critic.JPGBy Ney Reed

Sunday, 10 December, 2006

criticism (noun) – serious examination and judgment of something; disapproval expressed by pointing out faults or shortcomings.

critic(noun) – anyone who expresses a reasoned judgment of something; a person who offers a value judgement or an interpretation.

critique(noun) – a serious appraisal; a serious review.

opposition(noun) – resistance; the action of opposing something that you disapprove or disagree with;confrontation where the act of hostile groups opposing each other; a body of people united in opposing something; a contestant that you are matched against;

After writing two pieces of articles on my blog a year ago, i realized then that i am no longer living in north america but singapore where it is a common and prevalent phenomenon to see people equating criticism to opposition. Hence i wrote a blog piece subsequently ( here ) to explain that i am merely criticising and not opposing and that there is a distinct world of a difference between the two which the average singaporean from the politician to the average joe tend to miss. After writing two articles for online citizen, again i had the same vibes and here i am writing again to evaluate if and when criticism amounts to opposition.

Professor Seyyed Naquib Al-Attas, a scholar based in Malaysia, reknowned in the West for his contribution to Islamic Philosophy, once profoundly summarized one of the greatest dilemmas of mankind during a seminar in singapore by saying that “one cannot build an understanding in something in which he has uncertainties… he has to remove those uncertainties and thereafter only will he be able to build an understanding”. Indeed that understanding becomes the foundation upon which a value, thought, conclusion,system,organization,policy, intervention or initiative is constructed or implemented or pursued. Therefore when one has uncertainties in something, he/she will not be able to adequately/comprehensively understand it such that whatever he/she embark on using that inconsistent understanding, it is bound to produce less than optimal outcomes.

The definitions of criticism, critic and critique

Today in Singapore each one of us have built our own systems and universes where we have zero tolerance for criticism and instead equate it to opposition. Least do we sincerely ask ourselves whether criticism equates and amounts to opposition and if so, is it in exceptional cases or general cases.

The definitions of criticism, critic and critique above, which can be found in any of your english dictionaries, clearly indicate no resemblance in meaning to the definition of opposition. When one criticise or critique something or be a critic of something, he is in no way oppossing it. When one is opposing something, he/she can either criticise it or not but in most cases, it is the former. You may perhaps deduce criticism from opposition but never the other way round. It will be foolish, ignorant and naive to do that.

Let me illustrate with a few examples. The biggest, loudest and worst criticisms one can expect to hear about English league football clubs are not from their opponents but their own fans. The criticisms from these fans are not in any way criticisms but passionate disapprovals. The fans still splurge mindlessly on these clubs despite their criticisms and they never oppose them.

The worst critics of us in our lives are our parents, wives, husbands, teachers etc. In no way can we reasonably equate their criticisms to opposition. It is the very fact that they take our interests and well-being too seriously that they are charitable with their criticisms. What do we call a teenager who retaliates against his parents because they criticise him? Immature, spoilt, foolish. However that is precisely how we are living our lives here in Singapore happily equating every criticism to opposition.

In these two examples we see how criticisms can arise out of fondness, love, liking and that has no relation to an attitude of opposition or resistance.

Being human

One of the definition given above for criticism is that it is an act of disapproval. When do we disapprove? When we do not agree. Because each one of us have our individual mind, it is practically and realistically impossible to expect any two person to agree on everything or anything. They may or they may not. Hence criticisms in other cases can arise out of the very nature of us humans having born with an individual mind. We also disapprove because we may dislike it. There we see criticisms arising in some instances simply because of our very human nature of being born with emotions. Unless we remove the mind and emotions in us, we cannot stop criticisms. Furthermore disapproval does not equate to opposition. One can disapprove and yet not resist. There are so many things in our daily lives that we disapprove and we do not resist them.

Man, as we all know, is imperfect. But what we fail to realize is that because of this we need to understand that whatever man constructs or does is subject to imperfections. Therefore when one sees an imperfection or what seems to him/her as an imperfection, he/she will only naturally criticise. But doing that does not translate to opposing or resisting it which is something totally different. Furthermore it is only healthy for every man made construct to be subject to criticisms or else you can never reduce its imperfections. As long as its imperfections are not reduced, it will be unstable and likely to fail or self-destruct.

Criticisms are like feedback

Criticisms also do not lead necessarily to opposition. Criticisms are like feedback. When criticisms are accepted within a system, those criticisms will die out subsequently and only a fresh set of criticisms will arise.For instance should criticisms be as a result of assymetric information then information will be consistently exchanged and misunderstandings or inconsistent understandings will be clarrified. In other cases a compromise may be reached or there may be a reversal or a new solution implemented.

Opposition or resistance only arises from criticisms when criticisms are rejected and not tolerated or when criticisms are expected to be rejected and not tolerated. The human mind and emotions primarily propels the will within onself to oppose or resist. Hence the human mind and emotions cannot be held down forcibly by being intolerant to criticisms which really is a mere expression of the human mind and emotions.

As mentioned earlier no man made system can be stable or grow without a constant and continued effort to reduce the inherent and ever present imperfections. However this can only happen through tolerance for criticisms. What can perhaps can additionally be pursued is to educate how to express a criticism with a sense of discipline in the mind, soul and body because the receiving end of the criticism also has a mind and emotions such that his/her sensitivities must not be injured.

