internet-2.jpgBy Aaron Ng

Wednesday, 6 December, 2006

In reading Dhamendra Yadav and Bernard Leong’s thoughts on self-regulation by bloggers, I find myself agreeing with the principle of self-regulation.

The reason is simple enough. I don’t wish to see a blogger get into trouble over something posted on his/her blog out of ignorance. I don’t think that any blogger would intentionally seek trouble; the problem is more of a lack of knowledge of the environment governing communication.

Of course, why should bloggers self-regulate instead of leaving it up to the authorities? BL postulated blogger aversion to anything official as one reason. My perspective is that self-regulation may postpone an overly strict set of guidelines by official bodies that can restrict the relatively free space of expression enjoyed now by Singaporean bloggers.

The changes in the Penal Code might be a sign of things to come if things continue in their current trajectory. As the government begins to have greater experience with blogging, they will eventually figure out how best to control blogosphere. A self-regulating community may not prevent legislation, but it can help delay legislation or offer recommendations for any new legislation governing blogosphere such that it will not stifle the fledgling blogging community.

A blogging association

An association representing bloggers will cut more ice with authorities rather than individual bloggers voicing their opinions. This is a way of life everywhere, so it should not be a surprise. The question is whether such an association will have the support of the blogging community in general. For the association to work, it must be able to command enough support, or else it will just be a paper tiger.

I believe that such an association will actually command support if it can be a comprehensive source of information on blogging in Singapore, and that it actually can do some behind the scene negotiation if any member happen to transgress. Topics such as libel/defamation laws, copyright laws, ethics, good writing, nature of computer-mediated communication etc should be of considerable interest to most bloggers, whom I suspect are probably rather ignorant about all these right now. The closest website I’ve seen providing such information is on WWLegal but I think more can be done.

Bloggers should see the merits of an association

Ultimately, I hope that bloggers will come round to seeing the merit in having an association. To cut to the chase, its really for their own protection. In Singapore, our constitution gurantees freedom of expression but with restrictions. If we do not pre-empt the officials, it’s only a matter of time before the restrictions come in, which may very well kill the Singaporean blogging community. And, an association will raise the credibility of blogging. Members will be deemed ‘accredited’, and this will remove claims of blogs being unreliable by our government leaders. If bloggers can uphold a certain set of code of conduct, they can write with greater confidence and their words be taken with greater credibility.

Of course, as BL rightly pointed out, when people get together, there is bound to be politicking. However, should this even deter the formation of an association, given the benefits of having one? Singaporeans from all walks of life are blogging, and we can harness the collective expertise of this group, such as lawyers, academics, PR practitioners, writers etc to take the Singapore blogosphere to another level. Even if one does not wish for his/her blog to be a credible alternative to mainstream media, being a member of the association signifies that the content can be read with confidence because it is written in accordance with a set of guidelines.

On whether blogosphere is ready for such an association, I think that is a pointless debate. Maybe it’s just my perception, but I think that people will never agree on whether blogosphere is ready for such an association. I would just say that some bloggers should just get the ball rolling and see how things go from there. I’m willing to give this a shot. Anyone else willing to join?

———————

About the author

Aaron is 24 year-old final-year undergraduate in Communications and New Media at Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, National University of Singapore. His interests include blogging, web design, assembling and setting up computers, watching Japanese animation, soccer and playing Dota on Blizzard’s battlenet server.

Visit Aaron’s blog here.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Migrant workers at Blue Stars Dormitory express appreciation after three days of swab test

Last Saturday (16 May), migrant workers at Blue Stars Dormitory expressed their…

是什么样的领导,会选择抗疫时刻暗示要大选?

原文:维权律师张素兰 在看了本周日(15日),国家发展部长黄循财在记者会上的讲话,以及外交部长维文本月11日接受CNBC电视台的访谈,我感到很愤怒— 但不是生气这些部长,而是总理。 选区范围检讨委会上周出炉后,我国总理李显龙就在隔日(14日)在脸书发文写道: “我们有两种选择,要么期望疫情能在本届政府任期结束前就稳定下来。如此我们得以在正常情况下举行选举– 但对此我们无法确定。 又或者我们提早召开选举,既然知道我们将进入飓风,那么选出全新获委托和任期的新政府,可以与国人携手应对当前严峻事务… …。” 总理干嘛在这时暗示选举呢? 看看黄循财和维文,已经为了防堵疫情劳心劳力。 那些仍滞留国外重灾区、需要带回家的国人,他们要为他们的安全着想;他们担忧疫情对经济的冲击,想法设法减少对商业和国人生活的冲击。他们要顾虑我们的医疗系统是否能应付增长的病例、考量是否要关闭学府等,他们也落实边境管制。 看看他们疲惫和焦虑的脸吧。当记者询及总理要挟将提早举行大选时,维文和黄循财都避开了这问题。黄循财说当前他无暇去想选举的事,“选举并非当务之急。”他们都在应对一场全球疫情,也决意要防堵之。…

Charity begins at H.O.M.E

Bought too much Chinese New Years goodies and not knowing what to…

NUS conducts intensive investigation due to complaints about inappropriate orientation activities

The National University of Singapore (NUS) released a statement on 26 July…