Community
Fire breaks out at HDB Hub in Toa Payoh
A fire broke out today (2 October) around noon in the Basement 3 bin centre of HDB Hub at Toa Payoh Lorong 6. The Singapore Civil Defence Force quickly extinguished the fire and is conducting investigations. The building has resumed full operations, but the public is advised to avoid the loading and unloading bay in Basement 3.
A fire broke out today (2 Ocrober), at approximately noon at HDB Hub, located at Toa Payoh Lorong 6.
According to a Facebook post on the official page of the Housing and Development Board (HDB), the fire originated in the Basement 3 bin centre of HDB Hub.
The Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) was promptly activated and has since extinguished the fire.
Investigations into the cause are currently underway, with SCDF remaining on-site.
In light of the disruption caused by the incident, HDB has informed customers that they may experience longer wait times for appointments.
“Our foremost consideration is the safety of our staff, customers, and members of the public at HDB Hub,” stated HDB, “We thank the public for their patience.”
Reports indicate that three fire engines, a rescue vehicle, and two ambulances were deployed to the scene, with at least 10 firemen present to manage the situation.
An announcement made at approximately 2.05 pm confirmed that the building has resumed full operations; however, the public is advised to avoid the loading and unloading bay in Basement 3.
HDB Hub, the headquarters of the housing board, is situated adjacent to Toa Payoh MRT station and features retail spaces alongside an indoor plaza and a 33-storey office tower.
Community
WMP raises over S$1,600 in a day to help struggling family clear outstanding water bill
Workers Make Possible (WMP) raised over S$1,600 in a single day to assist a struggling family living in a rental flat. The family’s water supply was reduced due to an outstanding S$900 bill. The mother has been severely ill for months, unable to work, leaving her husband, who earns less than S$2,000 per month after CPF deductions, as the sole breadwinner.
SINGAPORE: A struggling family living in a rental flat had their water supply reduced on 1 October, as revealed in an Instagram post by the workers’ rights advocacy group, Workers Make Possible (WMP).
In an effort to ease the family’s burden, a fundraiser was launched. By the evening of 1 October, S$1,620 had been raised.
Of this amount, S$1,200 was transferred to the family to fully clear their outstanding water bill and address other urgent expenses.
The family, which had been accumulating water bill arrears for several months, was informed by SP Group that their water supply would only be fully restored if they paid S$450 upfront—half of their total outstanding bill of S$900.
According to WMP, the mother of the family has been severely ill for months, leading to her inability to work.
As a result, her husband, who earns less than S$2,000 per month after CPF deductions, is the sole breadwinner for the family, which includes young children.
With the rising cost of living in Singapore, the family has struggled to manage household expenses, leading to unpaid bills, WMP shared in the post.
After contacting SP Group, the mother was told the water supply would resume if half of the arrears were paid. However, she could not afford the required S$450.
This situation occurs amid rising water prices in Singapore.
The government raised the price of water by 20 cents per cubic metre this year, with an additional increase of 30 cents planned for next year.
WMP argued that despite government subsidies, many low-income families continue to struggle to cover their basic utility bills.
“Subsidies offered by the government don’t come anywhere close to alleviating the struggles of poor families in paying these bills. PUB earned about $286 million in 2021,” WMP challenged.
To support the family, Workers Make Possible organised a fundraiser via PayNow. In a 5:30 pm update on 1 October, WMP announced that S$1,620 had been raised.
Of this amount, S$1,200 was sent to the family to clear their water bill, while the remaining S$420 will be used to assist a young warehouse worker struggling with illness and rent payments, WMP clarified.
Arts & Cultures
Singaporean illustrator Lee Xin Li criticises unauthorised use of his mural in local food court
Singaporean illustrator Lee Xin Li was shocked to find his mural artwork displayed at a Bras Basah Complex food court without his permission. While Shifu Food Court apologised and attributed the issue to contractor oversight, and assured will removed the mural, discussions on Mr Lee’s Facebook post highlighted the broader problems of intellectual property theft, suggesting that silence on these issues only condones such behaviour.
Singaporean illustrator Lee Xin Li (李欣立) was shocked to discover that a copy of his 360-degree illustration, created for his client, Formula 1 Grand Prix in Singapore during the pandemic, was used as a mural in a food court without his permission.
Mr Lee criticised the unauthorised use of his artwork, stating that it was used without any financial compensation, permission, or prior communication.
“To further add insult, the generative ai tech was used to create some mangled mess to my artwork.”
According to Mr Lee’s social media posts, the mural was allegedly displayed at Shifu Food Court, located within Bras Basah Complex, an institution long associated with artists, writers, and members of the creative community.
Expressing his disappointment, Mr Lee called it a sad state of affairs, highlighting the irony of an institution dedicated to the arts committing “art theft,” using AI in a distasteful manner, and crossing the boundaries of client-creator relationships by taking his commissioned project without consent.
Mr Lee Criticises Bras Basah Complex’s Response, Highlights Public Promotion of Unauthorized Artwork
After reaching out to Bras Basah Complex to request the removal of the artwork, the institution responded via Facebook, issuing an apology.
