International
UK suspends arms export licences to Israel over humanitarian law concerns
The UK has suspended some arms export licences to Israel, citing a “clear risk” they may violate international humanitarian law in Gaza. The move, affecting components for military aircraft, helicopters, and drones, marks a break from US policy and raises concerns over UK-Israel relations.
In a move that could strain relations with the Biden administration, the United Kingdom has announced the suspension of several arms export licences to Israel, citing a “clear risk” that these arms could be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian law. This decision marks a significant divergence from the tightly coordinated policy between the UK and the US regarding Israel.
The UK’s Foreign Office revealed that a two-month internal review raised concerns over Israel’s conduct in the ongoing Gaza conflict, particularly regarding the treatment of Palestinian detainees and the obstruction of aid to Gaza.
Although no definitive conclusion has been reached on whether UK-exported arms contributed to the destruction in Gaza, the scale of the devastation and civilian casualties has prompted the UK to take this precautionary measure.
The suspension affects components for military aircraft, helicopters, drones, and targeting equipment, covering 30 out of 350 existing arms licences.
Notably, components related to the F-35 fighter jet programme are largely exempt due to their integration into a global supply chain controlled by the US, a point seen as a significant loophole by pro-Palestinian groups.
UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy emphasized that this suspension is not a full arms embargo and does not match the level of previous suspensions, such as those imposed by Margaret Thatcher in 1982.
Lammy described the decision as one made “in sorrow rather than anger,” stressing that it does not amount to a judgment on Israel’s actions but is rather a forward-looking measure based on the potential risks involved.
Israeli officials reacted with dismay to the UK’s decision. Defence Minister Yoav Gallant expressed deep disappointment, emphasizing Israel’s need to defend itself against multiple threats, including those from Hamas, which recently executed six Israeli hostages.
Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz also criticized the UK’s move, stating it sends a problematic message to Hamas and its backers in Iran. The decision comes as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu faces mounting political pressure following a general strike and public outrage over his handling of the Gaza ceasefire terms.
In his address to the House of Commons, Lammy explained that the decision was driven by evidence concerning Israel’s treatment of Palestinian prisoners and restrictions on humanitarian aid to Gaza.
The UK’s legal advice indicated that Israel could have taken more reasonable measures to facilitate humanitarian access and distribution, and it criticized Israel’s restrictive approach to dual-use items and the insufficiency of aid provided to Gaza.
The suspension is expected to complicate the UK’s relationship with the US, where the Biden administration and some Republicans close to Donald Trump have resisted similar measures, arguing there is no basis under international humanitarian law for suspending arms exports to Israel. Biden has faced pressure from the pro-Palestinian wing of the Democratic Party to leverage arms sales to force Israeli concessions in ceasefire negotiations.
In Europe, only Belgium and Spain have imposed arms embargoes on Israel, while Germany has refrained from doing so.
The UK’s decision is also likely to influence domestic legal challenges, including an upcoming case brought by Global Legal Action Network and the Palestinian human rights organization Al-Haq.
The Labour Party’s annual conference may see heated debates over the suspension, but Lammy’s careful calibration of the decision could help him navigate the potential backlash.
British arms exports to Israel amounted to £42 million in 2022, a relatively small portion of the UK’s overall arms trade, but the political implications of this suspension are likely to resonate far beyond the financial impact.
International
Singaporeans to require Electronic Travel Authorisation for UK travel from 8 January 2025
From 8 January 2025, Singaporeans must apply for an Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA) to enter the UK. The digital permit costs £10 (S$17), is valid for two years, and allows multiple visits of up to six months.
From 8 January 2025, Singaporeans travelling to the United Kingdom will need to apply for and obtain an Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA) before their trip.
According to a UK government press release, tourists from Canada, the United States, and 47 other countries and territories will be required to obtain an ETA before entering the UK.
This new requirement is part of the UK’s border security measures aimed at enhancing security and deterring illegal immigration.
The ETA application costs £10 (S$17), and Singaporean travellers can submit their applications starting from 27 November 2024 via the official UK government website or mobile app.
Once approved, the ETA will be digitally linked to the applicant’s passport and will remain valid for two years, allowing multiple short stays of up to six months per visit.
Applications generally take about three days to process, and applicants will be notified by email if their request has been approved or rejected.
The ETA is mandatory for all modes of transport, including air, sea, and land, such as via the rail tunnel between Britain and France. It is also required for transit passengers who are changing planes at UK airports.
