Connect with us

Malaysia

Malaysia: Even residents of PM’s constituency have visited Muar centre seeking assistance, says MP Syed Saddiq

Published

on

KUALA LUMPUR, MALAYSIA — Muar Member of Parliament (MP) Syed Saddiq Syed Abdul Rahman in Parliament on Monday (26 July) shocked the House after claiming that residents from Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin’s constituency have sought help from the former’s representative office.

Quoting the Prime Minister, who gave the assurance that the government is “not going to let the people suffer”, Syed Saddiq said: “Today’s reality is very different from what he had described in his speech.”

“Honestly, I feel that he rarely visits (the people on) the ground, and that is why he does not know the real problems (faced by the people) at the grassroots level,” said the former Youth and Sports Minister.

Syed Saddiq said that there are “so many people” from Muhyiddin’s constituency of Pagoh who have approached his people’s service centre in Muar “asking for (electronic) tablets, laptops, and food baskets”.

He said that he is “not afraid” of providing a list of names of the individuals who had come forward to his constituency requesting help in obtaining such items.

A Parliament sitting, Syed Saddiq stressed, is not a session for MPs and the people to listen to a “special briefing”.

“Today, the average number of daily COVID-19 cases to date is 15,000. 200 deaths due to COVID-19 every day. Over 1,000 have committed suicide in just one year.

“Prior to the Emergency, the average (number of daily cases) was 2,000. Now, throughout the Emergency, it is 15,000 to 17,000 every day,” he highlighted.

Such alarming statistics, said Syed Saddiq, is clear evidence that in the seven months the Emergency period has been in place, the number of cases and deaths have only risen, contrary to the purported aim behind the proclamation of the Emergency.

“The Emergency has clearly failed,” he concluded.

The Parliament special meeting on Monday was the first time Parliament was convened since December last year. Prior to this, Parliament was suspended since the Emergency Proclamation in January this year.

Multiple factions of society — from politicians to legal practitioners to members of the public — have heavily criticised the closure of Parliament.

Many have also called for Muhyiddin’s resignation over the move — a move that has been branded by critics as an attempt to cling to power despite the people’s swelling anger and discontentment toward the Perikatan Nasional government.

Just days before the sitting on Monday, Syed Saddiq claimed trial to charges of criminal breach of trust (CBT) involving RM1.12mil of funds belonging to his former political party, Parti Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia (Bersatu).

The Muar MP was formerly the leader of ARMADA, the youth wing of Bersatu while Bersatu was still a component party of the Pakatan Harapan (PH) coalition alongside Parti Keadilan Rakyat and the Democratic Action Party.

He now leads Malaysian United Democratic Alliance (MUDA), a multi-racial and youth-centered political party.

Syed Saddiq was slapped with charges of CBT over an alleged withdrawal of RM1mil through a cheque without the approval of Bersatu’s top leadership at the CIMB Tower in Kuala Lumpur on 6 March 2020.

He was also accused of misappropriating RM120,000 of contribution funds belonging to Bersatu meant for the 14th General Election at the Maybank branch in Taman Pandan Jaya between 8 and 21 April in 2018.

If convicted, Syed Saddiq faces 10 years of jail and whipping, on top of a fine, under Section 405 of the Penal Code and punishable under Section 406 of the same Code.

The second charge, under Section 403 of the Penal Code, carries a minimum jail term of six months and a maximum of five years. Additionally, he may be subjected to whipping and a fine if convicted.

After making an appeal to the public to raise funds for the remainder of his bail amount, Syed Saddiq said that he had received RM715,573.77 from 9,836 individuals in 24 hours.

“I owe my life to Malaysia … I am forever indebted,” he wrote in a Facebook post on Friday (23 July).

He also shared a touching anecdote of an elderly man who visited his office to contribute to his fundraiser.

“I thought he was seeking assistance. It turns out that he wanted to donate RM100 to me,” said Syed Saddiq. “I felt like crying.”

He said that the court case against him will not deter him from building a prosperous and dignified Malaysia for all Malaysians.

“The more they pressure me, the more I will fight. No threats. No intimidation. No offers will ever weaken my resolve to put Malaysia first,” said Syed Saddiq.

The Star reported that Syed Saddiq has posted the remaining RM250,000 of the RM300,000 bail imposed on him for his case.

His lawyer Haijan Omar said that the MP had settled the remaining amount on Monday morning.

“The registrar confirmed that Syed Saddiq was not required to come (in person) to settle the balance,” he said.

Syed Saddiq’s case is fixed for mention on 10 September.

