Politics
Tharman’s past PAP Stance on non-Chinese PM Draws netizens’ scrutiny over his new positive outlook
Netizens question Tharman’s shift in stance on a non-Chinese PM after his resignation from People’s Action Party to stand in the Presidential Election 2023.
While previously hinting Singapore wasn’t ready, he now suggests the nation is prepared amid his presidential campaign . This change in perspective, following his PAP departure and Presidential bid, has sparked online debate.
SINGAPORE: Last Friday (25 Aug), Tharman Shanmugaratnam, a former senior minister of the People’s Action Party (PAP) and a current contestant in Singapore’s Presidential Election, addressed the topic of Singapore’s readiness for a non-Chinese prime minister.
He affirmed: “Singapore is ready any time for a non-Chinese prime minister.”
Mr Tharman shared his thoughts during an election meeting held at Pasir Panjang Power Station, where approximately 650 registered guests from the public were present to hear his vision for the presidency, the Straits Times reported.
In response to a question from the audience about when Singapore would be prepared for a non-Chinese prime minister, Mr Tharman highlighted the significance of race in politics, drawing attention to former United States president Barack Obama’s discussions on the matter.
“They look at people in totality… Singapore’s ready any time. If someone comes up who’s a superior candidate for prime minister, the person can be made the prime minister. I believe they can,” he said.
He added that Singaporeans today, compared with 40 or 50 years ago, look at all factors, not just race.
The 66-year-old noted that this shift in perspective is indicative of Singapore’s societal advancement over the past few decades.
Speaking at SG50+ Conference on what lies ahead for Singapore, organised by the Institute of Policy Studies and the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy in 2015, Mr Tharman then said it is a matter of time before Singapore gets a non-Chinese prime minister.
“It seems to me inevitable that at some point, a minority prime minister – Indian, Malay, Eurasian, or some mixture – is going to be a feature of the political landscape.
“We’ve got a meritocracy, it is an open system,” he said yesterday, noting that people share experiences like national service and are educated largely in English, and that the common space is expanding.
But he does not see himself taking on the job, he said when replying to Washington Post columnist Fareed Zakaria, who had asked whether Singapore could see an Indian prime minister.
Netizens express bewilderment over Mr Tharman’s change in position
The alteration in Mr Tharman’s stance, subsequent to his departure from the PAP and entry into the Presidential race, has elicited a diverse range of responses from netizens.
When commenting on mainstream media platforms such as The Straits Times, Mothership, and CNA’s Facebook posts, numerous netizens have highlighted that the readiness of ordinary Singaporeans has been apparent for quite some time, despite assertions to the contrary by leaders of the ruling party.
Some have raised the question of why Mr Tharman did not engage in these arguments with his former colleagues while he was still a member of the PAP.
A netizen underscored that, in reality, Singaporeans were prepared for Mr Tharman to assume the role of Prime Minister years ago.
Echoing the same sentiment, another netizen asserted that Singaporeans have consistently supported the “most capable person”, “regardless of race or gender, who has the best interest of Singapore and Singaporeans at heart”.
A comment expressed his confusion by pointing out that when Singaporeans previously urged Mr Tharman to assume the role of PM, he declined and pursued the Presidency instead.
The comment then highlighted Mr Tharman’s recent statement about people being prepared for a non-Chinese Prime Minister, which led them to question the consistency of Mr Tharman’s position.
Netizens want Tharman to “return to cabinet”
Expressing their strong belief in Mr. Tharman’s leadership prowess, certain netizens have called for his reentry into the cabinet.
These individuals view his capabilities as highly valuable in formulating policies that directly address the needs of Singaporeans and enabling him to sustain his impactful contributions.
Netizens question why did Mr Tharman not address non-Chinese PM issue with PAP colleagues earlier?
Concurrently, several comments have raised questions about Mr Tharman’s approach regarding his PAP colleagues’ sentiments regarding Singapore’s readiness for a non-Chinese Prime Minister.
In parallel discussions, certain comments have recollected instances where Mr. Tharman’s previous colleagues, including Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat, have expressed the viewpoint that a segment of Singaporeans might still be unprepared for a Prime Minister from a minority racial background.
Certain netizens have engaged in contemplation regarding whether the ruling party, PAP, might be hesitant about a non-Chinese PM.
This has prompted them to question why, during that period, Mr Tharman did not voice his perspective in opposition to his PAP colleagues.
Prominent Singaporean activist and independent journalist Kirsten Han has drawn attention to the alteration in the narrative.
