by Dark Matter

What is the GST Offset Package going to do for Singaporeans? To answer this question, the Ministry of Finance prepared a table to illustrate the benefits the package provides.

The table is reproduced here for public reference:

Table 1: Impact of GST Offset Package on Households


The following table is some calculations derived from Table 1:

Table 2: Derived Information of Impact of GST Offset Package on Households

If we divide the Total Benefits from GST Offset Package by Additional GST Payable Annually, we get values of 16.17 and 1.46 for HDB 1 RM and Private House and Flats households respectively. How these figures are related to the values 19 and 2 for respective households in Number of Years of Additional GST Payable that is offset by the GST Offset Package is a puzzle.


Lower income groups are not earning enough to cover expenditure

The next point worth noticing is that the low income groups have their annual household expenditure exceed their annual household income (with GST offset benefits included).

In fact, the report Trends in Household Income and Expenditure, 1993-2003 had shown that lower income groups are not earning enough to cover expenditure as early as 2003.

They will have to spend every cent they receive from the GST Offset Package and get some additional financial assistances elsewhere to make ends meet. How is it possible for them to set aside the GST Offset Package to pay for the additional GST payable in the next 10 to 15 years is another puzzle.

Given that low income families need to depend on various government assistance programs to make ends meet, including the GST hike, it may not be meaningful to say if the GST hike is a regressive tax or not. It is more like a way to fund another set of “Progress Package” for the next four years.


The Workfare Income Supplement (WIS) Scheme

The Straits Times articles “Workfare: Not an ideological shift, just economics” and “Rewarding work” (Feb 17, 2007) provide some interesting insights into the Workfare Income Supplement Scheme.

“The significance of Workfare lies in this statement made by Second Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam: ‘For the first time, the state will be supplementing the market wages that low-income workers receive.’


The statement recognises there is a gulf between the income needed to live decently in Singapore and the income a ruthless market dictates. The state has decided it needs to bridge the gulf.”


There is a need to make sure workers earn enough to live a decent life. This is the principle behind the idea of Minimum Wage (or Living Wage as some call it).The Singapore People’s Party and the Singapore Democratic Party are two proponents of the Minimum Wage idea.


While the government rejects Minimum Wage law as the way to go, it acknowledges the need to help with market oriented schemes like training fund and programs that help workers to acquire skills to earn higher wages and Job Redesign schemes to raise their productivity and pay.


The move to have a permanent wage supplement scheme is a more direct way to address the need. But, why is the government doing it now? Is it a sign that existing schemes have their limitations, like they do not work as well as expected or they do not work for some low income workers?


The Income Supplement Scheme is seen as a better approach than Minimum Wage law:


“SMU economist Pang Eng Fong added that supplementing incomes makes more economic sense than having a minimum wage which distorts the labour market.


‘Workfare does not change employers’ costs, and is simply a system to transfer resources to the most vulnerable members of society, and is therefore much more targeted than a minimum wage scheme.”


With Minimum Wage law, individual businesses will have to absorb the cost burden first and then pass on the cost to businesses and customers they serve. Some will bear a heavier share while others bear little. On the other hand, funding wage supplement via consumption tax like the GST will spread the cost across society. Individual businesses are not heavily impacted and those who are able to consume more bear a bigger share of the cost.

As such, the Workfare Income Supplement (WIS) Scheme has a better funding mechanism. However, the scheme that “benefit 438,000 Singaporeansand cost about $400 million a year over time” is a disappointment. The scheme is only offering low income workers $913.24 a year (or $76.10 a month) on average, with a larger share going to the CPF. It falls far short from doing enough to help low income workers “live decently”.


No “ideological shift”

The fact that the main share of the state’s ‘supplementing the market wages that low-income workers receive’ goes to CPF shows how cautious the government is. It can be seen as a step in turning ad hoc CPF top-up exercises we see over the years into a regular top-up scheme. The cash portion of the WIS scheme hardly produce any impact. The difficulty of making ends meet will continue to push workers to find ways to move up the wage ladder.

So, it is fair to say that there is no “ideological shift” in government policy. What we have is a more formal and structured mechanism of funding and distributing financial assistance to low income workers. It may also mean that the government acknowledges that the low income groups need long term attention, and hence a formal and structured funding mechanism.


