Uncategorized
An all-and-sundry legislation
The internet is rife with different opinions questioning the intent of the amendment. Is this really a step forward towards liberalisation or is this a step backwards to contain certain political parties? Even worse is this to introduce a catch-all clause to contain even the film producer, the videographer and free speech.
It shows off a government that is incapable of trusting its own citizens to watch political films.

- Opinion2 weeks ago
Shanmugam’s call to avoid politicising Nee Soon’s kickback case exposes hypocrisy given his 2015 attack on WP
- Singapore2 days ago
Is Shanmugam building a palace at Ridout Road?
- Comments5 days ago
Netizens demand accountability from Chee Hong Tat over 3 MRT breakdowns in a week
- Singapore1 week ago
Former transport minister S. Iswaran placed on home detention scheme after serving part of jail term
- Singapore2 weeks ago
Healthcare worker’s death sparks public dispute between TTSH and Red Dot United’s Ravi Philemon
- Politics2 weeks ago
Foreign family members of candidates exempted from election participation rule in Singapore
- Court Cases1 week ago
Ong Beng Seng diagnosed with bone marrow cancer amid ongoing charges linked to ex-minister S Iswaran
- Parliament1 week ago
Indranee Rajah backtracks on claim divorcing applicants face no HDB rental hurdles