Lt. Gen. Neo Kian Hong in 2012. (Photo by United States Department of Defense )

In an interview with the media, new man at the helm of SMRT, former army man Neo Kian Hong (Neo), announced that SMRT will be reorganised even though he declined confirming a fixed timeline for this planned reorganisation. A corporation would not normally go through a reorganisation unless there is either a cost cutting exercise or if the current organisation is not up to scratch.

Assuming that SMRT is not undergoing a cost cutting exercise and taking into consideration the recent woes faced by SMRT in the form of delays, accidents and even deaths, it is reasonable to come to the conclusion that the reorganisation is taking place because the current organisation is not up to standard. How then does this gel with Neo’s declaration that there are no deep-seated cultural issues within SMRT?

Looking at the spate of issues faced by SMRT and the amount of criticism leveled at it in recent years, I find it hard to believe that there are no seated issues. Besides, why would its previous CEO, Desmond Kuek, risk his reputation by saying there are issues if it weren’t true? Most obviously, why is there a reorganisation if there weren’t deep seated issues? Reorganisations are time consuming and troublesome. An entity the size of SMRT would not enter into this decision lightly. Most likely, this would only be done because it had to be done. This begs the question – why is Neo saying that there are no issues when there appear to be rather significant ones?

Don’t get me wrong. I am heartened that change may finally be enforced in an organisation that so many have criticised. However, why pretend there are no issues when there clearly are? Is Neo trying to downplay the problems so that he can reassure the public? If this is in the case, the proof is in the pudding. Let’s see how the proposed changes improve things. The public will judge by the results and not what Neo says. Besides, if things do not improve, Neo runs the risk of appearing to lie to the public with his premature proclamation that there are no deep-seated issues.

At the end of the day, your actions must be consistent with your words. If they are inconsistent, public trust gets eroded even further. SMRT is an organisation where public trust is already at an all time low. It would be better if Neo just focused on what he is doing to improve things and avoid making sweeping statements too early.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Jack Sim: COVID-19 offers the opportunity for locals to get hired in the construction industry

Since the explosion of COVID-19 cases in migrant workers’ dormitories, their existence…

S$133k damages for sharing an article link on Facebook: Why is no one talking about proportionality?

The verdict is out on Leong Sze Hian. On Wednesday (24 Mar), the…

Why did the Ministers get their wives to sign the tenancy agreements for Ridout Road properties?

Opinion: Despite clearing Ministers K Shanmugam and Vivian Balakrishnan of corruption, questions remain: Why were their wives, who seemingly do not meet the necessary financial criteria, permitted to rent state properties at Ridout Road? According to the Singapore Land Authority (SLA) bidding form, an individual bidder should have an average monthly income at least three times the bid rent. In this instance, Mrs Shanmugam and Mrs Balakrishnan would need to earn $79,500 and $57,000 per month, respectively, to qualify as bidders under these criteria. However, while it appears that both wives fall short of these income requirements, their husbands would meet the criteria. This discrepancy prompts the question: Why did the wives sign the tenancy agreements, and why didn’t the SLA ask the Ministers to be the ones officially listed as the bidders?

How one question and analyse when one is too busy trying to repress one’s personal truth?

At the recent launch of his book, “Asking Why”, Chairman of Singapore…