She has raised the question of Mr Tharman’s stance when his PAP colleagues were asserting that Singapore wasn’t prepared for a non-Chinese Prime Minister.
“Where was he when they amended the Constitution the last time to create a reserved presidential election because supposedly Singaporeans don’t vote for minority candidates otherwise?”
“Suddenly we are all perfectly capable of voting for a minority candidate, we’re ready for a non-Chinese PM, and Tharman has always been independent-minded.”
Singaporeans prefer Tharman as the next PM
It’s noteworthy that a considerable number of Singaporeans hold the view that Mr Tharman’s outstanding qualifications and extensive experience not only qualify him, but even potentially position him as “overqualified” for the role of President.
They see him as a superior and preferred choice to become the next Prime Minister of Singapore, who can effectively guide the country through the current period of uncertainty and challenges it is facing.
A survey by market research consultancy Blackbox in 2016 showed that 69 per cent of respondents would support Mr Tharman as a candidate to be prime minister.
Regrettably, Mr Tharman has ruled out the possibility of assuming the role of PM at that time.
In a recent exclusive interview with CNA, Mr Tharman once again refuted the perspective that he is “overqualified” for the position of President.
“All the experience that I’ve built up in government, in politics on the ground and internationally is going to be absolutely useful,” he said.
“This is not just going to be a ceremonial responsibility, it’s going to be an active responsibility, domestically, supporting initiatives on the ground.”
The ruling party’s stance on non-Chinese PM
The leaders at PAP have always taken the position that Singapore is not ready for a non-Chinese PM.
In 2008, Mr Lee Hsien Loong was asked at a grassroots event, in the light of Mr Barack Obama’s electoral win as US President, if Singapore was ready for a PM of a minority race, and specifically from the Malay-Muslim community.
Mr Lee said in reply: ‘It’s possible. It depends on how people vote, on who has the confidence of the population.’
“Will it happen soon? I don’t think so, because you have to win votes. And these sentiments – who votes for whom, and what makes him identify with that person – these are sentiments which will not disappear completely for a long time, even if people do not talk about it, even if people wish they did not feel it.”
Speaking at a ministerial forum organised by the Nanyang Technological University Students’ Union in 2019, Mr Heng Swee Keat in response to a question about the poll, said that while many among the 700 students who attended the forum were happy to have a prime minister who is not Chinese, this was not the case for all of Singapore.
“My own experience in walking the ground, in working with different people from all walks of life, is that the views — if you go by age and by life experience — would be very different,” Mr Heng said.
Nevertheless, Mr Heng said: “I do think that at the right time, when enough people think that we may have a minority leader, a minority who becomes the leader of the country, that is something that we can all hope for.”
Mr Heng at the age of 57, was appointed Deputy Secretary General of PAP in November 2018 and was touted to be the successor to Mr Lee Hsien Loong.
Soon after the pandemic general election in 2020 where PAP saw its votes plummet to 61.24% — down from 69.86% in the last election in 2015, Mr Heng threw in the towel as the would-be PM as he claims that he has too short a runway to take over from Mr Lee Hsien Loong.
As Mr Tharman, who was then 64, had been omitted from consideration by the PAP leaders and the press, the choice was limited to the fourth-generation ministers with top choices being Mr Lawrence Wong, Mr Ong Ye Kung and Mr Chan Chun Sing.
A point to take note of is Mr Tharman’s constituency scored 74.16 per cent during GE2020 — higher than any other PAP constituency. Mr Wong’s constituency scored 63.18 per cent.
Mr Wong was later revealed a year later, at a press conference as the leader of the fourth-generation team and successor to Mr Lee Hsien Loong.
-
Politics4 days ago
Tan See Leng and K Shanmugam threaten Bloomberg with legal action over GCB transaction report
-
Crime2 weeks ago
Singapore police did not arrest fugitive due to no request from China
-
Property1 week ago
Bloomberg: Nearly half of 2024 GCB transactions lack public record, raising transparency concerns
-
International1 week ago
Israel conducts large-scale military operations in Syria and seizes Golan Heights positions
-
Opinion4 days ago
Ho Ching defends NRIC as “digital name,” calls for practical policies over secrecy
-
Community1 week ago
Hougang knife attack: Dispute over medical claim reportedly leads to mother of three’s death
-
Opinion16 hours ago
Government’s backtracking on NRIC unmasking and the miscommunication excuse
-
Politics1 week ago
Parties may not display face of individuals other than party leader: ELD