Here is how the rest of the figures in Table 2 are calculated:

Annual Household Expenditure:

Dividing Additional GST Payable Annually by the 2% GST hike.

Annual GST offset benefits:

Dividing Total Benefits from GST Offset Package (over 5 years) by 5.

Net saving / debt:

Adding Annual Household Income from work and Annual GST offset benefits and minus Annual Household Expenditure.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

本国男子承认替中国收集情报 内政部称未对我国安全构成威胁

根据内政部调查显示,日前在美国承认为中国情报部门收集情报的新加坡籍男子,未对我国安全构成直接威胁。 美国司法部24日宣称,新加坡籍男子杨俊伟(Dickson Yeo Jun Wei译音),承认自2015年至2019年期间,以顾问公司为掩护,替中国向美政府及军方人员套取情报。 他被控作为“外国特务”,从事非法行为,初期以其他亚洲国家的目标为主,其后专注于美国。 2018年,杨俊伟成立一家虚构顾问公司,他开始寻找掌握非公开信息的美国军方或政府人员,聘雇他们撰写报告,付2000美元给上钩对象,要他们交出报告。 其中还包括“一名参与空军F-35B匿踪战斗机计划的文职人员”、“一名国防部官员”、“一名曾在阿富汗服役的国防部军官”,杨会声称这是他亚洲客户要的资料,但事实上是交给中国政府。 2019年11月,杨俊伟飞抵美国时被捕,华盛顿法院将在10月9日作出裁决,他面临最高10年监禁刑罚。 内政部:并未对我国安全构成威胁 对此,内政部昨日也回复媒体询问,指杨俊伟目前并未对新加坡安全构成直接威胁。 内政部发言人也补充说:“新加坡人应遵守他们到访或居住国家的法律。外交部正在根据需要,为杨俊伟提供适当的领事援助。”…

传总理将禁国人离开所住区域 政府忙辟谣假消息

网络出现总理李显龙今晚将宣布新措施,禁止国人离开自身所居住的区域,致使政府必须透过Gov.sg辟谣。 政府透过Gov.sg的Whataspp简讯,向民众澄清上述传言乃假消息。 当局也敦促众人不要传播未经核实的消息,并指出有关总理的声明,应以总理官方社交媒体平台如脸书、推特和Telegram官方账号为准。

Delay at EWL due to train fault; 40 minutes additional travelling time expected

Singapore Mass Rapid Transit (SMRT) has announced that its East-West Line (EWL) is…

英籍男子发起鼓掌活动 邀民众一同向前线人员致谢

冠状病毒19持续蔓延全球,在全球被疫情的乌云笼罩的当下,也正是需要正能量传播之际,英国籍男子Martin Vega受到英国#ClapforNHS启发,发起Clap For #SGUnited活动,呼吁所有居住在新加坡的人在周一(30日)晚上8点大声鼓掌,表示对前线工作者的感激和感谢。 目前旅居新加坡的英国籍男子Martin Vega表示,如今各国正在积极抗疫,但让他更自豪的是,狮城抗疫工作得到世举世认可。对于疫情透明度与每日的即时更新,都能让民众第一时间了解最新消息,彻底贯彻“与民抗疫”的成效。 然而,这些全赖于我国的第一线抗疫人员,包括医务人员、紧急服务人员、送货员、仓库员工、清洁工、超市工作人员以及为新加坡保持干净安全的人们。 受到英国近日发起的活动#ClapforNHS的激情启发,他表示,相信能够广邀新加坡人民一同参与活动,为日夜奋战的工作人员献上最真挚的感谢。 活动将于今日(30日)晚上8点,只要在你的窗户、门或者阳台上,大声鼓掌,为前线工作人员提振士气。 “想象一下,在新加坡,每个人站在窗前、阳台上,让响亮的掌声充斥着新加坡,向他们表达感谢,是多么生机勃勃的情况。” 目前已有3千877人响应,他也告诉著名生活杂志《Time Out》在新加坡发起活动的理由,“因为新加坡的社区意识总是让他吃惊”,因此他希望今晚医务人员也能体验到。…