By Terry Xu

chopefood
Screen grab of the CHOPE FOOD for the NEEDY fanpage

The story which inspired the suspended coffee movement started off in a travel blog, Accidental Tourist , the suspended coffee movement has gained popularity after a reemergence from sharing of the story via social media. This suspended coffee movement has made its way to Singapore in another form. A page named “CHOPE FOOD for the NEEDY – ‘Suspended Food Revolution’ to Pay It Forward” has localized this concept into a suspended food movement, to pay for food that stall owners can give to the needy based on their discretion.

In various interviews with the mainstream media, the page owner is revealed to be a Singaporean named Michelle Tan, who said that instead of paying $5 dollars for a latte, you pay for food that the hawker can give to the needy.

Despite just having started off two days ago on Tuesday, it has its fans swelled up to well over four thousands and still on the march to grow even larger.

In the posting at the fanpage, it explains how to go about joining in the movement.

Go to your favourite hawker & other like-minded, kind hawkers to PRE-PAY for eg. 1, 5 or 10 packets of food. Ask them to give this food out to needy folk whenever they see them.

Sounds simple? Yes it probably is, but the first step to approach hawkers for pre-pay food seems pretty awkward for some interested individuals. Which is why the page has come up with an explanatory post for the uninitiated.

chopefood

Referring to the suggestions that stickers could be given so as to identify which are the participating stalls for the needy, Michelle explains that this is something which the movement seek to avoid.

“We have asked the hawker to make the judgement call as to who he will give out the food to. For this to work, he must do it under the radar. No one should be coming to him specifically. “

Because in the worst scenario of this movement, there will be people who make use of the goodwill and badgered the hawker for free food. Depriving those who are really in need of the food paid by others out of good will.

“The beauty of this system is there is in effect no need to get awareness out to the needy. We are harnessing the supply side of things, not the demand side – We are delegating the part of finding needy people to the hawkers who will have an idea of who’s needy in their area.” Said Michelle in one of the posting.

Some have also been cynical over the movement expressing that this is a scheme that would benefit hawkers from the advance payment. But as the owner of the page states, people joining in the movement should not pre-pay food to hawkers whom the person do not trust.

True enough that such a goodwill movement acts on good faith. Whether or not such a movement would gain further momentum or sizzle into thin air would depend on the joint actions of the three parties, the payer, the hawker and those who receive the food. Though there are bound to be people who seek to abuse good will but here is hoping that such an initiative can grow to a movement which every Singaporean can be proud of.

[spacer style=”1″ icon=”none”]

Michelle Tan in her own words,

How should I broach this with the hawker?

Sample conversation:
Hi, Uncle. Can I order food in advance?
(Hand over the cash.)
My friends and I have decided to go to our favourite food-stalls and order food. Then if you see any poor people …those who cannot afford a proper meal … in the market or anywhere… you can give the food to them.
It is called “CHOPE FOOD for the Needy”.

(Go back the next week to see how things went. Repeat.)

Some people seem hesitant, worrying that it is hard to explain the concept to the hawkers. Don’t worry. It’s easy. They get it. The hawkers are close to the ground. They are in the area day in, day out and many have been there for decades. My bet is that all of them could reel off the names of 5 needy people from the area the moment you asked them to.

How will the needy know which stalls to approach?

The needy are not intended to approach any stalls – the hawkers are meant to make the judgment call on who are the needy and go forward to offer the meals to them. We are harnessing the supply side of things, not the demand side of things.

Database of stalls / Identifying Stickers – yea or nay

While there have been many calls for a database of, & stickers on, ‘participating stores’, I fear that this could lead to the stalls being badgered for free meals (whether by deserving folk or not-so-genuine people).
Stickers are a no-no. This is a “by the people for the people”, “it takes a village” initiative. It would detract from the simplicity and low-cost ‘kampung’ community spirit of the movement to institutionalise it. My gut-feel is that people are inspired by this movement precisely because it is in their hands – they get to task a hawker of their choice (someone they are comfortable with) to carry out the good deed.

Doubters/Haters

Cynical comments have popped up, as one might expect, asking “How do you know for sure that the hawkers will follow through?” “They might find that this is a way to just line their own pockets.” “Too naive to believe that everyone is trustworthy”.