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Civil Society

29 organisations demand criminal prosecution of law-breaking police in Malaysia

A coalition of 29 organisations is demanding that Malaysia end the perception of shielding law enforcement officers from prosecution when involved in serious violations like torture and killings. Highlighting cases such as the disappearances of Raymond Koh and Amri Che Mat, they call for accountability through criminal charges.

Published

on

Activist Amri Che Mat and Pastor Raymond Koh

A coalition of 29 organisations is calling for an end to what they describe as a “policy” or perception in Malaysia that shields police and law enforcement officers from criminal prosecution, even when they are involved in serious violations such as death, torture, or human rights abuses.

These groups argue that law enforcement officers who break the law should be subject to the same criminal prosecution and sentencing as ordinary citizens.

The coalition points to several high-profile cases where police officers allegedly committed serious crimes, yet no action was taken to prosecute those responsible.

They argue that merely subjecting officers to internal disciplinary actions does not fulfil the public’s demand for justice. Instead, such officers must be charged and tried in open courts, allowing for transparency in the administration of justice.

Enforced Disappearance of Raymond Koh and Amri Che Mat

One prominent case cited is the enforced disappearance of Pastor Raymond Koh and Amri Che Mat. In 2019, the Malaysian Human Rights Commission (SUHAKAM) concluded, following a public inquiry, that both men were likely victims of enforced disappearance carried out by police officers from the Special Branch.

The government formed a Special Task Force to investigate SUHAKAM’s findings, but when the report was completed, it was classified as an “Official Secret” and was not disclosed to the public.

Recently, during a civil trial initiated by the families of the victims, parts of the report were revealed.

These findings supported SUHAKAM’s conclusions, asserting that the officers involved were rogue individuals acting independently. However, despite this revelation, no criminal charges have been filed against the responsible officers.

The delay in prosecuting these officers, even after clear findings, further bolsters the perception that Malaysia protects its law enforcement officers from the full extent of the law.

Assault on Ong Ing Keong

In another case, Ong Ing Keong, a deaf and mute e-hailing driver, was allegedly assaulted on 28 May 2024 by a police officer escorting a VIP.

Despite video evidence supporting Ong’s claims, no charges have been brought against the officer involved. This case has raised further questions about the government’s willingness to hold law enforcement accountable.

Failures in Investigating Police-Related Deaths

The coalition also highlights multiple cases involving deaths caused by police officers, where no significant legal action has been taken.

A coroner’s court ruling on 31 May 2023 determined that the fatal shooting of three men by police officers was not justified as an act of self-defence. Despite this finding, the officers involved have not been charged.

Similarly, in a separate incident, the High Court ruled on 1 February 2024 that the death of a man in Sitiawan, Perak, at the hands of police was homicide, yet no charges have been filed.

The coalition argues that these incidents contribute to a widespread loss of public confidence in Malaysia’s criminal justice system, particularly when it comes to cases involving law enforcement officers.

They stress that the government must act decisively to ensure that justice is seen to be done, by investigating, charging, and prosecuting officers found responsible for these crimes.

Concerns About Torture and Deaths in Custody

There are growing concerns over allegations of torture and deaths in police custody, with many cases seemingly underreported due to victims’ fear or lack of faith in the system.

The groups worry that if the public continues to perceive that justice is inaccessible, it may lead to increased incidents of violence or retaliation against police officers.

The Need for Clearer Laws and Specific Offences

The coalition believes that existing Malaysian laws, such as the Federal Constitution and the Criminal Procedure Code, clearly outline the legal obligations of police officers.

However, they argue that there is a need for additional specific laws to address violations committed by law enforcement officers, particularly in cases involving torture, illegal searches, or denial of legal rights.

They propose enacting special criminal offences targeting police misconduct to ensure greater accountability.

They further highlight the challenge posed by the fact that police misconduct often occurs in the presence of fellow officers, who may be reluctant to report their colleagues. This creates a culture of impunity within the force, making it difficult for victims to seek justice.

Recommendations for Reform

The coalition’s demands include the immediate investigation, charging, and trial of the officers responsible for the enforced disappearance of Raymond Koh and Amri Che Mat, as well as the disclosure of their whereabouts.

They also call for the prosecution of officers involved in the disappearance of Joshua Hilmy and Ruth Sitepu, based on findings from SUHAKAM’s public inquiry.

Moreover, the group advocates for the prosecution of the officers involved in the assault of Ong Ing Keong and those found guilty of homicide in recent court decisions.

