the health officers thoroughly going through the various nooks and crannies. Mr Wahab, a chicken rice seller, said that the NEA officers, whom he claims spend an average time of 10 minutes on each stall, also advised the stall owners to throw away any unnecessary items from their freezers to avoid any potential contamination.

Although it may mean two days of loss income, most of the stall owners present were appreciative of the long-term benefits that this clean-up can bring. “It will restore the confidence of our customers,” said a neighbouring chicken rice seller, Madam Lin, 52. Mr Salim, who was tending to his textile shop, said that even though he does not sell any consumable food items, the clean-up effort was a step in the right direction. It will ensure that customers are “not in uncertainty and are fully confident that not only are the food stalls clean, but the entire Geylang Serai temporary market is clean too!”

Many stall owners took the opportunity to go beyond the recommended NEA guidelines. A couple of them were seen layering a fresh coat of paint to the pipes and walls of their stalls, out of their own expenses and despite being only two months away from a move to the new Geylang Serai market. Madam Hasinah, who sells nasi padang, hopes that with the new paint, her stall is not only clean, but looks presentable as well.

Why was cleanup not done earlier?

However, many raised concerns that the clean-up should have been done with more regular frequency. Madam Hasinah took issue with the “sudden” manner the spring-cleaning was brought forward; she received notice from the management committee about the new cleanup dates only a day before, on Tuesday morning. Her husband criticized the knee-jerk nature of the change of dates, saying that it was undertaken “only after something has happened.”

Pak Wan, a vegetable stall owner from the wet market, recalled that these washings were done once every two months at the previous wet market.

The stallholders all confirmed that this is the “first time [a] 100% check” is done since the temporary market was established, save for minor NEA initiatives such as an anti-cockroach campaign held six months ago which did not entail any stall closure.

While Pak Wan suggested that the cleanliness of this temporary market was better than at the old market, Mr Wahab said that “each stall should be responsible for their own hygiene and cleanliness standard”, particularly with the wet market separated only by a narrow corridor. He said the presence of raw vegetables and food attracted pests, although he was reassured by the new double-storey market which will separate the food stalls and market stalls on two different levels.

Moving forward

The stall owners were not concerned that this incident may adversely affect the collective reputation of the market. Their regular customers do not seem unduly worried, they said. Madam Hasinah said she still “received orders despite the closure.” However, one mee goreng seller, Mr Sadik, expressed his reservations. He said that his business has been affected and that he was finding it hard to “get new customers.”

Madam Lin expressed a desire to move on from this unfortunate episode, although she admitted that it will be difficult given the severe fallout, particularly for the families affected. Mr Wahab expressed sympathy for his fellow stall owner, whom he said was “unlucky” after “40 years of selling” without incident; although he agreed with the need for a punishment, Mr Wahab was also against depriving completely the rojak seller of the only livelihood he has known for four decades.

The question on Singaporeans minds now is: how much of the blame should NEA bear for the market’s filthy conditions? Now that lives have been lost, the knee-jerk cleanup might just be too little too late for the families of the deceased.

Headline picture from the Straits Times.

Other pictures by Khairulanwar Zaini.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

”外籍专才“酸国人“懒”工作被抢? 大华银行急澄清非雇员

有”外籍雇员“竟敢酸国人因为懒惰,所以工作才被印度籍人士取代? 有网民在本地社交媒体hardware zone,截图一名”外籍专才“的评论,该账号署名”Amit Verma“,评论内容大致如下: ”你们非常种族歧视!何必去提外籍人士的签证问题?没有其他国家会以这么明显排外主义的方式报告(外籍人士)比例!如果Singapoo国人不懒惰,那么我们印度人就不会取代你们的工作…请给予印度籍雇员尊重!“ 这截图马上再网络疯传,有者便肉搜,发现”Amit Verma“在大华银行(UOB)工作,且职务栏上填“副主席”(Vice President),于是直接在脸书要求大华银行解释。 网民Felix Ng表示,作为大华银行客户,当国人被称为”Singapoo”,形同是在羞辱国人,乃至于这是令该银行蒙羞。为此,他要求大华银行需彻查,有关贴文是否属实,会否对这名雇员采取行动。 大华银行也很快作出回应,澄清上述 “Amit…

Increased political competition raises the bar for the ruling party

~ By Dr Chee Soon Juan ~ The SDP National Healthcare Plan…

【冠状病毒19】6月4日新增517例确诊 包括15社区病例

根据卫生部文告,截至本月4日中午12时,本地新增 517例冠状病毒19病例确诊。 新增病患大多为住宿舍工作准证持有者。今增 15例社区病例,其中两人是本地公民或永久居民,其余13人是工作准证持有者。 这些社区病例,都与早前确诊病例有关联,且属于无症状患者,当局为他们进行检测以进行确认。 本地累计确诊病例已增至3万6922例。当局仍在搜集病例详情并将在晚些时候公布。

ST quoting Edelman’s survey: 67 per cent of Singaporeans trust the Government

Quoting the 2019 Edelman Trust Barometer survey, local media, the Straits Times…