Update: Parliament rejects motion to fine-tune electoral system. “PM Lee said Singapore must never blindly follow others.” – Channel NewsAsia. NMP Siew Kum Hong, who helped with the poll, mentioned the poll results in Parliament today.

Watch the video of Mr Siew’s speech here – TOC TV.

The following is a media release by The Online Citizen to the local media.

Singapore, 27 August 2008 – Internet portal The Online Citizen (www.theonlinecitizen.com) today published the results of a street poll on the question of whether a by-election should be held in the Jurong Group Representation Constituency (GRC), with 60.1% of all respondents who had an opinion saying that one should be held.

Dr. Ong Chit Chung, a Member of Parliament (MP) for Jurong GRC, passed away on 14 July 2008. Since then, the Government has stated that the law does not require it to hold a by-election, and it does not intend to do so. Instead, the remaining four MPs for Jurong GRC will take turns to cover for the duties of the late Dr. Ong.

Two Nominated Members of Parliament, Professor Thio Li-Ann and Dr. Loo Choon Yong, have filed a motion for Parliament to debate the question of when a by-election should be held. This debate is expected to take place over 26 and 27 August 2008.

The Online Citizen decided to conduct the street poll, to ascertain what Singaporeans actually thought. A team of volunteers conducted the poll on 23 August 2008, in different parts of Jurong GRC. The findings of the poll are enclosed.

A total of 478 Singapore citizens were polled, of whom 312 (65.3%) were residents of Jurong GRC and 166 (34.7%) were not. 122 respondents (25.5%) did not know whether a by-election should be held. Of the remainder, 214 (44.8% of all respondents, or 60.1% of those with an opinion) stated that a by-election should be held in Jurong GRC, while 142 (29.7% of all respondents, or 39.9% of those with an opinion) disagreed.

Of the 312 residents of Jurong GRC polled, 85 (27.2%) did not know whether a by-election should be held. 129 residents (41.3% of all residents, or 56.8% of those with an opinion) thought that a by-election should be held in Jurong GRC, and 98 (31.4% of all residents, or 43.2% of those with an opinion) did not think so.

Of the further 166 persons polled who were not residents of Jurong GRC, 37 (22.3%) did not know whether a by-election should be held. 85 non-residents (51.2% of all non-residents, or 65.9% of those with an opinion) felt that a by-election should be held in Jurong GRC, and 44 (26.5% of all non-residents, or 34.1% of those with an opinion) did not think so.

“We decided to do the poll because no one was doing it – getting the opinion of the people most involved or affected by the way their constituency is run, the people of Jurong GRC,” said Andrew Loh, Deputy Editor of The Online Citizen. “Although it was a simple poll of 2 questions, it gives a reasonable feel of what the people of Jurong GRC think about the issue of having a by-election there, in the wake of the passing of one of its MPs, Dr Ong Chit Chung. 478 Singaporeans is a decent number to poll, considering our very limited resources.”

The Online Citizen hopes to work on more projects of such nature, to directly convey the true opinions of Singaporeans on the ground.

About theonlinecitizen.com

The Online Citizen is a blogsite run by volunteer Singaporeans sharing their views and experiences on current affairs and issues of concern.

FINDINGS OF STREET POLL CONDUCTED BY THE ONLINE CITIZEN ON 23 AUGUST 2008

SHOULD THERE BE A BY-ELECTION IN JURONG GRC?

Executive summary

On Saturday 23 August 2008, theonlinecitizen.com (TOC) conducted a street poll to find out Singaporeans’ views on whether there should be a by-election in Jurong GRC, in light of the passing away of Member of Parliament Dr. Ong Chit Chung.

The key findings of the poll are as follows:

§ <!–[endif]–>A total of 478 Singapore citizens were polled, of whom 312 (65.3%) were residents of Jurong GRC and 166 (34.7%) were not. 122 respondents (25.5%) did not know whether a by-election should be held. Of the remainder, 214 (44.8% of all respondents, or 60.1% of those with an opinion) stated that a by-election should be held in Jurong GRC, while 142 (29.7% of all respondents, or 39.9% of those with an opinion) disagreed.

§ <!–[endif]–>Of the 312 residents of Jurong GRC polled, 85 (27.2%) did not know whether a by-election should be held. 129 residents (41.3% of all residents, or 56.8% of those with an opinion) thought that a by-election should be held in Jurong GRC, and 98 (31.4% of all residents, or 43.2% of those with an opinion) did not think so.

§ <!–[endif]–>Of the further 166 persons polled who were not residents of Jurong GRC, 37 (22.3%) did not know whether a by-election should be held. 85 non-residents (51.2% of all non-residents, or 65.9% of those with an opinion) felt that a by-election should be held in Jurong GRC, and 44 (26.5% of all non-residents, or 34.1% of those with an opinion) did not think so.

Methodology

A team of volunteers hit different parts of Jurong GRC to ask Singapore citizens two questions:

1. Are you a resident of Jurong GRC?

2. Dr. Ong Chit Chung passed away recently. Do you think that there should be a by-election in Jurong GRC?

Only answers from respondents who identified themselves as Singapore citizens were recorded. No answers were recorded from those who identified themselves as not being Singapore citizens. Respondents were not asked to verify their citizenship.

The poll was strictly anonymous, and no personal particulars were recorded. There was no systematic sampling of respondents, and selection of respondents was entirely random.