** This movement hinges on the belief that there are good people out there.

Personally, if someone gave me $10 to give out packets of my food to feed poor old ladies, I would never pocket the money. My bet is that 99% or even 100% of the hawkers would not pocket the money either. **

At the end of the day, it is sad & a bit demoralising to see the haters’ comments – they have such a jaundiced view of the world, and I worry that they will colour the view of the many kind-hearted & optimistic people who have joined in. So, I say, “Cynics begone from this page. This movement is based on good faith, trust & a belief in the good in others. Cynics trying to tear the movement down have no place here.”

Ultimately, my view is this: If what I do allows even ONE person to be fed, who would otherwise have gone hungry, then it has been worth it.

Singapore

Singaporeans are always given such a hard time for being ‘selfish’, ‘robotic’ and ‘heartless’. I find that there is a lot of kindness in people all around us in Singapore. Singaporeans look very standoffish but when you need help, strangers will usually come to your aid.
** I think that people in Singapore are actually very kind, they just don’t often get the chance to show it. This gives them that chance. **

Why start this?

Who hasn’t ever been down and out and needed help of some kind? When I was down and out, I was grateful to be able to rely on the help of my aunts, mum & brother. Everyone can do with a helping hand every now and then. This way, we help people who have no one else to help them.

My parents are some of the most generous people I know. Growing up with their example, helping strangers or the needy just becomes a natural thing to do.

**This movement would fulfil a basic human need for food, and I think it is wonderful to be able to feed someone a good meal; who cares if you never meet the person and you never get any thanks for it. That’s what Paying It Forward is all about. Hoping that the good deeds you do without any return, will inspire others to do wonderful things too. **

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【冠状病毒19】5月19日新增451例确诊

根据卫生部文告,截至5月19日中午12时,本地新增451例冠状病毒19确诊病例,累计总病例达为2万8794例。 卫生部称,新确诊病例大多数是住宿舍工作准证持有者。一名新增病患为新加坡人或永久居民。 当局仍在搜集病例详情,并将在晚些时候公布。

Budget 2012: Pragmatic in the face of a downturn

~by: Simeon Ang~ Pragmatism, an attribute that our government is known to…

New usage-based insurance launched for GrabCar drivers

A motor insurance policy, whereby private car for hire drivers will be…

“良才皆入在野党” 林鼎祝贺李显扬加入前进党

人民之声党领袖林鼎律师,在昨日的直播中谈及新加坡的多个问题如新印经济合作协议(CECA)、政府实现CECA的目标、以及新加坡的薪酬水平问题。 直播开始时,他先向近日加入前进党的已故总理李光耀次子李显扬表示祝贺,他表示,这对于在野党而言无疑是个好消息,也成为在野党前进的动力。 “这表明,在野党正获得真正有才华的人才,当然我们也知道李显扬何许人也,事实上,他愿意在如今的政治舞台上站定立场,并和亲哥哥所领导的人民行动党对抗,这无疑将在此次的选举中造成轰动。” 林鼎:若人民之声成执政政府,将废除CECA 接下來,有观众提问有关新印经济合作协议(CECA)的立场,他解释为何会称新印经济合作协议对新加坡是单向且绝对毁灭性的政策,因为并没有新加坡员工前往印度,且新印合作协议的“廉价劳工进口”,已间接导致国人失去收入来源。 因此,他也表明,若人民之声成为执政政府,为保新加坡人的最佳利益,也会希望能够废除新印合作协议,以确保新加坡人能够保住饭碗。 国家发展不能依赖人口疯狂增长 其次,他也谈到,若在新加坡作一千人人口增长的规划,是非常“疯狂的“,忆述已故总理李光耀,将新加坡人口与香港作比较,并理解他的做法是为了能够增广进国内的经济依赖,然而,他提到若要国家繁荣也无需依靠”人口疯狂增长“。 对此,他认为更有效的方法则为促进中小型企业,因为他们和我国七成的劳动力有关。他解释,如今遭遇疫情的打击,这些中小型企业正苦苦挣扎,因此他也希望政府能够为他们设立紧急基金,让他们度过难关。 总理的薪资削减七成,并重新调整部长和高级公务员的薪酬 此外,林鼎也提到新加坡是世界上最不平等的社会,他表示政府如果将不平等视为成功的象征,永远都无法消除不平等的争议,并以向来备受争议的总理月薪和清洁工比较,总理月薪值18万3千元,是清洁工的40倍。 这让许多20至30岁的国人经常感觉自己无法追赶高收入者的行列,并增加许多不安全和绝望感。…