Politics
Red Dot United calls for clarity and reforms on MediShield Life premium hikes
Red Dot United (RDU) has raised concerns over significant MediShield Life premium hikes, questioning the rationale and impact on policyholders. RDU seeks transparency from the government, calls for equitable subsidy systems, and urges reforms to ensure a fair and sustainable healthcare framework.
Red Dot United (RDU) issued a statement on Thursday, 28 November, voicing concerns over the planned increases in MediShield Life premiums.
The party urged the Ministry of Health (MOH) to clarify the rationale behind these hikes, which will rise by an average of 22% across policyholders, placing significant financial strain on citizens despite the MediShield Life Fund’s reserves designed to account for future claims.
The premium increases, set to be phased in from April 2025 to March 2028, will see some policyholders facing hikes of up to 35%.
These adjustments are coupled with sharp rises in deductibles, including a 66% increase for Class C ward deductibles for those aged 80 and below and a 75% increase for those above 80.
Concerns over sustainability and equity
In its statement, RDU questioned why long-time policyholders, who have consistently paid premiums to build the fund’s reserves, are now facing significant hikes.
These reserves are intended to support long-term claims, particularly for individuals with chronic conditions. The party called for clarity on whether the premium hikes align with the initial intent of creating a self-sustaining scheme.
RDU highlighted the disproportionate impact of these increases on middle-income families, who often do not qualify for substantial government subsidies.
Rising deductibles further compound financial burdens, as policyholders must now pay more out-of-pocket before receiving coverage.
RDU also criticised the use of property Annual Value (AV) as a criterion for subsidy eligibility, arguing that cash-poor retirees living in older private properties are unfairly excluded. The party called for an equitable subsidy framework that accounts for genuine financial need rather than property valuation.
Calls for transparency and accountability
In its statement, RDU emphasised the need for transparency in healthcare spending, expressing dissatisfaction with the MOH’s lack of clarity on projected government healthcare expenditure.
While National Health Expenditure (NHE) data includes public and private spending, it does not provide specific details on government spending for medical services.
Ravi Philemon, RDU’s secretary-general, remarked, “This triumph for humanity [living longer lives] must be matched by a healthcare system that gives people, especially seniors, peace of mind as they age with dignity, supported by sufficient and transparent government spending on healthcare.”
RDU called for the implementation of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to enhance accountability.
They also proposed increasing government healthcare spending to 6% of GDP, in line with international benchmarks, to reduce reliance on out-of-pocket expenses and frequent premium hikes.
Proposals for reforms
To address rising premiums, RDU suggested several measures, including:
- Targeting new costs toward new policyholders to protect long-term contributors from sudden hikes.
- Publishing historical premium adjustments and justifications to enhance predictability and trust.
- Regularly reviewing and adjusting claim caps to manage costs without requiring frequent premium increases.
Additionally, RDU recommended revising subsidy criteria to reflect income and financial circumstances rather than property valuation.
They also called for a fair appeal process for retirees who do not meet the current AV-based requirements but face genuine financial challenges.
Healthcare for all generations
RDU warned that continued premium increases risk depleting the Central Provident Fund (CPF) savings of many Singaporeans, threatening their ability to meet future needs and aspirations.
They stressed the importance of a balanced approach that ensures intergenerational fairness and protects both current and future policyholders.
The party concluded its statement by reaffirming its commitment to a healthcare system that places people at its core, advocating for policies that promote sustainability, inclusivity, and fairness for all Singaporeans.
-
Singapore2 weeks ago
Ministers silent on legal proceedings as Bloomberg and TOC refuse demands
-
Politics1 week ago
Progress Singapore Party accuses PAP supporters of harassment during Choa Chu Kang walkabout
-
Politics1 week ago
Progress Singapore Party volunteer files police report alleging harassment during walkabout
-
International2 weeks ago
Palestinian Authority suspends Al Jazeera operations in West Bank
-
Opinion1 week ago
Holes in Low Yen Ling’s allegations against PSP: No evidence provided from her volunteers
-
Singapore4 days ago
SM Lee Hsien Loong defends CECA, calls for integration and openness amidst political sensitivities
-
Politics1 week ago
Low Yen Ling accuses PSP of “twisting the truth” over alleged harassment in Choa Chu Kang GRC
-
Comments1 day ago
Netizens criticise K Shanmugam for sharing video on alleged Bukit Gombak harassment incident