Announcement: We have disabled the views count feature as it does not accurately reflect the number of views for each article. We have been experiencing some technical defects recently since our number of hits spiked on the day of the PM’s National Day Rally speech. Readers have also informed us of some difficulties they face in certain areas. We are looking into them and hope to rectify the defects as soon as we can. We ask for your patience and we offer our apology.

The following is a media release from a group of Burmese nationals in Singapore.

Groundless non-renewal of key immigration and work documents of Burmese Patriots by Singapore immigration and manpower authorities.

Background

Since the Saffron Revolution of September 2007, the Burmese anti-junta movement has gained remarkable momentum in Singapore, fuelled by the increasing frustration and discontent of the Burmese people in Singapore at the outrageous atrocities committed by the Burmese military junta.

Burmese patriots in Singapore work as one united group to raise awareness about human rights violations by the Burmese junta, advocate for free and democratic Burma, and stand in solidarity with the freedom and democracy movements inside Burma as well as around the world.

Some of the notable milestones are the peaceful protest along Orchard Road on 20th November 2007 during ASEAN Summit and the “Vote NO” Campaign for the sham referendum on the military-drafted, new constitution for Burma during late April and early May 2008. These activities were not only effective in raising awareness about the injustice committed by the Burmese Junta and the true desires of the Burmese people but also lawful in Singapore.

The political objectives of the Burmese activists have always been to advocate political change in Burma and their guiding principle is to use peaceful as well as lawful means in Singapore while expressing themselves. Indeed, none of the anti-junta political activities of the Burmese activists has ever been declared unlawful or in conflict with the local sensitivities by the Singapore government. Apart from receiving a police warning for their participation in the Orchard Road anti-junta protest, the Burmese activists have never been charged for any unlawful act while pursuing their political objectives.

Non-renewal of key immigration documents

Since July 2008, many Burmese patriots in Singapore have been denied renewal and extensions of their visas or permits by Singapore’s Immigration and Checkpoint Authorities and the Ministry of Manpower for no reason or explanation. In a span of just over two weeks, 6 Burmese patriots have been affected, and 3 of them have been forced to leave Singapore to date.

There is no evidence that the 6 affected Burmese patriots have ever committed a crime against the law in Singapore. No reason or explanation has been given by the Singapore Immigration and Checkpoint Authorities for rejecting the renewal and extension of the visas and permits of these Burmese patriots. In the eyes of the Burmese patriots affected, the rejections appear arbitrary and without rationale.

Statement of intent

We, Burmese patriots, are releasing this press statement to publicly inquire:

– The underlying reasons for the apparently arbitrary rejections by Singapore authorities.

– Whether the Burmese activists have been rejected for their peaceful political activism.

– Why the Singapore government unfairly ill-treated the Burmese activists despite its declarations of support for peaceful political change in Burma.

Myo Myint Maung

Ngwe Zin Soe

——————–

Details of the press conference to be held this afternoon:

Date: 22 August 2008 (Friday)

Time : 3.00pm to 5.00pm

Venue : Lilac Room, Level 5, Peninsula Excelsior Hotel

————

PROFILES

The following are the profiles of the 4 out of 6 affected activists and the details of their cases.

Ngwe Zin Soe

Occupation: Assistant Engineer

Type of visa/permit: PR Re-entry Permit

Related agency: ICA

Since her graduation from Temasek Polytechnic in 2003, Ngwe Zin Soe has been working in an

Engineering company with a Permanent Resident (PR) status in Singapore. Considering her PR Re-entry Permit would expire on 11th September 2007, she went to ICA on 21st July 2008 to apply for its

extension as Re-entry Permit can be extended within 6 months prior to the expiry date. At ICA, Ngwe Zin Soe was told that her permit could not be extended immediately and she would be contacted at a later time. It is an unusual delay because PR Re-entry Permit extension can be processed usually within 30 minutes. However, no reason was given for this. To date, she has yet been contacted by ICA in regard to her application.

According to ICA, “a Singapore Permanent Resident (SPR) who wishes to leave Singapore must obtain a Re-Entry Permit (REP) to enable him/her to return to Singapore as a SPR. A SPR who remains outside Singapore without a valid REP will lose his/her SPR status.”

Maung Soe Thiha

Occupation: Student (recently graduated from NUS in 2008)

Type of visas/permit: Social Visit Pass & Employment Pass

Related agency: ICA & MOM

Since the expiry of his Student Pass on 17th May 2008, 8 days after the completion of his studies at NUS, Maung Soe Thiha was living on a Social Visit Pass to look for a job. According to a bond between him and MOE, he has to work in Singapore-registered companies for 3 years upon graduation in return for his receipt of MOE Tuition Grant.

About two weeks after his receiving a degree scroll at NUS Commencement, his application for long-

term Social Visit Pass was rejected by Immigration & Checkpoints Authority (ICA) through a letter dated 24th July 2008, which his sponsor received on 26th July 2008. On both 28th July 2008 (Monday) and 29th July 2008 (Tuesday), he approached ICA officers to ask for the reason of the rejection as he had valid reasons to remain in Singapore – to seek employment in order to serve his bond. No reason was given.

In the morning of 30th July 2008, the day when his Social Visit Pass expired, the flight to Cambodia he intended to take was missed by him because of the delay caused by an unreasonably long checking of his passport by an immigration officer at the airport. He was later told that his passport was alright, but no reason was given by the officer for checking it so long. Eventually, he was given a Special Pass for one-day stay in Singapore with the requirement that he leaves Singapore from Changi Airport.