There was no attempt made to ensure, and TOC does not represent, that the sample of respondents used by the poll was statistically valid and/or representative of Singaporeans or any other group. To the extent that there was any choice in the location of the polling, it was only to maximize pedestrian traffic for pollsters to approach.

Detailed results

The following tables set out the detailed results and findings of the street poll:

TABLE A

Breakdown of respondents

Total

%age

Singapore citizens

478

100.0%

Residents of Jurong GRC

312

65.3%

Non-residents of Jurong GRC

166

34.7%

TABLE B

Residents and non-residents of Jurong GRC combined

Total

%age

Responses to question: “Do you think that there should be a by-election in Jurong GRC?”

478

100.0%

Yes

214

44.8%

No

142

29.7%

Don’t know

122

25.5%

Only considering “Yes” and “No” responses

Total “Yes” and “No” responses

356

100.0%

Yes

214

60.1%

No

142

39.9%

TABLE C

Residents of Jurong GRC only

Total

%age

Responses to question: “Do you think that there should be a by-election in Jurong GRC?”

312

100.0%

Yes

129

41.3%

No

98

31.4%

Don’t know

85

27.2%

Only considering “Yes” and “No” responses

Total “Yes” and “No” responses

227

100.0%

Yes

129

56.8%

No

98

43.2%

TABLE D

Non-residents of Jurong GRC only

Total

%age

Responses to question: “Do you think that there should be a by-election in Jurong GRC?”

166

100.0%

Yes

85

51.2%

No

44

26.5%

Don’t know

37

22.3%

Only considering “Yes” and “No” responses

Total “Yes” and “No” responses

129

100.0%

Yes

85

65.9%

No

44

34.1%

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

防范非洲猪瘟 台今日起对狮城、马、印、汶入境旅客行李检疫

据台湾中央社报导,台湾非洲猪瘟中央灾害应变中心宣布,基于非洲猪瘟疫情仍在亚洲扩散,从今日起将针对来自马来西亚、新加坡、印尼和汶莱入境旅客,进行手提行李检疫。 据报导,台湾桃园机场目前已针对12个国家和地区,直航入境台湾的旅客,进行手提行李百分百X光机检查。 上述12地区涵括:中国大陆、香港、澳门、越南、寮国、柬埔寨、缅甸、泰国、朝鲜、韩国、俄罗斯和菲律宾。 尽管新加坡、马国、汶莱和印尼并未出现非洲猪瘟疫情,但台方应变中心表示,此乃为防疫超前部署,呼吁旅客全力配合,以防堵疫情扩散。 应变中心称,如被查获携带来自非口蹄疫疫区新加坡的猪肉制品,罚款新台币一万元起(约442新元),携带来自印尼、汶莱和马来西亚这三个口蹄疫疫区的猪肉制品,罚款三万元起(约1千328新元)。 该应变中心也提醒旅客,不要携带含肉制品的月饼入境,以免受罚。 另一方面,据越南媒体报导,越南全部63省市均已发现非洲猪瘟疫情,越通社在上月21日报导,指该国全境已扑杀生猪超过400万头。 非洲猪瘟是由非洲猪瘟病毒感染猪引起的一种急性、出血性、烈性传染病,以高热、内脏器官严重出血和高死亡率为特征。非洲猪瘟不是人畜共患病,该病毒不会感染人类。

Dyson abandons its electric car project as it’s not “commercially viable”

In a shocking statement released on Thursday evening (10 October), British technology…

雅虎编辑点评王瑞杰:多磨练

雅虎新闻编辑Nicholas Yong,昨日发表一则社论,阐述他个人如何看待副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰在本周二(5日)于国会提呈动议,辩论时与工人党议员等人交锋时的表现。 ”手忙脚乱,还掉了球。不管你喜欢用哪种体育形容词,在周二的国会上王瑞杰似乎都做到了。“ 本周二,王瑞杰提出动议,要求刘程强和林瑞莲回避一切和阿裕尼-后港市镇会相关财政事务。原本球就在他手上,这场赛事等着他表演。经过长达一小时的严厉说教,他理应和总理和82位行动党议员一起,来个大灌篮。 尽管动议最终在52票赞同、九位工人党议员反对下获得通过,但是在动议开始进行的前数分钟,王瑞杰就不得不要求”暂停“。当工人党议员林瑞莲,甚至是相对温和的后港议员方荣发质询时,他看起来筹措不定,像个要做课堂报告的学生般翻查着档案。 “即便方荣发不是天才演说家,然而他让58岁的财政部长显得措手不及。” 王瑞杰要求休会的理由?“因为林瑞莲…提到由我提出有关观点不妥当,故此我要求休会,让我们考量此事后再作答复。” 就这样,策略被颠覆了。国会复会后,由律政部高级政务部长唐振辉等人接手,对阿裕尼-后港市镇会判决左右开弓,然而已无法补救王瑞杰的开球。 Nicholas Yong在评论中认为,尽管行动党仍占据绝对主导地位,然而立法议会仍是辩论公共利益课题的重要平台。不论辩论的素质如何,国会始终是一个政治舞台,这是全球历史悠久的传统。 与英国下议院或美国众议院相比,新加坡国会的气氛较温和,但仍会出现激烈交锋和火花。 仅报业控股和新传媒可看国会直播…

Criticisms posted on Balakrishnan’s Facebook page deleted

Comments by members of the public criticising Vivian Balakrishnan on his Facebook…