From Reporters Without Borders:

Reporters Without Borders today condemned a case brought by the authorities under the Sedition Act against blogger Gopalan Nair, a 58-year-old American lawyer, who criticised the Supreme Court’s handling of a defamation case.

Nair, who allegedly emailed a judge to criticise her handling of the high profile political case, has been held in custody since 31 May. His trial is set for tomorrow and he faces up to three years in prison and a fine equivalent to nearly 2,400 euros.

“We urge the authorities to drop charges against Gopalan Nair, who has only exercised his right of free expression. This charge is improper and will add to the intimidation of bloggers and Internet users who express themselves about Singapore’s political life”, the worldwide press freedom organisation said.

Nair is accused of sending an email to Judge Belinda Anq Saw Ean telling her that she had mishandled a defamation case pitting former Singapore prime minister Lee Kuan Yew and his son, the current prime minister Lee Hsien Loong, against the leader of the Singapore Democratic party (SDP) Chee Soon Juan and his sister, Siok Chin. These last two were today sentenced to 12 and 10 days respectively in prison for “contempt of court”.

“We express our solidarity with Chee Soon Juan and Siok Chin wrongly charged with defamation. We call for their immediate release. This sentence only confirms our opinion that Gopalan Nair was providing a news service on his blog by showing how this case was conducted,” the organisation added.

Nair denied having emailed the judge and said that all his publications on the trial hearings were posted on his blog. He had particularly criticised the final day of the trial, during which Lee Kuan Yew reportedly said that he wanted to sue all Internet users who were guilty of defaming him online.

In an article posted on his blog on 30 May, Nair said: “There is no doubt in the Singaporean sense, I have defamed him and his Prime Minister son, not only in my last blog post but in almost all my blog posts since my blog’s inception in December 2006”. He also gives the name of the hotel in which he is staying and the telephone numbers where he can be reached.

Nair was arrested in Singapore on 31 May for “insulting a public servant” under Article 13D of the Miscellaneous offences Act, because of his criticism of the judge. His lawyer learned today that Nair is being charged under the Sedition Act (http://statutes.agc.gov.sg/). His blog remains accessible in Singapore.

He worked in Singapore for ten years before leaving for the USA in the 1990s and is an active member of Singapore’s Workers’ Party (http://www.wp.org.sg/party/history/1991_2000.htm) and stood at parliamentary elections in 1998 and 1991. He took US citizenship in 2005.

—————–

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Former NMP Calvin Cheng feels it’s “unbelievable” for SDP’s Dr Paul Tambyah to say people don’t have to be worried about fake news, but could he be wrong?

Recently, TOC sat down and interviewed Dr Paul Ananth Tambyah, chairperson of…

加班工酬纠纷 五名巴士司机状告新捷运

五名巴士司机分别状告本地巴士业者新捷运(SBS Transit),指责后者违反加班工酬条款,支付不足工酬。 Carson律师楼律师拉维(M RAVI),在上周五代表上述巴士司机提呈传讯令状,内容有关这些起诉人指控该公司“违反合同上的加班费条款,且支付不足薪酬”。 律师拉维认为,有关诉讼也将探讨有关雇佣合同在休息日和加班工酬方面,是否涉及违反《雇佣法》。 至于新捷运企业沟通副主席Tammy Tan则在昨晚向本社证实,上述五名巴士司机经由Carson律师楼提呈的诉状,并正与律师商讨,有意针对相关指控进行辩护。 这些司机已在该公司任职三至10年不等。在上周五提呈的诉状中,也提及其中四名司机,曾向推事庭提呈类似的诉讼。尽管在今年7月和八日,出席了两次与国家交通工友联合会(NTWU)和康福德高的会谈,不过他们认为控诉和报告未受到重视。 原告也申诉到劳资政纠纷调解联盟(TADM),也被转介给职工总会(NTUC)。不过基于没有得到“结论性的答复”,他们向新捷运发函,要求解释每月薪资明细。 “尽管当时新捷运同意这些司机在两日后回函,不过此后没有再收到任何回复,于是他们再向新捷运连发四封追问邮件。” 诉状中提及的控诉,包括原告指责他们被预期在休假日之前,可以“连续7日工作无休”,这不符合双方同意的聘任书,故此可能违反《雇佣法》36条,即员工理应每周获得休息日,或者值班超过30小时理应获休假。 原告也指控被要求“每周工作超过44小时”,也违反《雇佣法》规定的法定工时。…

What does the U.S. Federal Reserve’s coronavirus rate cut mean for you?

by ValueChampion In an effort to stem the economic and financial impacts of…

绿色和平组织轰印尼政府执法不力 导致林火问题延续

印尼森林山火危机仍在持续,甚至严重影响当地生态与各国,印尼绿色和平组织(Greenpeace Indonesia)抨击,尽管事态严重,但自2015年至2018年,10家涉及焚烧大片森林的油棕公司并未受到行政或民事制裁。 此外,印尼政府也不曾因森林山火而吊销任何公司的油棕种植许可证。 “自2015年起,印尼政府本就应将遏制森林火灾再度发生作为首要工作,但实际上的结果显示,他们在打击这些企业上,只有空泛的承诺与出尔反尔的执法行动,所以吁请总统佐科威,马上撤销所有制造火灾的公司的许可证”,印度尼西亚绿色和平组织森林倡议人员陶菲克(Kiki Taufik)说。 绿色和平组织根据官方记录进行分析,发现在2015至2018年期间,逾340万公顷的土地被烧毁。 政府声称要应对火灾的同时还要兼顾执法,实属困难,但显然分析结果明显与政府所说有所差距。目前烟霾已经在过去两周内影响了邻国。 “为何造成严重火灾的10家企业,没有一家受到总统佐科威的严惩?为什么要豁免这些造成严重灾害的公司?很不幸的是,是因为政府并不重视执法,这也是为什么火灾会再度燃烧起来”, 陶菲克表示。 另外,绿色和平组织早前也揭露,因非法采伐与造成森林火灾的公司,尽管被政府向民事法庭起诉后,却没有一家偿还过罚款,截至今日,其欠款总额已高达12亿美元。 印尼森林山火不仅仅是普通火灾,更是对无论是生态、健康还是经济都有着重大影响。世界银行曾估算,2015年的森林山火已造成印尼损失160亿美元,其中来自各方面如林业、农业、旅游业以及其他行业的亏损。另外,烟霾导致数十万人患上呼吸道与其他疾病,据悉,可能带来逾10万人过早死亡。 在生态方面,因烟霾制造了每日1130万吨碳排放量到大气层中,其数字甚过整个欧洲联盟的碳排放量。…