Jolovan Wham at the public forum which featured Joshua Wong as one of the speakers, through skype

The Community Action Network and Demosisto have released a joint statement criticising the prosecution ofJolovan Wham, a social worker and activist, for holding a Skype discussion which the police have deemed an ‘illegal public assembly’.

Five members of the Community Action Network along with the Secretary-General of Demosisto, Joshua Wong endorsed the statement which says the prosecuting a citizen for a Skype conversation that took place within the confines of a private space only enforces the perception that the Singapore government does not respect the fundamental rights of their citizens.

The strong statement echoes the sentiment of the international community over the absurdity of the law that seems to go against common sense where a person can be detained and prosecuted for something he does in his own space just because the government does not like what he has to say.

The International Commission of Justice has called for Singapore to amend the Public Order Act, under which Mr Wham is being charged, to ensure that it is consistent with international human rights law and standard.

Read the Joint Statement by The Community Action Network and Demosisto here:

Prosecuted for holding a Skype discussion: Singapore Should Respect the Right to Freedom of Assembly 

Singaporean social worker and activist Jolovan Wham will be back in court on October 1, 2018. This time, he’s being tried for organising a Skype discussion with Joshua Wong, a prominent leader of Hong Kong’s Umbrella Movement. 

Police are describing the closed-door talk which took place in November 2016, as an “illegal public assembly”. Authorities say they contacted Wham prior to the event to tell him to apply for a permit. Wham did not have enough time to do so, and now faces a fine of up to S$5,000 if he is found guilty. 

Whether or not Wham broke the law is a matter for the judges to decide. But commonsense says police should not have been involved and prosecutors should not have charged him to begin with. Skype conversations that take place within the confines of a private space are private matters that should logically, not require permits before they can be carried out. 

Freedom of assembly is a fundamental human right. But in Singapore, attempts by citizens to come together for a shared cause are often viewed with suspicion by the government. Protests are only allowed to be held in one location. A single person can constitute an “illegal assembly”. Such restrictive rules have given authorities plenty of leeway to prosecute activists like Wham, but virtually anyone can be a target.

Citizens of a first-world nation should not have to worry about whether or not an indoor event constitutes an “illegal assembly”, or whether or not police permission is required before a Skype conversation can even proceed. Such exchanges are normal in any healthy society. Wham’s discussion with Wong ended peacefully and would not have drawn any further attention if authorities hadn’t decided to act. 

Wham is also being prosecuted for refusing to sign his police statement. Wham says he declined because he was not allowed to have copies of the statement. It is puzzling why an accused person should be denied access to such an important document. The policy should be amended. 

Wham faces a further two charges for organising “illegal assemblies”. He’s also been charged with “vandalism”, for using scotch-tape to stick two pieces of paper on a train, and another two charges for not signing police statements. If found guilty of these offences, he faces a fine of up to S$5,000 or a jail term of up to three years. 

By prosecuting Wham for his involvement in peaceful, non-violent protests and related activities, the Singapore government has only reinforced the perception that it does not respect fundamental rights taken for granted by citizens in other first-world democracies. This is deeply regrettable. Public resources and taxpayers’ money can be put to far better use. This kind of gross over-reaction only serves to reflect the state’s paranoia and inability to trust its own people.

Endorsed by: Joshua Wong, Secretary-General, Demosisto, and the following members of Community Action Network, Singapore: Lynn Lee, Roy Ngerng, Shelley Thio, Vincent Wijeysingha, Rachel Zeng.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

7月也不行! 防备疫情复发民主党重申勿仓促选举

早前,有专家分析我国执政政府或会配合解封的第二阶段,将大选定在6月底至7月初举行。 5月28日,副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰也在访谈中声称选举临近,需要做好准备。但对此工人党也质问,应尽早公布具体在疫情下如何进行竞选的细节和详情。 对于盛传7月选举的揣测,民主党在今日(3日)发文告,认为我国刚结束近两个月的阻断措施,政府都还在摸索如何应对当前社会和经济局势。 在当前局势不明朗、冠状病毒19疫情后遗症还在持续的情况下,若7月举行选举,无疑将威胁国人的安全和健康。 即便贸工部长陈振声早前也坦言,选举局无法过早公布来届选举规则,理由是规则都可能会因疫情局势而需要调整转变。 民主党重申勿仓促举行选举,部长和政府机构理应集中精神和资源,防备疫情如同其他国家那般,出现复发现象。 该党敦促执政党不要重蹈覆辙,犯上三月份的疏失,因转移视线备战竞选,结果导致疫情大爆发。该党也认为,理应在疫情确实受控的情况下才状况选举,且各国已积极采取措施,相信冠病疫情终将能克服。 该党强调,选举既然不需要等到2021年4月才召开,但也可在今年底才进行。不过前提是人民行动党政府把群众健康摆在首位。

Singapore Literature Prize judges resign over NLB's book removal

By Howard Lee A number of judges for the Singapore Literature Prize…

AWARE calls for careful matching of tenants in HDB’s Single Room Shared Facility Scheme

Singaporean women’s rights group AWARE has expressed concerns over the Single Room Shared Facility Scheme pilot project launched by the Housing & Development Board (HDB), which offers privacy of one’s own room but communal facilities. AWARE suggests tenants be matched sensitively to minimise conflicts, noting its previous experience running a single-mother family project. It also recommends the government repurpose the scheme for vulnerable single women who face violence and lack means to rent on the open market.

HDB prices hit record high

Sales of HDB resale flats also surge.