In that time of dismay, he got a job as a project engineer at Hai Yong Engineering in the afternoon of

30th July 2008. An application for Employment Pass was done for him through EP Online System around 1:30 pm on 30th July 2008. With his employment letter, Maung Soe Thiha then went to ICA to appeal for the extension of his Social Visit Pass until the outcome of his EP application would become available.

That appeal was outright rejected by ICA; however, again, no reason was given.

Maung Soe Thiha left for Cambodia on 31st Jul 2008 and his application for Employment Pass is still pending after nearly three weeks so far.

Myo Tun

Occupation: Construction worker

Type of visa/permit: Work Permit

Related agency: MOM

On 30th Jul 2008, the extension of Myo Tun’s Work Permit Pass, which expired on 1st August 2008, was rejected. As per normal, Work Permit extensions are applied in batches by his company. Out of 5 or 6 applicants in his batch, Myo Tun was the only one left out by MOM for rejection without any apparent reason.

Myo Tun left Singapore on 2nd August 2008 and is currently staying in Thailand.

Hlaing Moe

Occupation: Technical Supervisor

Type of visa/permit: S Pass & Social Visit Pass

Related agency: MOM & ICA

Hlaing Moe had been working as a Technical Supervisor in Sankyu (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., since 17th July2006 on S Pass when his application for the renewal of his S Pass was rejected on 17th July 2008 according to the letter from MOM. There was no reason given for the rejection and his company was still willing to employ him further. On 21st July 2008, he submitted an appeal letter to MOM for reconsideration, but it was again rejected on 25th July 2008 without any reason given.

After the cancellation of his S Pass, he received a Social Visit Pass to stay in Singapore until 5th August2008. He is studying part-time for Diploma in Technology (Mechanical) at Ngee Ann Polytechnic and in his 5th semester there so far. Since he had then upcoming exams during 14th August 2008 to 24th August 2008, he appealed to ICA on 29th July 2008 to extend his Social Visit Pass until he would have finished sitting the exams. Despite his valid reasons for staying in Singapore, the appeal was outright rejected for no given reason.

Hlaing Moe left Singapore on 5th August 2008 and is currently staying in Malaysia. During his stay in Malaysia, he applied for Singapore visa in order to sit the exams that have started since 14th August 2008. It was finally approved on 20th of August 2008 in the evening, just two days before this press conference, but it was too late for him.

———–

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

“挑动群众斗群众”伎俩遭踢爆 港媒吁慎防免转发假消息

香港民众反逃犯条例仍在持续,但是已引起中港台和全球中文圈民众对香港情势的两极化激烈讨论。有者支持港民群众运动坚持撤回条例修法和释放示威者;但亦有评论非议示威群众持续抗争。 支持建制派和反修例两派人士,在舆论界的辩论亦十分激烈。然而, 香港传媒亦踢爆,有者拍摄“伪示威者”现身说法批斗父母的视频,企图把示威者皆抹黑和标签为“不孝”、“反国反港”罪名,分化群众以制造“群众都群众”的优势。 据香港打假脸书专页“求验传媒”揭发,本月6月21日,一个声称“Louis Yuen”的男子在一段视频中,声称自己参与了6月9日及6月12日反送中游行,然后发表了一段有关父母的言论。片段中他没有提供任何证据,以证明他有参与上述游行,也没有提供任何自己的背景资料。 “Louis Yuen”质疑连日抗争只是年轻人却不见上一代,认为是父母已不爱子女的表现。 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=erP5IsjwvNA 求验传媒就揭发, 这名男子发布该片段的FB 专页“Louis Yuen”是在6月15日成立,至今只有28个赞和43个追随者。 然而,虽然原版本已经删除,然而建制派、亲政府平台或媒体“如获至宝”,许多经过修改的版本遭广传,以偏概全将“Louis…

Accept that Singapore has the world’s lowest fertility rate

Last Friday a Straits Times article said Singapore’s total fertility rate plunged…

本地日本餐厅用餐妻染沙门氏菌 网友发文控诉餐厅不负责任

妻子吃了本地日本连锁餐厅食物后感染沙门氏菌,导致腹痛发烧逾一周,网友控诉餐厅不负责任。 一名网友Marc Wong在脸书上爆料,13日与妻子在樟宜机场板长寿司(Itacho Sushi)享用晚餐,未料却成为妻子的噩梦。 网友表示,妻子在隔日开始出现发烧腹痛的症状,但也不以为意,认为只要吃药便会好起来。 岂知到了15日,妻子并未如逾期好起来,症状仍然持续,便到诊所打针吃药。不过,病情却未出现好转,反而发烧腹痛症状愈发严重,即日送入安微尼亚山医院接受治疗。 经医院诊断,妻子感染了沙门氏菌,医生也证实引起感染的缘由为食用未煮熟的肉类或海鲜。 网友形容,接下来的三天,由于腹痛持续,妻子过着相当痛苦的日子。 网友也称,妻子在前几日的饮食中,唯一一次食用未煮熟的食物就是来自板长寿司,于是他便致电给板长寿司质问,却得来令他错愕的答案。 板长寿司声称,“可能并非是我们的错,因为她属于个别案件,所以我们不会负责。” 向新加坡食品局投诉 随后,他也向新加坡食品局投诉,但当局并未给出详细的答复,仅在口头上表示将针对该餐厅采取行动。…

Fines, compositions, revocation of work passes: Are these just or legal punishments?

by Teo Soh Lung I spent several hours trying to read and…