According to the Department of Statistics (Ministry of Trade & Industry) Singapore’s total population in 2006 stands at 4,483,900.

Resident population (S’pore citizens & S’pore PRs) is 3.6 million.

The ethnic composition is:

Chinese = 2,713,200 (75%)

Malays = 490,500 (14%)

Indians = 319,100 (9%)

In the same report, the resident population grew by 1.8% annually – on average.

Non-residents’ growth is much higher at 9.7% annually – also on average.

Singapore has 875,500 non-residents in 2006.

The government announced that they have revised the Concept Plan of 2001 – which catered to a population of 5.5m, to one which would consider a population of 6.5m instead.

Many Singaporeans have taken this revision to mean that the government is targeting a population of 6.5m – to be accomplished in 20 years. This means that another 2 million people will be added to our island.

(National Development minister Mah Bow Tan has since clarified that Singapore is not targeting a 6.5m population.)

But the lingering uneasiness among Singaporeans remain.

From a population of just about 1.9million in 1965 (Singapore’s independence year) to a population of 4.5million in 2006, and then to one of 6.5million in 2027, it is an ambitious plan indeed.

In a period of 60 years, Singapore will have increased its population 3 fold – if indeed the government is targeting a 6.5 million number in 20 years.

What does this mean for Singaporeans?

To be sure, adding people to the island is not just about adding people to the island. Things are not as simple as that. We will have to ponder on many issues which such a plan throws up. However, in this article the focus is on just one of these issues – integration of foreigners into our society.

Integration

Leaving all the other issues aside, including the fundamental one of whether raising the population size is necessary in the first place, the most important question we should pay attention to is the integration of foreigners into our society. For without successful assimilation, everything falls apart.

It is people or human interaction with one another that will make or break such an ambitious undertaking. One will have to commend PAP MP Cynthia Phua for bringing up an important point in parliament recently which illustrates, at the ground level, the presence and emergence of certain sentiments. To quote her:

“I walk the ground and I listen to the people. As it is, I hear people talking about: ‘Do you realise that the Kwan Im Temple is now beginning to be overwhelmed by Chinese nationals? Soon it will no longer be a gathering point for Singaporean worshippers.’ This is an innocent remark, but it says a lot about what’s happening around us as well as the inner feelings of the people who are used to niche areas where they are so used to call their own.”

As the Singapore population ages, it is of paramount importance that singaporeans have a genuine sense of belonging – to the places, cultures, sights and smells of the country they grew up in. We must avoid allowing sentiments of ‘xenophobia’ to take root which will truly make for uncomfortable living – both for locals and foreigners.

But at the same time, we should also understand why some Singaporeans would feel threatened by the presence of an increased number of foreigners, especially when – in the words of Ms Phua – “niche areas… where they used to call their own” are being “invaded” by foreigners.

Our past experiences

What we have on our side is 40+ years of peaceful co-existence between the races and the different cultures and religions. Hopefully, we have learnt much from these and use the knowledge and experience to live peacefully again with new immigrants – just as our own forefathers were immigrants.

But what we should be aiming for is genuine, comfortable living with those who are different from us, and not about tolerating them which was the government’s theme for Singaporeans of different races living together, in past years.

“Tolerating” somehow has a connotation of ‘limitation’ – until we run out of tolerance. This should not be so if we ourselves are genuine about embracing globalization.

The merits of globalization

Globalisation has its merits and not just economic ones. Globalisation gives us an opportunity to interact, learn and live with other citizens of this same planet we live on. And although we may be anxious about our economic prospects such as jobs and careers and business, to allow these to overshadow the positives of globalization would be a shame, really. For a people advances and progresses not so much because of the products they produce but the human interaction, exchange of ideas and understanding in living together.

In other words, it is how we treat others that determines how we ourselves are treated and the kind of people we are, or want to be – and the resulting society that we will live in.

How do we achieve genuine interaction

At the end of the day, the government can do everything they feel is necessary to integrate new immigrants but it is the man in the street, the heartland dwellers, the ordinary Singaporean who will play the biggest role.

At the moment, from news reports, the RCs are welcoming foreigners into HDB estates with gatherings and small welcoming parties. Although this is a good start, there is more which can be done. I am not sure how the RCs go about it but perhaps they could provide more publicity to such events and get more ordinary Singaporeans from the estates to take part.

I would suggest that instead of these parties being targeted at foreigners per se, perhaps they should instead be termed “community day” where all residents, and not just foreigners, are invited to participate. This way, locals won’t feel that the grassroots organizations are more interested in welcoming foreigners than caring for Singaporeans.

The government’s IRCC (Inter-Racial Confidence Circles) and Harmony Circles initiatives should also be expanded to include foreigners who may practise religions or beliefs which are different from singaporeans’ beliefs or practices. As an example, foreigners may not understand or appreciate why Chinese Singaporeans burn joss paper at certain times of the year within HDB estates or at their HDB blocks. Harmony Day in schools should also be practised in international schools in singapore – if they’re not already.

Educating the foreigners is as important as asking Singaporeans to welcome them. The effort should be two-way instead of just focusing on how to make foreigners comfortable. And so, the grassroots organizations (GROs) have a very important role to play in this respect.

