(L to R) Liang Eng Hwa, Sharael Taha and Tin Peiling, PAP MPs who spoke on fiscal management

The debate on the Singapore Budget 2023 on Wednesday (22 Feb) seems to be centred around the balance between spending and prudence.

Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Lawrence Wong has announced that the government is expecting a deficit of $2 billion for the 2022 financial year and a deficit of S$0.4 billion for the 2023 financial year.

While some Members of Parliament have called for increased spending to help Singaporeans, especially in light of the escalating cost of living, some from the People’s Action Party (PAP) have expressed concerns about the country’s fiscal room in the future.

But don’t the PAP MPs seem to be missing “the elephant in the room”?

It should be noted that S$19.58 billion of Special Transfers, including Top-ups to Endowment and Trust Funds, are being charged off as one year’s expenditure when they are meant to fund spending for many years into the future.

For example, the Pioneer Generation Fund and Merdeka Generation Fund were charged at S$8 billion in 2015 and S$6.1 billion in 2019 as one year’s expenditure, but as of March 2022, only a portion of these funds has been disbursed.

According to a parliamentary reply in October 2022, as of March 31, 2022, the Pioneer Generation Fund has disbursed only S$3.04 billion, with a fund balance of S$6.16 billion. The Merdeka Generation Fund has disbursed only S$0.72 billion, with a fund balance of S$5.72 billion.

This practice of charging future spending as a one-time expense does not align with the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) fiscal reporting guidelines.

Moreover, the $16.82 billion of Top-ups to Endowment and Trust Funds represents a significant increase of 169.1% compared to the previous year.

Subscribe
Notify of
9 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Power concedes nothing without demand

by Remy Choo Zhengxi ST Editor-at-Large, Han Fook Kwang, writes (from behind…

A reality check on Lawrence Wong’s claims: Are today’s HDB flats as affordable as those in the 1980s and 1990s?

Deputy Prime Minister Lawrence Wong’s assertion that today’s HDB flats remain as affordable as those in the past seems challenged by historical data and price-to-income ratio analysis. With incomes increasing only about 3.3 times against a 5.8-fold rise in BTO prices, are public housing truly in tandem with incomes as claimed?

Only time will tell if the POFMA will dumb down sentiment

Not too long ago, opposition parties, the alternative media outlets and political…