Connect with us

Comments

Construction firm to be charged for unauthorised drainage works that caused Pasir Ris flood; netizens question why authorities didn’t monitor contractors

Published

on

National water agency PUB will be filing charges against construction company Samwoh for unauthorised drainage works that resulted a prolonged flood in Pasir Ris last month.

It said that Samwoh will be charged under the Sewerage and Drainage Act, and those found guilty can be fined up to S$50,000 for works affecting the storm-water drainage system, and up to S$20,000 for unauthorised alteration of the system.

PUB said on Saturday (11 September) that the junction of Tampines Avenue 10 and Pasir Ris Drive 12 is not a flood-prone area, but due to actions by Samwoh, it has resulted in a flood that made cars and motorists be stranded at the junction for almost two hours on 20 August.

It was reported that a 200m section of the traffic junction was flood, with water reaching up to knee-level in some places. 13 vehicles were partially submerged and a few motorists required assistance to evacuate their vehicles. At least one person was taken to the hospital.

PUB explained in its statement that the drainage system there was “more than adequate to cope with the rainfall intensity” on that day.

During heavy rainfall, water is diverted to Sungei Api Api, a canal about 1km from the flood junction, and sensors revealed that it was only about 50 percent full on 20 August.

“This prolonged flooding was entirely man-made. It would not have happened if the contractor had complied with PUB’s regulations for drainage work,” said Yeo Keng Soon, director of PUB’s catchment and waterway department, about the Pasir Ris incident.

PUB’s investigations

According to investigations conducted by PUB, it showed that Samwoh, which was doing the road widening works along Tampines Avenue 10, had built a diversion drain that was meant to reconnect to the original drain further downstream.

However, there were multiple issues with the construction plan.

The contractor first blocked off the existing roadside drain with large concrete slabs. The diversion drain was not connected properly to the existing drain and partially obstructed by scaffolding, PUB noted.

The construction firm had also not gotten PUB’s approval for drainage diversion.

The authorised drainage works obstructed the discharge of rainwater into the downstream Sungei Api Api, causing water to stay stagnate at the traffic junction as it is the lowest point in the area, said PUB.

Due to this, Samwoh was instructed by PUB to fix the situation and remove all obstructions to make sure storm water can flow in the drain.

During a media briefing on Friday (10 September), chief engineer for drainage operations at PUB’s catchment and waterways department, Lee Cai Jie, said that when a road is widened, affected section of the roadside drain would have to reconstructed.

He added that contractors must get approval from PUB before getting started with any drainage works. The submission must include a Drainage Details Plan, which in Samwoh’s case would set out the proposed scope of drainage works, like the proposed alignment and sizing of the new drain.

If this gets approval, PUB will issue a clearance certificate which says that, before carrying out works to alter the current drainage system, the contractor must also submit a method statement on how and when it plans to do it.

“Samwoh had submitted the Drainage Detailed Plan and obtained approval from PUB. But they failed to follow up with the method statement for PUB’s approval before proceeding with the drainage modification works at its worksite,” said Mr Lee.

PUB’s Mr Yeo said on Saturday that the agency maintains a network of roadside drains, canals and rivers that move storm water into reservoirs or out to sea.

“It is imperative that our drains are kept free flowing, especially as we experience more frequent and intense rainfall due to climate change. This incident should serve as a stark warning to all contractors that any construction works carried out must not adversely affect the storm water,” he added.

Netizens react

Following this news, online users were quick to express that contractors should not always be the person to be blamed. Penning their thoughts in the Facebook page of The Straits Times, they asked why the authorities didn’t monitor these contractors as it is their job to do so. Some even said that it is PUB who approved this contractor in the first place, as such questioning how are they saying now that the works carried out by Samwoh were unauthorised.

One user wrote: “Its easy to pinpoint, blame and sue the contractors but how about the authorities that award and supposed to monitor them.”

Others asked why didn’t PUB carry out random checks on the contractors to see if works are being done according to the plan. They pointed out that prevention is better than cure, and that inspection should be done in stages to prevent such thing from occurring.

Continue Reading
7 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
7 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Comments

Worries loom over speculative trends in HDB market as S$1M transactions dominate headlines

Four HDB flats at Bidadari’s Alkaff Vista estate recently crossed the S$1 million mark after reaching their Minimum Occupation Period (MOP). The surge in property agent visits prompted residents to put up signs to deter them. Netizens are concerned about speculative trends in the HDB resale market, particularly as properties in mature estates are viewed as lucrative investment opportunities.

Published

on

Earlier, it was reported that four HDB flats at Bidadari’s Alkaff Vista estate recently crossed the S$1 million mark following the completion of their Minimum Occupation Period (MOP), signalling the rising demand for homes in the centrally located estate.

These high-value transactions took place between August and September 2024, with the highest being a five-room unit that sold for S$1.2 million last month.

The other three, all four-room flats located at Block 106B and Block 106A, changed hands for prices ranging from S$1.08 million to S$1.17 million.

According to HDB’s website, another unit at Block 105A, a low-floor flat, was sold for S$937,500.

Property Agents Flood Estate, Prompting Residents to Put Up Signs to Ward Them Off

In a report by Shin Min Daily News, several residents have complained about being inundated by property agents.