Every successful civilization thrived only through its continous strive to reduce its inherent imperfections and every successful society/civilization that fell was due to it being oblivious to its imperfections. The imporant avenue and mechanism to identify and rectify imperfections within a system is definitely through criticisms. The divine tests us with our weakness and never with our strengths and if we shut our eyes to weakness, that is when we really fall and break.


About the author

Ney Reed, aged 29, a Singaporean, economist by training, considers himself a conceptual analyst, had been an active participant in public-interests & social-interests dialogue groups, anti-globalization movements and Palestinian human rights lobby in North America during his five years’ stay there.

Visit Ney’s blog here.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

轿车鲁莽换车道 送餐员疑被撞倒路上

  银色轿车鲁莽换车道,没顾及后方的其他道路使用者,结果一辆尾随在后骑电单车送餐员,连人带车倒在路上。 但令网民愤怒的是,轿车竟无视事故发生,继续行驶离开,让人看了都不禁问到,“有没有搞错?!”。 一段誌期9月13日、行车记录器所拍摄到的车祸经过短片在脸书流传,根据脸书群组SG Road Vigilante,有关意外发生在中央快速公路的一条分支路前。 网民纷纷炮轰“难以接受这样的驾驶方式”,指责银色轿车的驾驶者不应该连续越过两条车道、转回原来车道时,也应该让路给原路上道路使用者。 然而有些网民认为银色轿车并没有真正撞到电单车送餐员,是送餐员因闪避时紧急刹车而导致电单车打滑。 (短片源自脸书群组SG Road Vigilante)

【冠状病毒19】9月15日确诊病例增34起 六入境病例

卫生部指出,截至今日(9月15日)中午12时,我国新增的冠状病毒19确诊病例多达34起,包括六起入境病例,没有本地社区病例。 加上今日的新增病例,我国确诊病例已累计到5万7488起。 六起入境病例在抵达我国后,已经开始履行居家通知了。

连氏基金长期护理研究报告(3)–仅4巴仙业者受规范 报告吁正规化居家看护业

连氏基金会针对长期护理前景的报告也提到,私人看护业发展蓬勃,当前至少有60私人业者提供看护服务,而其中55家皆是居家看护。然而,只有两家获得政府补助金,并需遵守卫生部条规。 “医生、护士和物理治疗师都受规范,但是往往专业失当的惩处只针对个人例如犯错雇员,背后的业者却不受对付。业者可以更换掉倒霉的员工,之后依然我行我素。” 对此,研究学者Shirlena Huang要求,在有更多私人业者涉足居家看护的情况下,社区导向的乐龄看护应受规范,特别是年长者属弱势群体,需保障他们的权益。 “有效的执法框架应包括三点:立法、监督看护素质以及设立投诉管道。”Shirlena Huang提出,除了现有立法机构,也让独立监督团体负责监督护理的品质,以及处理相关的投诉。此外,对看护业者设立表现评级,让国人知情和作出明智选择,也促使业者竞争提升优质服务。 在2015年,透过咨询相关领域,卫生部推出服务指南作为居家看护业者的参考,这些指南涵盖四领域:1)整体看护服务的提供2)安全与品质3)护理业尊严、知情和有利的看护4)卓越组织性和可持续的看护 不过,这些指南非务必遵守,没有获得津贴的居家服务业者可能依循自己的标准,例如对于看护人员的审核就很容易出问题。 作为新加坡成长迅速的居家看护业者,Homage首席执行员暨创办人Gillian Tee认同不论慈善团体或私人业者,都应受到规范,以期年长者和残障群体都能享有更好的居家看护服务。 冀提升看护人员待遇 另一方面,在连氏基金会上月的另一份研究,则提到相比韩国、日本、香港和澳洲,我国乐龄看护人员酬劳最低。比起医院,长期看护领域雇员在职期更低。…

狮城男在越南面对死刑 拉维愿无偿助上诉

8月7日,越南媒体报导,越南西宁省法庭审理新加坡籍被告人佘伟汉(Cher Wei Hon译音) 非法贩运毒品一案。庭审结束后,法院判决佘伟汉死刑。 当时新加坡外交部表示,已获悉上述案件,并联系佘伟汉家属,新加坡驻胡志明市总领事,已为后者提供领事协助。 在越南,走私600公斤以上海洛因或2.5公斤以上冰毒,就会被判死刑;制造或交易100克海洛因或300克其他非法毒品亦同。 本地人权律师拉维(M Ravi)则在本周一表示,佘伟汉家属已联系他,他决定无偿受理佘伟汉案件,因后者家仍有老小,他患病的母亲负责照顾他的三名子女。 拉维称,据佘伟汉家属反映,目前他在上诉过程未有律师能提供他建议,甚至也不确定审讯时有无律师辩护。 他表示,已联系在越南的人权律师,希望能尽快深入了结此案。 除了佘伟汉,早前拉维也关注,在中国卷入运毒案的狮城女子妹阿兹琳达(Siti Aslinda)。她被判枪决死刑。对此拉维也致函外交部询问进一步资讯。…