We should avoid, at all cost, foreigners creating their own enclaves and insulating themselves from the local Singaporean – especially foreigners who live within HDB heartlands’ housing estates.

A fine balance

An important point to always keep in mind is that while the government (and Singaporeans) extend a welcoming hand to foreigners, Singaporeans themselves must not be made to feel “second-class”, or feel disadvantaged or worst of all, discriminated against.

Thus, the government can and must do more for Singaporeans – in terms of demarcating and making distinctions where Singaporeans are appreciated. For example, Singaporeans must always have priority in housing, jobs and the sharing of economic benefits.

Another area is male Singaporean feeling increasingly uneasy about serving National Service and the disadvantage (or perceived disadvantage) in doing so in terms of how doing NS can affect their careers and jobs prospects. The feeling is that as the number of foreigners increase, the question of being disadvantaged in serving NS will become more pronounced. The government must keep this in mind and see if there are ways to address this issue.

DPM Wong Kan Seng’s announcement in parliament of a Citizenship Day is also a step in the right direction in the effort to “celebrate their common identity as singaporeans” . (Straits Times, March 2, 2007)

Embracing globalization at the ground level

For all the talk and focus on the economic benefits of globalization, the real test of how this will be successful is at the ground level – the human-to-human interactions between those who come from afar and those who have called this place home all their lives.

Thus, globalization will only work if it is successful at the local level – your personal relationships with your foreign colleagues, in your heartlands and in your local community. We must always keep this in mind as we create and install new policies.

What we should not expect is that we will achieve integration, genuine integration in the short term. It will take some time before we see this, perhaps a few decades. In the meantime, there will be instances where problems will arise.

It will be a fine balancing act for the government in the years ahead – with Singaporeans at the ground level playing the most important part.

Read also: Can Singapore’s multi-racial fabric cope?

Leading photo from JVSS blog.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

NSP gets a boost to election campaign

by Andrew Loh The National Solidarity Party (NSP) has received a boost to…

清洁工、爱猫居民合力照料 造小床让猫咪歇息

爱猫脸书专页Sayang Our Singapore’s Community Cats日前在脸书上分享暖心事,有爱猫居民为组屋底层出现的社区猫制造猫床,让猫咪能够安心睡觉。 据网友指出,该猫床是由爱猫人士为它们制作,加上清洁工也非常喜欢猫。 照片显示,爱猫人士将橱柜当作猫咪的小家,橱内还放置蓝色的猫床,让猫咪能够安心休息,有些角落则以椅子或窗帘当作猫咪的家,甚至还为他们取名。 网友也表示,猫的床单也会定期更换。 针对为猫在组屋底层角落设置猫床,网友表示,这是他看过离组屋最近的猫群,同时也感谢社区和清洁工能够允许他们安置猫咪在组屋内。 帖文一出也引起网友的关注,截至目前已获得1千赞,227转载。许多网友也期许,组屋底层可以允许猫咪休息,并希望能够在各个组屋内实行。 对此,发出帖文的网友则回应,他们和清洁工,以及一些爱猫居民在经过几年努力,才能安置猫咪,同时也会有爱猫居民定期清理粪便和呕吐物,确保居民与猫咪能够共处。 只有共同合作,才能让居民和流浪动物共处,且也能减少流浪动物一些不可预期的行为,造成居民的困扰。

本地新增70冠病确诊病例 累计确诊802起

根据新加坡卫生部文告,截至本月28日中午12时,本地新增70起冠状病毒19确诊病例,其中41人为入境病例,29起为本地感染病例,其中15例与早前病例有关联。 这意味着本地累计确诊病例达到802例。与此同时今日再有15人出院,累计治愈人数198人。仍有420人需留院治疗,大多情况稳定或有起色。 不过,有多达19病重病患需待在加护病房。至于182名康复良好,惟冠毒测试仍呈阳性反应的病患,则转到则转移到泰和国际医院、伊丽莎白医院以及乐怡度假村隔离设施。迄今死亡病例保持在两例。 凤山Sparkletots幼园感染群增至26例,再添一起病例(第746例,38岁男公民),相信是校长(第601例)的家属。迄今该幼园有16教职员,以及10名校长家属被感染。 多佛国际学校感染群,则新增一人,是第761例的36岁南非女子,工作准证持有者。该感染群累计八人被感染。 至于昨日公布的新邮政中心新感染群,再增两人确诊(第740例和第796例),分别是25岁中国男子和26岁马国男子,都是工作准证持有者。 上述41名新增入境病例,分别前往美国、法国、英国、越南、印尼、马来西亚、老挝、土耳其、葡萄牙等地。 38人是本地公民、长期准证和工作准证持有者,另外三人是短期访客,分别是一名52岁澳洲男子、21岁印度籍男子,以及一名国籍待核实的22岁女子。 当局也指出,尚有14本地新增病患与此前病例没有关联,仍在进行追踪调查。 今日出院的15病患中,包括在10日公布的其中两名曾前往法国马赛(Marseille)公干的空军人员,分别是第165例(30岁男子)和第173例(31岁男子)。