By Leong Sze Hian

This Channelnewsasia report titled “Enough places in local universities for Singaporeans : MOE”, quotes Mr Gan Kim Yong, Minister of State for Education as saying:

“The universities do give priority to local students. And for our students who can qualify based on the requirement of each discipline and each faculty would have been given admission. Beyond that, the universities would want to ensure there are also sufficient foreign students to provide diversity.”

“Mr Gan said 28,000 Singapore students applied to the universities this year and half of them were offered places. In contrast, 23,000 foreign students applied and only 987 or 4.3 percent were given places”.

In this connection, I refer to the articles “More varsity places needed, says Tony Tan” (ST, Jun 19) and “Skewed demand led to squeeze on varsity places: Shortage only for popular courses, and isn’t due to Dragon Year effect” (ST, Jun 16), and the Ministry of Education’s reply “S’poreans have priority in university admission” (ST, Jun 16) to 3 letters in ST forum.

Although an additional 1,270 or 10% more places were provided this year, was the foreign intake still 20%? If so, the 10% increase was not just for Singaporeans, but for foreigners too.

The 20% foreigner cap is for the first year intake only. According to a report in the Business Times of 26 May,

“international students now make up about 20% of NTU’s undergraduate population and about 33% of its graduate population…the National University of Singapore (NUS) said about 20% of its 23,900 undergraduates and about 50% of its 9,100 postgraduate students are from overseas…the number of permanent residencies (PRs) awarded last year rose to 57,300 – a 9.6% increase from 2005 and a 55.3% increase from 2004”.


This means that about 28% of the total student population in NUS are foreigners. If we factor in PRs, the number of students in NUS who are Singaporeans may be around 60%.

Since only 4.3% of foreigners were given places compared to 50% for Singapore students this year, how do we explain the above NUS statement that “about 20% of its 23,900 undergraduates and about 50% of its 9,100 postgraduate students are from overseas”?

For how many years has this “20% foreigners” policy been in practice?

What is the actual admission intake figures for Singaporeans, PRs and foreigners, which may be different from “places offered”?

Does “places offered” to foreign students, include those who are on scholarships?

What is the impact of our foreign students policy on Singaporeans’ ability to secure places in popular university courses?

How many Singaporeans have no choice but to go overseas or enrol in local or foreign tertiary institutions in Singapore?

I would like to suggest that the intake of foreigners should be kept at 20% per course, so that more vacancies in less popular courses may be offered as alternatives to Singaporeans.

For more of Sze Hian’s writings, please visit his website here.


Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Stop nannying Malay-Muslims and discard old suspicions

Govt should move beyond tokenism. Abdul Gafoor.

GIC losses – foreign media more important than Parliament?

Why did the govt reveal losses to foreign media but not Parliament?

CASE’s relationship with NTUC

CASE and NTUC – close relationship and a question of impartiality.

Letter to PM Lee to honour Mr JBJ

Group seeks signatures in support for JBJ honour call.