Saturday, 30 September 2023

We are shifting our daily news to Gutzy.Asia Support us there!

Online petition calls for Committee of Inquiry (COI) to investigate Ridout Road saga

The recently exposed Ridout Road saga, involving two residential properties managed by the Singapore Land Authority (SLA) and occupied by Cabinet Ministers K Shanmugam and Vivian Balakrishnan, has stirred significant concern among Singaporeans.

This issue has sparked heated discussions, with many expressing apprehensions about the independence and credibility of the ongoing independent review led by Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean, who is a colleague of the ministers involved.

Following SLA’s confirmation of the residency of the two properties, the Secretary-General of the Reform Party, Kenneth Jeyaretnam, criticized the opacity of the auction process. He estimates the annual rent of such a property could be approximately $1.65 million, despite the SLA’s claim that the ministers’ rent exceeded an undisclosed guide price.

The Workers’ Party (WP), too, voiced concerns and announced that it had raised parliamentary questions about the case.

WP Secretary-General and the Leader of the Opposition, Mr Pritam Singh, has specifically called for a clearer explanation of why no press conference was held to address these allegations. He has also sought assurances from Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong that the Ministers did not exploit privileged information to secure the leases.

Senior Counsel Harpreet Singh Nehal, in an article on 26 May, also emphasised that the ultimate credibility and effectiveness of the government’s review hinge on two factors, which are full disclosure of all material facts and the perceived independence of the review.

Despite the ongoing review and a promise that answers will be provided in the upcoming July parliamentary sitting, an online petition has been initiated to urge the government to establish a Committee of Inquiry (COI) to uncover all the relevant details concerning the rental of properties at 26 and 31 Ridout Road by two ministers.

The petition, hosted on the ipetitions platform by a netizen named “Chris Chua,” includes a quote from Kenneth Jeyaretnam, who expressed scepticism about the upcoming parliamentary session’s ability to provide satisfactory answers.

Mr Jeyaretnam had emphasized his lack of confidence in receiving a transparent, comprehensive, and fair account of the issue in Parliament.

“I have no doubt that many MPs will make long speeches taking up the bulk of the Parliamentary session. A few inoffensive and vague questions will be asked by both sides of the house (for faux balance) and then an ad hominem attack will be launched on me from a place where the senior ministers enjoy parliamentary privilege and I have no right of reply. Then we will hear no more.”

As of Monday morning (29 May), the petition has garnered 487 signatures.

Netizens urged ministers or members from the ruling party abstaining from participating in the COI

In the comment section of the online petition, signatories expressed their agreement that an independent Committee of Inquiry (COI) is necessary, as opposed to relying solely on an independent review led by a colleague of the ruling party’s Cabinet.

They emphasized the importance of ministers or members from the ruling party abstaining from participating in the COI. The purpose of having a COI on the matter is to guarantee a thorough, fair, and impartial investigation of the issue.


One netizen commented that a review conducted within a majority PAP parliament can not be considered fair and impartial, and expressed the view that anything less than a COI composed of opposition members and/or retired high court judges would be seen as an attempt to cover up the issue.

“Trust in the government is built on government’s accountability and transparency. Therefore, I support this petition and hope the government do the right in restoring trust in the people.”

Another netizen highlighted the contradiction in Minister K Shanmugam’s statement of having “nothing to hide” and calling for an “independent” review, while PM Lee appointed a long-time close colleague from the same party to lead it.

One critical comment questioned the rationale behind renting a large state-owned bungalow, while ordinary Singaporeans are struggling with ever-increasing cost of almost everything and a depreciating leased HDB for a roof over their heads.

Netizen suggested that COI must comprise former Judiciary High Court Judges who are independent

A comment emphasized the importance of having former Judiciary High Court Judges as members of the proposed COI who are independent and not influenced by any political party, particularly the PAP.

Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Latest posts

Election surprises and certainties: Dissecting Tharman’s presidential win

In the 2023 Presidential Election, Mr. Tharman Shanmugaratnam secured a stunning 70.4% landslide victory, surprising many, including himself. Despite expectations that TKL would win the opposition votes, voters from both camps showed a preference for Tharman's charisma and perceived competency. As Singapore reflects on the outcome, questions arise about the election's fairness and the real implications of Tharman's dominant win.

Volunteer as a Polling and Counting Agent for Singapore’s 2023 Presidential Election

For the upcoming Singapore Presidential Election on 1st September, members of the civil society have spearheaded an initiative to strengthen our democratic fabric. We invite committed individuals to join us as Polling and Counting Agents, standing together for a transparent, fair, and just election. This vote counting exercise, organized by members of civil society, is not specifically in support of Mr Tan Kin Lian, a candidate in the upcoming Presidential Election. It's an exercise in active citizenry. Nonetheless, Mr Tan endorses this initiative, which hinges on his candidacy, championing transparency, and has given permission for the results to be shared publicly.

Reflections from the Centenary: The Legacy of LKY and Singapore’s Future

Gilbert Goh reflects on the LKY centenary event: an inspiring showcase of a leader's global legacy juxtaposed against current challenges, urging Singapore to continue its path of progress.

Lim Tean advocates for Tan Kin Lian: A visionary leader for Singapore’s Presidency

In his speech at Mr Tan Kin Lian's launch of his presidential bid, Mr Lim Tean passionately championed the need for a truly Independent President. Highlighting Mr Tan Kin Lian's unique credentials and genuine concern for the wellbeing of Singaporeans, the Peoples Voice leader emphasized the pressing challenges of rising living costs and job insecurities faced by the public. Mr Lim depicted Mr Tan Kin Lian as a beacon of hope for the nation, advocating for a leader who genuinely understands and represents the people’s aspirations.

Tan Jee Say endorses Tan Kin Lian for President: A courageous, genuine, and humble...

In advocating for a truly representative leader, Tan Jee Say underscored Tan Kin Lian's humility, courage, and genuine dedication. Highlighting the pressing need for restored public trust and effective independence, Tan Jee Say emphasized that Tan Kin Lian, as the 'People's President', would bring back hope to Singaporeans and champion true democracy

Tan Kin Lian’s pledge: Rekindling unity and charting a vigorous future for Singapore

In the press conference to announce his bid for the Singapore presidency, Tan Kin Lian emphasizes safeguarding Singapore's reserves and strengthening public service integrity. Drawing on his 30-year leadership at NTUC Income, he envisions a future with affordable living, accessible housing, and job stability, pledging collaboration with the government for a united nation.

Strengthening Singapore’s political foundations: A call to action by Leong Mun Wai on Singapore’s...

Leong Mun Wai urges Singaporeans to strengthen political checks and balances, emphasizing, 'The best is yet to be for Singapore if we dare to make the right decision in upcoming elections.

Trending posts