However, the UK ETA does not grant entry to the Republic of Ireland or other European nations.
By April 2025, this requirement will apply to all visitors who are currently able to travel to the UK without a visa, covering over 80 jurisdictions globally.
According to the UK ETA website, the introduction of this system aims to strengthen border security by preventing illegal immigration, combatting organised crime, and identifying potential threats to national security.
International
Taylor Swift endorses Kamala Harris for U.S. President, calls for calm leadership
Taylor Swift endorsed Kamala Harris for president, calling her a “steady-handed, gifted leader.” In an Instagram post to her 283 million followers, Swift urged fans to research candidates’ stances and expressed concerns over AI-generated misinformation falsely linking her to Trump.
In a bold statement shared on her Instagram account, Taylor Swift has endorsed U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris for president in the upcoming 2024 election. The post, published shortly after the U.S. presidential debate on Tuesday night, positioned Harris as the candidate who would champion the rights and causes Swift holds dear.
“As a voter, I make sure to watch and read everything I can,” Swift wrote to her 283 million followers, adding: “I will be casting my vote for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz in the 2024 presidential election.”
Swift emphasized her support for Harris, describing her as a “steady-handed, gifted leader” capable of steering the country with calmness, in contrast to the “chaos” she associates with other candidates.
Swift’s post also featured an image of her with her beloved cat, Benjamin Button, nodding to comments made by Republican vice-presidential candidate JD Vance, who had previously mocked senior Democratic leaders as “childless cat ladies.” Swift embraced the label, signing off her statement with “Childless cat lady.”
Swift’s endorsement didn’t come without addressing misinformation. She referred to AI-generated images, circulated by former President Donald Trump’s campaign in August, falsely depicting her and her fans endorsing Trump. Swift expressed her concerns over AI’s potential for spreading falsehoods, calling it a key reason for her public clarification of her voting intentions.
“I need to be very transparent about my actual plans for this election as a voter,” Swift said, urging her followers to research candidates’ positions on issues that matter to them.
In response to Swift’s endorsement, the Trump campaign dismissed her support as further evidence of the Democratic Party’s alignment with “wealthy elites,” with spokesperson Karoline Leavitt stating, “There’s many Swifties for Trump out there in America.” Republican congressman Matt Gaetz also commented on Swift’s political stance, remarking, “I love her songs, but I want to live in a world where liberals make my art and conservatives make my laws and policies.”
However, Swift’s backing of Harris has garnered significant attention among her fanbase, with some already mobilizing in support of the Democratic candidate. The Swifties for Kamala Coalition, launched in August, has raised over $138,000 for the Harris campaign, further bolstering the vice president’s candidacy.
Harris’ running mate, Tim Walz, expressed his gratitude to Swift during an MSNBC interview, stating, “Her endorsement took courage, and that’s the kind of courage we need in America.”
Historically, celebrity endorsements have had measurable impacts on elections. A study from Northwestern University and the University of Maryland estimated that Oprah Winfrey’s endorsement of Barack Obama ahead of the 2008 Democratic primary earned him around one million votes. Whether Swift’s massive following, particularly among Gen Z and women, will have a similar effect remains to be seen.
Swift’s endorsement marks a significant moment in the 2024 election, highlighting the intersection of pop culture and politics. As the election approaches, her influence may yet play a pivotal role in shaping the outcome, particularly among younger voters and those concerned with women’s rights.
-
Singapore5 days ago
Singapore woman’s suicide amidst legal battle raises concerns over legal system
-
Singapore1 day ago
Minister K Shanmugam transfers Astrid Hill GCB to UBS Trustees for S$88 Million following Ridout Road controversy
-
Diplomacy1 week ago
India PM Narendra Modi meets with PM Lawrence Wong; Four MoUs signed
-
Parliament3 days ago
Minister Shanmugam rejects request for detailed information on visa-free visitor offences: Cites bilateral considerations
-
Opinion1 week ago
Singaporean voters and the ‘Battered Wife Syndrome’
-
Parliament4 days ago
PAP MPs attack WP Gerald Giam in Parliament over NTUC independence from ruling party
-
Politics1 week ago
PAP adopts SDP policies after criticizing them: Dr Chee urges Singaporeans to see through tactics
-
Food1 week ago
NTU stall food prices questioned after parent pays S$6.30 for meal