Some residents have reported daily visits from agents, prompting them to put up signs requesting that agents refrain from knocking on their doors, as they have no intention of selling.

At least 200 residents have reportedly placed “Do Not Disturb” signs outside their homes to ward off these unsolicited visits.

According to residents, agents typically knock on doors during weekday evenings, but since the signs were posted, many agents have taken the hint and now leave brochures instead.

Alkaff Vista is a Build-to-Order (BTO) project consisting of four blocks, was initially launched between 2015 and 2016.

Prices for four-room flats ranged from S$433,000 to S$682,000 during that period, depending on factors such as floor level and location, according to PropertyNets.SG.

Social Media Users Fear Rising Housing Costs May Impact Future Generations

Public reaction to these million-dollar flat sales has been mixed, with many expressing concerns on social media about the rising costs of public housing.

Some worry that the trend of million-dollar flats making headlines could make it more difficult for future generations to afford homes.

One comment recalled that the government had previously stated only about 2% of transactions would exceed S$1 million.

He expressed concern for future generations, stating that even with grants, they may still need to pay more than S$500,000 for a new flat.

He questioned how Singaporeans can increase the birth rate while also ensuring sufficient retirement savings.

The comment referred to a recent statement from HDB asserting that public housing in Singapore remains affordable and attainable for citizens.

It noted that million-dollar flats made up only 2 percent of total resale transactions in the past 1½ years.

HDB also pointed out that these high-value flats primarily consist of maisonettes, executive apartments, jumbo flats, and five-room units with desirable features, such as prime locations.

Netizens Voice Concerns Over Speculative Trends in HDB Resale Market

A netizen even questioned whether the current HDB resale market has “become a lottery”, with some hoping to secure en bloc or BTO units in high-demand areas. “This island is one big casino!” he remarked.

Another echoed this sentiment, noting that those who pay over S$1 million for an HDB flat are often individuals who have sold their landed properties and downsized to single-storey flats for retirement, freeing up cash in the process.

Another netizen pointed out that some view properties in mature estates as profitable investment opportunities.

The comment suggesting that buyers are rushing to purchase properties there, hoping to cash in once they are eligible to sell after the five-year mark, potentially earning a fortune for the first owner.

He suggested that if the government sells flats to citizens who no longer need them, it should take the flats back at a reasonable price and resell them to those in need.

He emphasised that these flats should not be placed on the open market, as they must adhere to HDB regulations, noting that HDB properties are not private assets to begin with.

A comment expressed frustration and concern over the government’s allowance of high-value HDB flat sales, which they believe contradicts the purpose of subsidised housing meant for poor and middle-income citizens.

He highlighted perceived loopholes in the system, as rising prices make it difficult for some citizens to afford homes, even with CPF (Central Provident Fund) assistance.

One netizen propose implementing an income ceiling for resale flat buyers and recalling subsidies for those who profit from selling their flats.

The comment also expresses dissatisfaction with the current Minimum Occupation Period (MOP), suggesting that it is ineffective in curbing speculative trends.

Continue Reading

Comments

SMRT cleans ‘spotty’ train flooring after Lim Tean’s public complaint

SMRT addressed concerns about train flooring in a Facebook post, sharing photos of workers cleaning the fourth-generation C151A trains. The operator noted that this cleaning has been completed on most trains in the C151A fleet. Netizens pointed out the timing, as the cleaning followed a complaint from Peoples Voice chief Lim Tean about “speckled” flooring observed while riding the East-West Line.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Last Friday (4 Oct), SMRT addressed concerns regarding the flooring in some of its trains through a Facebook post, explaining that the surfaces may appear “dull and spotty” due to dirt accumulation trapped within the sealant.

The train operator outlined the steps being taken to restore the flooring to a cleaner condition.

Accompanying the post were photos showing SMRT workers cleaning the fourth-generation C151A trains.

After the initial cleaning is done, workers will then apply a fresh layer of sealant on the floor.

The cleaning process involves two steps: first, scrubbing away the trapped dirt, followed by the application of a fresh layer of sealant.

SMRT also noted that this process has been completed on most trains in the C151A fleet.

While many netizens expressed appreciation for SMRT’s efforts to enhance the appearance of train floors, some suggested extending cleaning maintenance to various stations.

One user pointed out the presence of thick dust and grime, particularly in high-traffic areas such as Orchard, Dhoby Ghaut, Little India, and Farrer Park.

The discussion also referenced a recent Facebook post by Lim Tean, the leader of the Peoples Voice (PV), who first raised the concern about the train floors.

On 1 October, Lim shared an image taken while riding the East-West Line, highlighting the “speckled flooring” he claims is a common sight.

“Doesn’t this look like a train in a third-world country? Has SMRT gone Bohemian, thinking that the trains they operate should exhibit a ‘natural wear and tear’ look, in line with their philosophy of not over-maintaining?” he questioned.

Lim further critiqued the privatisation of public services, alleging that corporate shareholders reap generous returns year after year at the expense of everyday commuters.

Lim’s post has since attracted over 220 shares, sparking further conversation about the state of public transportation in Singapore.

Continue Reading

Trending