Breaking News: US President-elect Barack Obama appoints Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State. (Fox News)

Benjamin Cheah / Andrew Loh

Each town council has the duty to explain to its residents how it invests its funds, what is its philosophy, what are the risks it takes.

– Mr. Mah Bow Tan, Minister for National Development.(Straits Times)

Mr Mah added:

And demonstrate that it has made those decisions in a manner which is fair, reasonable and which residents would agree with.

Senior Minister of State for National Development, Grace Fu, made similar remarks when she was asked about town councils’ investments:

We should ask the town councils and it is something the residents should pose to their respective town councils. (Today)

The Online Citizen (TOC) decided to put the ministers’ words to the test.

On November 25th, TOC urged readers to write in to the town councils’ chairpersons, using a template letter, to enquire about the town councils’ investments. It has been a week since and twenty-two such letters have been sent out via e-mail to 13 of the 14 PAP town councils. (No letter was sent to East Coast GRC town council.)

Of these, a grand total of three replies were received (as at 2300 hours, Monday, Dec 1).

Below, quoted in full, are the replies we have received thus far. The first is from Mdm Cynthia Phua, Member of Parliament for Aljunied Group Representative Constituency.

Thank you for your interest on Aljunied Town Council. I have noted that you are a private estate resident. The Aljunied Town Council manages only HDB estates. We noted that the questions that you are asking are similar questions circulated to all the Town Councils. You may wish to access to [sic] www.Aljuniedgrc.sg for some of the information.

The second is from Mr. Inderjit Singh from Ang Mo Kio GRC, quoted here ad verbatim:

We have full transparency of all town council accounts. We publish and annual report which is submitted to parliament and is easily available for public to see. Also, we put up details on our TC notice boards. All the other questions can be easily answered by looking at he town council act which show who are qualified and who is responsible for managing things.

I am sure you will get all the answers you need from the above.

The third reply is from the Public Relations Officer of Hong Kah GRC:

We have redirected your query to the attention of our Finance Department. They will look into your query and give you a reply as soon as possible.

The first reply is disingenuous; it answers nothing. The second is remarkably incomplete. The third well, is “re-directed” to the finance department.

Mr. Singh says that the Town Council’s accounts are fully transparent, and the annual reports are available for all to see. But TOC cannot even find the words ‘Lehman Brothers’ in these reports. Of the Town Councils Act, the only useful titbit was that Town Councils may invest their funds “in accordance with the standard investment power of statutory bodies”.

Mr. Mah has charged the Town Councils with a duty to explain how they have invested their funds. The two replies from the MPs, mentioned above, are not explanations; they are, instead, excuses for excuses in lieu of answers.

But at least Aljunied, Ang Mo Kio and Hong Kah town councils have replied to the queries. What about the other town councils?

One of those who wrote to question his town council had been doing so since 29 October. It was only after four weeks, four emails (including three reminders to the town council) that he received a reply. And what was the reply?

The Town Council has uploaded our latest Annual Report, a copy of our reply to the forum page as well as FAQs on the Town Council Investments on our website…

The letter writer was so furious that he wrote back, “This is, by any standards, a very low level of service response. I have yet to require any other form of assistance from the Town Council, but if this is a gauge,” he said, “then I dread the time when I would need to rely on your services.”

Right to answers

Elected representatives are answerable to their constituents. Elections are not meant for people to choose their own dictators or for their elected representatives to behave like one. We have chosen our Members of Parliament, and as they are not answering our queries about such an important matter in which millions of tax-payers’ dollars are at stake, they have shown that they are not doing the jobs we have chosen them to do, even though they have signalled their willingness to do so by joining a political party and running for elections.

It is our right to expect, and demand, answers from the people we have chosen to lead our communities and represent our interests. It is nothing less than their duty.

But so far, our MPs have not done their jobs.

The next step

The continued non-answer replies from both the co-ordinating chairman of the 14 PAP town councils and from the PAP MPs themselves are making a mockery of our two ministers who, effectively, have openly and publicly called for the town councils to explain to residents their investments.

So far, reporters, residents and netizens have asked Dr Teo Ho Pin, co-ordinating chairman of the PAP town councils, and the PAP MPs to account for their investments’ losses or profits.

