Thailand should respect, protect, and fulfil the right of its people to peaceful assembly and expression, and must immediately end the use of disproportionate and unnecessary force against protesters, said Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA) and Human Rights Lawyers Alliance (HRLA) in a joint statement on Monday (30 Aug).
In the past month, Thai authorities have increased the systemic use of violence against protesters to clamp down on pro-democracy activists since the beginning of the year. Authorities have targeted not only protesters, but also journalists wearing visible armbands and bystanders at protest sites.
“The use of excessive force against protesters is unjustifiable under international human rights law. The police have an obligation to respect the people’s right to express themselves, including through ensuring their security,” said FORUM-ASIA.
“While several protesters have allegedly engaged in acts such as throwing rocks and using fireworks, the vast majority of the protesters were peaceful, thus, police actions cannot justify the wide-scale brutality and violence as they are obliged to protect individuals and facilitate peaceful assemblies.”
In August 2021, police fired rubber bullets at protesters at close or elevated range — even at protesters who did not pose a threat — and indiscriminately used tear gas and water cannons.
Protester Tanat ‘Nat’ Thanakitamnuay is confirmed to have been blinded in one eye after being hit by a tear gas canister. A 15-year-old boy was shot with live ammunition allegedly by the police, and is left in critical condition.
Violence occurred amidst continuing arrests of protesters and pro-democratic leaders
Earlier this year, the pro-democracy movement regained momentum after Thailand’s second wave of COVID-19, calling for the same main demands as last year — the resignation of Prime Minister General Prayut Chan-O-Cha, amendments to the Thai constitution, and monarchy reform.
As the country once again grappled with a surge of COVID-19 cases toward the middle of 2021, protesters in Bangkok and other provinces began demanding the resignation of Prime Minister General Prayut Chan-O-Cha over his mishandling of the COVID-19 situation, in addition to their main demands last year.
Protesters have employed various means to voice their demands, including through ‘car mob’ rallies by cruising around Bangkok in cars and motorcycles, or holding simultaneous gatherings.
The violence has occurred amidst the continuing arrests of protesters and pro-democratic leaders. An estimated 242 have been arrested for their participation in pro-democratic demonstrations from 1 August to 23 August, of which at least 56 of which are minors.
Police officers have conducted these arrests often without warrants. The arrested are accused of violations of the Emergency Decree, the Penal Code, and various other offences.
“These arrests are often conducted without warrants, and protesters are detained in centers outside of their jurisdiction and far away from the city, where they face difficulties accessing lawyers and are denied fair trial as enshrined under the Criminal Procedure Code,” said HRLA.
“It also highlights the authorities’ continuous intimidation of protesters, with the aim to crack down on the pro-democracy movement and send a chilling message to all that they will face reprisal.”
Thailand is a State Party under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) which obliges it to respect fundamental freedoms, including the right to expression and peaceful assembly. Any restrictions to these rights must abide by the principles of legality, necessity, proportionality, precaution, and non-discrimination.
“We reiterate our call to the Thai government to respect its obligations under international law and end its use of disproportionate force against protesters. They must unconditionally drop all charges and immediately release the detained protesters,” said FORUM-ASIA and HRLA.
“The government has consistently used indiscriminate force to crack down on the pro-democracy movement. They must realise that the ideals of democracy live on a wide range of differing opinions including critical voices, government-opposing opinions and sentiments of younger generations, which cannot be stifled.”