The following was sent to TOC by Mr Alton Tan. It is a reply to PAP MP, Dr Lam Pin Min, on the P65 blog. TOC thanks Mr Tan for allowing us to re-publish it here.

Dear Dr Lam,

I refer to the article, “New formula for public transport fare revision to be out this week” (The Straits Times, 1 July 2008).

More ERP gantries, higher ERP charges. Taxi surcharges have gone up, and taxi companies may be implementing a fuel charge soon. The latest news? Fares on public transport will be increased. I sometimes really wonder how “public” is Singapore’s public transportation system. They are private companies with management who only focus on profits, profits, and more profits.

Let me quote you an example. A few years ago when the North East line (NEL) was officially opened, several bus services going towards the city were terminated from my area. These services were basically from the Serangoon and Hougang depots (e.g. 111, 106, 501, 502 etc), reason being it wasn’t profitable to run these bus services along the same route as the NEL. Why? The NEL is owned by SBS Transit.

But removing these services adversely affected those people who do not live near a NEL station. Travelling to Shenton Way or Orchard Road used to be just a 15-25 minute ride away from my house (I live along Boundary Road/Ang Mo Kio Ave 1) with express bus services 501/502. Now, it takes me 45-60 minutes to hop on a bus and switch to a train to get to town. Would you now rather drive or take a bus? If 501/502 were still serving the Boundary Road stretch, I would gladly take them. It would only be a 20 minute ride along the expressway.

I have a simple question to ask: wouldn’t these bus services ease the heavy crowds on trains and other bus services if they were reinstated?

Is the Public Transport Council trying to improve the public transportation system, or is it thinking of profits for the public transport companies only?

With the inflation rate at an all-time high and still rising, raising public transport fares now will be a big blow to low/middle income families. Will the Government only finally step in when low/middle income citizens resort to bicycles as a form of transportation and public transport becomes nothing but a luxury for the poor? Will cars, trains and buses be restricted to only the rich and higher income families? Maybe one day roads in Singapore will be for cars only and only one lane on the road will be allocated to citizens’ vehicles and public buses because only the elite can afford to drive.

I am writing this because I really feel for lower income families. I am currently working part time as I will be leaving to go overseas to further my studies soon. I currently only earn $1200/mth and after deducting CPF, I am left with $1000. After deducting my daily expenses and bills, I am left with $400. I really salute those low-income families who can raise a family with a pay similar to mine (and I am only supporting myself). I hope that in 2010 when I return to Singapore, I will not see more beggars on the street begging for money, or senior citizens stalking tables at hawker centres collecting empty drink cans or cardboard.


A sad Singaporean


Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

王瑞杰:续为国人创造好的就业机会 但我国仍需要客工

副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰表示,已在讨论如何提升建筑环境领域,但我国仍需要依赖外籍劳工。 王瑞杰接受《亚洲新闻台》专访,询及是否需要检讨对客工的依赖时,他表示尽管政府会继续为国人创造好的工作机会,以此减少对客工的依赖,但我国仍免不了需要依赖客工,去做许多新加坡人不愿意做的工作。 他指出,数码化的发展确实可以提高建筑环境部门的生产率,也能够弥补当地劳动力不足的问题,而且在建筑领域中被视为需要更多以劳力活动为主的工作,事实上,该领域也涵盖不少薪资优渥的工作,其中包括建筑师、工程师、绘图员、项目经理等。 王瑞杰也表示,近日受到疫情爆发的影响,也不仅让人重新审视对于客工劳动力的依赖。 询及是否会采取任何检讨或计划以重新审视对外籍客工的依赖时 ,王瑞杰则说,目前国内的劳动力处于不足的状态,加上随着人口老龄化的问题愈发严重,我国的劳动力也会随之下降。 提升建筑环境作业 他表示,目前也连同国家发展部张黄循财和社会及家庭发展部长兼国家发展部第二部长李智陞,讨论如何提升建筑环境领域,减少劳动工作的比重,但他也指出,无论如何,达成这目标终有上限,我国仍需依赖相当多的客工来到我国完成新加坡人不想做的工作。

MND releases report on town councils; AHTC claims MND’s wording potentially lowers public esteem of AHTC

The Aljunied-Hougang Town Council (AHTC)’s corporate governance has shown an improvement —…