None have provided any meaningful or substantive answers.

Even Straits Times forum letter-writers are not fooled by Dr Teo’s beat-about-the-bush antics.

… no mention was made of how town councils intend to make good on the loss and avoid repeating this anomaly. If it cannot be recovered, do we write off the millions as extraordinary expenses like a business concern? Whether town councils are to be treated as non-profit or business entities, Dr Teo should be more open with HDB home owners who, as stakeholders of estate funds, have the right to know.

It seems that even ministers’ words mean nothing to PAP MPs, and ministers’ public statements are not taken seriously. In the end, our ministers are made to look like fools – by their own MPs.

Please continue to e-mail your TCs and demand answers. Please cc a copy of any and all replies to us, to enable us to keep track of responses. Singaporeans deserve accountability from our constituency managers – and not be brushed aside.

And Members of Parliament should be more forthcoming in being transparent and accountable to those who voted them into Parliament. This is the very same thing which Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong urged residents in Hougang to do with the Hougang Town Council run by the Workers’ Party MP, Mr Low Thia Kiang:

In Hougang, let us keep Mr Low Thia Khiang on his toes. He is responsible for running the Hougang Town council. But unlike Parliament, town councils do not have open meetings where members from other political parties can question their performance. So, in Hougang, you have to be creative to be an effective opposition. Amongst the things you can do, I suggest you study the annual accounts of the town council to ensure that the funds are properly used. (Sprinter)

Why then are SM Goh’s own party colleagues keeping mum about their town councils’ investments?

In the next article, TOC does what the Town Councils have advised – to take a look at their annual reports.

——————–

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Doctor hopes that Healthcare Services Act 2020 will better address whistle-blowing in the healthcare

In a letter published on the Straits Times (ST) forum today (28…

严燕松吁降低保健储蓄使用限制 助年长者偿还医疗费用

医疗费用向来是国人关注的课题之一,其高额医疗费用更是成为国人沉重的负担,尤其是长期与慢性疾病抗争的患者或老人。 阿裕尼选区议员严燕松呼吁,政府降低保健储蓄的使用限制,帮助年长者减少以现金偿还的医疗费用。 严燕松于本月4日的国会发言中,以中文演说提到,许多居民曾向他抱怨有关昂贵的医疗费用,甚至因高额医疗费用而选择不复诊,导致病情恶化。 “一旦病患的病情恶化到必须住院的情况,不管是对病患或者是对我们的医疗系统来说,负担都会增加。” 为此,他也提议将所有其他慢性疾病一并列入保健储蓄的可知支付项目中,并让60岁以上的年长者免去提款限额,以此减轻年长者的医疗费用负担。 国人受苦于高医疗费用 高额医疗费用在我国一直都是争议不断的课题,网络上也不时看见受医疗费用影响的案例。尽管我国的医疗服务水平获得世界的认可(新加坡中央医院(SGH)因其临床研究和卓越的护理服务,被美国《新闻周刊》(Newsweek)评选为全球第三最佳医院),然而却伴随着高医疗消费,让人民叫苦连天。 根据世界银行的数据,我国的医疗自付医疗费用竟高达36.7巴仙。虽然透过政府津贴和增加健保计划(Medishield)赔额,上述占比有所下降,但人民的自付率仍高于其他国家。 工人党不仅一次提及有关高额医疗费用的问题,工人党成员陈贞贞曾在本届大选期间呼吁,调低自付额和共同承担额,并不设限10万元额度,以确保人民能够负担其医药费。 她当时表示,坊间一直流传“能死不能病”,人民生活愈发困苦,尽管终生健保能够给付大部分医药费,但其设限在10万元,与此同时,病人仍需承担多达10巴仙的费用。 淡马亚也曾表示,目前保健储蓄户头(Medisave)、全民健保費用(MediShield Life)、保健基金(MediFund)均仅占整体医疗费用的15巴仙,而剩下的医疗费用则交由政府补助、雇主自主和自付,而后两者所需付的费用也愈来愈高,因此新加坡需要一个简简单单的通用支付系统。

Animal clinic collects wheel-clamp release fee of $300 despite not being authorised

Parked your car in a private space and had your car wheel-clamped?…