Bras Basah Complex clarified that its Merchants Association is a volunteer group assisting merchants in fostering community spirit.
The association explained that the complex does not have a central management system, unlike modern malls managed by REITs, and that each shop is privately owned, meaning they have no authority over individual shop operations.
“As this happened in a private establishment and privately owned property, we had no preview and purview until its opening. ”
“Nonetheless we have reached out to the owner of this establishment and hope he will reach out to you to resolve this,” the group told Mr Lee.
However, Mr Lee expressed dissatisfaction, stating that this explanation did not sufficiently address the issue, particularly given the food court’s prominent public location.
He also pointed out that Bras Basah Complex had shared news of the newly renovated food court on its social media platforms.
Shifu Food Court Claims Unawareness of Unauthorised Artwork, says Interior Design Outsourced to Contractor
The food court later responded to Mr Lee’s Facebook post, claiming they were unaware of the unauthorised use of his artwork, as the interior design had been entirely outsourced to a contractor.
They assured him that an investigation would be conducted and that, if the claim was accurate, the mural would be taken down immediately.
Shifu Food Court also clarified that the murals outside the establishment were created by students and alumni from Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts (NAFA), and proper credit was given to them.
However, Mr Lee emphasised that the food court should have communicated more clearly.
While they clarified that the outdoor murals were by NAFA, the mural inside featuring his artwork was the contractor’s doing.
In a follow-up comment, Shifu Food Court issued an apology, explaining that they were unaware the mural inside included Mr Lee’s artwork and assured him it would be removed promptly.
In a Facebook post on Wednesday, Mr Lee expressed his gratitude to his followers for sharing the incident and raising awareness. He also hoped the issue would be resolved soon.
He noted that both Bras Basah Complex and Shifu Food Court have not reached out to him in other ways except on social media comments.
He further clarified that NAFA was an innocent party mistakenly dragged into the issue due to Shifu Food Court’s earlier social media posts, which credited all murals, including those inside, to NAFA.
Mr Lee reiterated that the NAFA students did an excellent job with their own murals, and their artwork was unrelated to the dispute.
Comments Highlight Broader Issues of Respect for Artists’ Intellectual Property Rights
In Mr Lee’s Facebook comment section, supporters and fellow artists discussed broader issues within Singapore’s art community.
Theatre artist Khoo Ee Hoon raised concerns about contractors assuming full responsibility for “borrowing” creative artwork without offering compensation or obtaining permission.
Another comment pointed out a dismissive attitude toward intellectual property (IP) theft, sarcastically stating that it’s not considered stealing if one claims to “borrow” ideas and “improve” upon them.
He emphasised that mindless and habitual IP theft and plagiarism are serious problems, suggesting that silence on these issues only condones and perpetuates such behaviour.
In response, Mr Lee lamented in the comment section that a mainstream media personnel once told him regarding an intellectual property issue he faced: “We didn’t know we needed to credit the artist.”
One comment suggested that if the contractor or subcontractor is not publicly named and held accountable, such practices will continue and become normalised.
Mr Lee responded by reflecting on the culture in Singapore, noting that, from his observations during his illustration journey, there seems to be a lack of accountability among parties involved in similar situations.
He emphasised that shame appears to be an alien concept for these individuals, who often proceed with the intent to avoid detection and feign ignorance if caught.
Mr Lee responded by reflecting on the culture in Singapore, noting that, from his observations during his illustration journey, there seems to be a lack of accountability among parties involved in similar situations.
One supporter suggested that Shifu Food Court should commission Mr Lee to create an original mural for the wall and have the person responsible for stealing the art pay for it.
In response, Mr Lee recommended that Shifu should seek a refund from the contractor, as some contractors hold the service provider accountable for ensuring intellectual property (IP) rights are properly cleared.
He also mentioned that he wouldn’t be interested in working on the mural, as the experience had tarnished his memories of Bras Basah Complex.
Daniel Yap, former publisher of the socio-political news site The Middle Ground, criticized Shifu Food Court in a Facebook post, stating that while they blamed the contractor, they are still clearly at fault for failing to secure copyright clearance from Mr Lee.
-
Comments6 days ago
Christopher Tan criticizes mrt breakdown following decade-long renewal program
-
Comments2 days ago
Netizens question Ho Ching’s praise for Chee Hong Tat’s return from overseas trip for EWL disruption
-
Crime2 weeks ago
Leaders of Japanese syndicate accused of laundering S$628.7M lived in Singapore
-
Current Affairs1 week ago
Chee Soon Juan questions Shanmugam’s $88 million property sale amid silence from Mainstream Media
-
Singapore6 days ago
SMRT updates on restoration progress for East-West Line; Power rail completion expected today
-
Singapore6 days ago
Chee Hong Tat: SMRT to replace 30+ rail segments on damaged EWL track with no clear timeline for completion
-
Singapore4 days ago
Train services between Jurong East and Buona Vista to remain disrupted until 1 Oct due to new cracks on East-West Line
-
Singapore4 days ago
Lee Hsien Yang pays S$619,335 to Ministers Shanmugam and Balakrishnan in defamation suit to protect family home