Image of a golden peanut from Shutterstock.com

I refer to the article “$700m SG Bonus to be paid out to 2.8m S’poreans by December” (Straits Times, Sep 29).

A total of 2.8 million Singaporeans will receive letters from 2 October 2018 onwards, informing them of their SG Bonus benefit, which will be paid out to citizens by December 2018.

The Ministry of Finance (MOF) announced on Friday, that citizens may use their SingPass to view their SG Bonus benefit online at the SG Bonus website, which will be accessible from 2 October 2018 onwards.

The ministry added that those who have registered their mobile numbers with SingPass will also receive SMS notifications.

As announced at Budget 2018, MOF said that the Government will be giving a one-off SG Bonus to all adult Singaporeans this year, which reflects the Government’s long-standing commitment to share the fruits of the country’s development with Singaporeans.

According to the ministry, eligible citizens will receive up to $300, depending on their Assessable Income (AI) for the Year of Assessment (YA) 2017.

Finance Minister Heng Swee Keat had said in this year’s Budget speech that the bonus comes with an expected overall Budget surplus of $9.6 billion, or 2.1 per cent of gross domestic product, for the 2017 financial year.

The surplus was markedly higher than the $1.9 billion forecast a year ago, mainly because of exceptional statutory board contributions of $4.6 billion. The SG Bonus will be given on top of the Goods and Services Tax Voucher scheme, and service and conservancy charges rebate for eligible Singaporeans.

On top of ‘the expected overall Budget surplus of $9.6 billion, or 2.1 per cent of gross domestic product, for the 2017 financial year’ – we make so much money from Singaporeans, from CPF, HDB, etc, that this $700 million may be like ‘peanuts’, whilst they take ‘a pound of flesh’ back from us.

For example, our CPF balances is $376.6 billion as of June 2018. If the difference between the weighted average interest annually on all CPF accounts and the annualised returns from inception of GIC is say 2% – the ‘pound of flesh’ that is being taken from us, may be about $7.53 billion ($376.6 x 2%) a year.

In this connection, the Government should disclose the statistics on the weighted average annual interest on all CPF accounts vis-a-vis the annualised returns in S$ of GIC, historically, in the public interest, and in line with the online falsehoods’ committee’s recommendation that the Government should give the reasons for decisions not to disclose information to the public, and to gain the public’s trust.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Nparks throws last minute notification on Protest Event against Reserved Presidential Election

Organisers and speakers of the protest event on this Saturday, have been sent…

Electrical prices and ministerial salaries-Two unrelated problems with the same rationale

Errors occur and mistakes happen – fair enough. That said, are blackouts…

NDP seating arrangement at The Float shows the pervasiveness of entitlement

I know I have already written articles aplenty in relation to the…

Don’t expect the PAP to change their playbook

In his recent opinion piece, Augustine Low criticizes the People’s Action Party (PAP) for sticking to their old playbook and failing to bring about change and reinvention. Despite all the talk of change, the PAP cannot bring itself to ditch the playbook that it has relied on for decades. Low argues that the PAP preys on insecurity, vulnerability, and division, and promulgates the idea that it is indispensable to a glorious one-party system. Low highlights Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s speech in which he outlined various “storms” that Singapore faces, calling it out of sorts messaging. PM Lee called on Singaporeans to stay united as one people, which really meant to unite as one behind the PAP. The Deputy Prime Minister Lawrence Wong stuck to the playbook as well, warning that the PAP might not win the next election and taking a potshot at the opposition. Low argues that those who still hope for change from the PAP are hoping in vain. The onus is on the people to change, and as long as they keep giving the PAP their parliamentary supermajority, the PAP sees no need to change. Low believes that it is time for the people to take responsibility and change the status quo.