In the Straits Times report titled, “Subsidies cannot solve problems: MM”, MM Lee Kuan was reported to have said the following about Singaporeans asking for subsidies to help with the rising cost of living:

As long as we have a dynamic economy, we can solve our problems. Subsidies cannot solve them.

I read the newspapers and the simplest thing is to write and say, subsidise. Rice, oil, bus fares, even putting seat belts on school buses. That is the surest way to go downhill.

Multiple subsidies have led to a welfare system that has trapped Europe in slow growth. Europe’s welfare systems have lowered incentives for people to strive and to excel.

We can’t grow tapioca, or corn; we can’t compete in making Nike shoes or sewing gowns. We have to move up to more complicated jobs and services.

We have to earn enough money by working hard and smart in manufacturing and services to pay market prices for food, rice, wheat, maize, vegetables, fruits, fish, meats, chicken and eggs.

The Government must ensure that everyone has the highest-paid job he is qualified to do. If his salary is below the minimum for a decent life, the Government will top up with Workfare.

Let us be grateful that we have long-term stability and therefore continuing high-value investments and good growth.

————-

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Bank robbery suspect arrested with assistance from Royal Thai Police

The Singapore Police Force has just announced that the the suspect involved…

李总理:莫散播公积金提款年龄变更假消息 “否则被泼马对付”

我国总理昨日(18日)晚上发表2019年国庆演说时,借机抨击社交媒体上散播有关政府将改变中央公积金提款年龄之流言。 在新加坡总理公署官网上发布的演讲稿中,李显龙总理提到,“我在这里要绝对明确地补充到,我们不会对公积金提款年龄做出任何改变。你仍然可以在55岁时提出部分的公积金,而且你也可以在65岁时取得公积金入息” 。 “这一切都将保持不变。因此,请忽略你所听到的任何谣言,或者在WhatsApp生流传的谣言,因为这都是假新闻。” 他昨日在演说时吁请,“请你删除有关谣言,并告诉你的朋友,不要将有关谣言分享给更多朋友,并混淆他人,因为这是假消息”。 “这将会抵触《防止网络假消息和防止网络操纵法案》(POFMA,简称防假消息法)而被捕。” 现场观众都给予热烈掌声。 获罪者将被判入狱10年 《防假消息法》于今年4月首次在国会上提出一读,随后在5月9日通过,政府强推该法,声称是为了遏制假信息的散播,避免衍生各种乱象,破坏国家和社会安全,为国家公共利益带来负面影响。 根据法案内容,内阁部长有权利断定信息的真假,并且发布要求更正、撤下有关信息的指令,甚至在部长给予理由的情况下,可以要求屏蔽网站。 该法案一经提出就立刻吸引社会各阶层的关注,纷纷表达法案恐限制言论自由、形成寒蝉效应的忧虑。 一旦被确定触犯有关法案,可被判入狱不超过10年,或巨额罚款。…

DPP wants lawyer to personally pay costs for acting on clients’ behalf

By Andrew Loh In a move which may have “a chilling effect”…

淡马锡狄澜袒护“廖文良对狮城有贡献” 惨遭各界挞伐

廖文良指控前女佣巴蒂偷窃案,在上周刚获得高庭法官平反。法官在判词犀利抨击,廖家父子报警可能存在“不当意图”,巴蒂有充分理由投诉人力部,而廖家“先下手为强”将他开除。 昨日(8日),有媒体针对此案,询问淡马锡控股国际执行董事狄澜(Dilhan Pillay),廖文良上述行为,是否有违淡马锡的价值观?集团会否检讨此事? 对此,狄澜如是回应:”有许多人不论是在公共或私人领域,都对新加坡和我们社会作出贡献,廖文良是其中一位,他在嘉德置地、樟宜机场集团和盛裕集团的业绩都证明了这点。“ 然而他的这番言论马上引来各界的挞伐,其中《海时》前副总编辑默乐(Bertha Henson)揶揄,原来要权衡一个人的诚信,也要纳入他所谓成就衡量? 人民之声党领袖林鼎也形容,这让人看起来似乎廖文良的友人,在尝试维护他。狄澜甚至希望众人能听各方说法,不要武断下定论。然而本身曾是一名律师的林鼎也道出,当高庭法官陈成安作出判决,就表示案件已告一段落,所有受制于新加坡法律的人士都需遵守。 人权律师张素兰对狄澜的言论亦不敢恭维,直言有别于在客工组织情义之家的义工,樟宜机场集团主席是有优渥报酬的。若淡马锡持续忽略廖文良一事,民间积累的愤怒只会更高。 “如果淡马锡误以为群众的愤怒会自然消散,那真是令人失望。” 至于在《海时》官方脸书,亦不乏各路网民抨击狄澜的言论,认为不管这个人对国家过去有多少显著贡献,都不能成为可豁免他过失的理由。没人能凌驾于法律之上。 网民Eunice Seah…