Opinion
Nat-Geo magazine fully funded by MCI to promote the PAP’s version of Singapore?
According to reports, it would appear that the Ministry of Communications and Information (MCI) has paid National Geographic to create a special Singapore edition magazine in line with its #WhatMakesSG campaign. While it is being called a “collaboration” between MCI and National Geographic, the fact that the magazine is completely funded by MCI would indicate that it is less of a partnership and more of a “paid job”.
Is it not a little bit similar to a wedding photographer capturing the couple of their special day? While you may call it a collaboration, how it actually works is that you produce what the couple wants in return for a fee. Of course National Geographic is a far bigger operation than a wedding photographer. It is also far more global in its reach but if you drill now to basics, it sounds like they are being paid to produce a glossy advertorial campaign for the Singapore government. And why not if Singapore has a huge budget? Mariah Carey is not a wedding singer but she can be if she’s paid enough. Clearly, there’s a price for everything.
This begs the question, why is Singapore shelling out big bucks for National Geographic to produce the 250,000 copies “limited edition” magazine? The report also states that the magazines will be distributed across the island on 8 August which implies that the magazine is not for sale. Ostensibly, the magazine is to commemorate Singapore’s 53rd birthday. But if it were so, why aren’t more Singaporeans invited to take part? Apart from this report, there does not seem to be much information available in terms of the content or participants of this magazine outside the establishment. Is this a genuine commemoration of the country of Singapore or is it an attempt to promote the PAP’s version of Singapore?
The magazine interviews PM Lee on his views for Singapore’s future whilst highlighting the importance of teamwork and collaboration in Singapore’s transformation towards a city of the future. Just based on this report, it sounds like a vanity project on the part of the government to remind Singaporeans on how awesome they are and showcase PAP’s version of Singapore to National Geographic’s international fan base, however unwitting.
The fact that they have not reached out to advertisers also suggests that they would like to be in total control of the contents.
I can’t imagine that a project like this would be cheap. Why then are we doing it? Can MCI please disclose their reasoning for this and also the amount spent? It is public money after all.
-
Politics4 days ago
Desmond Tan criticised for “listening ear” remark in Straits Times podcast
-
Comments7 days ago
Ng Chee Meng faces backlash for perceived downplaying of Singaporeans’ job security concerns
-
Comments1 week ago
Netizens criticise K Shanmugam for sharing video on alleged Bukit Gombak harassment incident
-
Singapore1 week ago
SM Lee Hsien Loong defends CECA, calls for integration and openness amidst political sensitivities
-
Opinion2 weeks ago
Holes in Low Yen Ling’s allegations against PSP: No evidence provided from her volunteers
-
International1 week ago
New York Times examines Singapore’s Lee family feud over historic 38 Oxley Road
-
Politics2 weeks ago
Low Yen Ling accuses PSP of “twisting the truth” over alleged harassment in Choa Chu Kang GRC
-
Civil Society7 days ago
Students stage memorial at NUS to honour Palestinian victims and urge universities to cut Israeli ties