They also call for the implementation of new laws to address police misconduct and for the government to take active steps to discard the perception that law enforcement officers are immune from prosecution.

The coalition urges the Malaysian government to demonstrate its commitment to justice by ensuring that all law enforcement officers who break the law are charged and tried in open courts.

This transparency, they argue, is critical to restoring public faith in the country’s criminal justice system.

The list of the 29 organisations in the coalition

  1. ALIRAN
  2. MADPET (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)
  3. Teoh Beng Hock Association for Democratic Advancement
  4. Association of Home and Maquila Workers (ATRAHDOM), Guatemala
  5. Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM), India
  6. Center for Orang Asli Concerns (COAC)
  7. Greenpeace Malaysia
  8. Global Women’s Strike, UK
  9. Haiti Action Committee
  10. KLSCAH Civil Rights Committee (KLSCAH CRC)
  11. Legal Action for Women, UK
  12. Migrant Care, Indonesia
  13. National Garment Workers Federation, Bangladesh
  14. North South Initiative, Malaysia
  15. National Union of Transport Equipment & Allied Industries Workers (NUTEAIW), West Malaysia
  16. Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM)
  17. PAYDAY Men’s Network (UK/US)
  18. Persatuan Amal Progresif Malaysia
  19. Persatuan Sahabat Wanita Selangor (PSWS)
  20. Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity (PACTI), India
  21. Sabah Timber Industry Employees Union (STIEU)
  22. Sarawak Dayak Iban Association (SADIA)
  23. Saya Anak Bangsa Malaysia (SABM)
  24. Singapore Anti Death Penalty Campaign (SADPC)
  25. The Workers’ Assistance Center, Inc. (WAC), Philippines
  26. Union of Domestic, Maquila, Nexas and Related Workers (SITRADOM), Guatemala
  27. WH4C (Workers Hub for Change)
  28. Black Women for Wages for Housework, US
  29. Women of Color/Global Women’s Strike, US/UK
Continue Reading

Civil Society

M’sia NGO urges support for Clare Rewcastle-Brown after US$110K defamation ruling

Malaysian NGO ENGAGE has called on the public to show solidarity with British journalist Clare Rewcastle-Brown, who, along with two publishers faces a total payment of RM455,400 (approx. US$110,439) for defaming the Sultanah of Terengganu. ENGAGE condemned the ruling, stating it sends a chilling message to investigative journalists exposing corruption in Malaysia.

Published

on

MALAYSIA: ENGAGE, a Malaysian civil society group, has expressed profound disappointment over the Federal Court’s recent decision to uphold a RM300,000 (approximately US$72,771 ) defamation judgment against Clare Rewcastle-Brown, the investigative journalist known for her pivotal role in exposing the 1MDB scandal.

The court’s ruling, delivered on 10 September, held Rewcastle-Brown liable for defamation due to a mistaken identity error that had since been rectified, casting a shadow on the safety of investigative journalism in Malaysia.

In light of this ruling, ENGAGE emphasised the broader implications for journalists seeking to expose corruption.

“This decision sends a chilling message to investigative journalists who exposes corruption that they will not be protected in Malaysia,” the group stated.

As part of the ruling, Rewcastle-Brown and two local businesses—Gerakbudaya and Vinlee Press—are now responsible for a total payment of RM455,400 (US$110,439), which includes RM300,000 in damages and RM135,000 costs and other incidentals (taxes and interests).

ENGAGE also shared a video message from Rewcastle-Brown on its Facebook page.

In the video, Rewcastle-Brown reiterated her disappointment that despite correcting the error six years ago, the court ruled that she and the two publishers must pay damages to the Sultanah.

She expressed her gratitude to ENGAGE, the Centre for Independent Journalism, and numerous other groups that support freedom of expression for their efforts in raising funds to help cover these fines.

To date, approximately RM305,667 has been raised through donations in the UK and through ENGAGE’s Freedom Fund 2.0, leaving a shortfall of RM149,733, rounded up to RM150,000.

ENGAGE has issued a rallying cry to the Malaysian public to show solidarity with Rewcastle-Brown and the local businesses affected by this ruling.

The organization highlighted the significance of Rewcastle-Brown’s investigative work, particularly her book, The Sarawak Report: The Inside Story of the 1MDB Exposé, which detailed the massive corruption scheme involving former Prime Minister Najib Razak and fugitive financier Jho Low, ultimately leading to the latter’s downfall and incarceration.

ENGAGE plans to keep the public updated on the fundraising efforts through their Facebook page and encourages potential donors to verify the information via Clare’s blog.

In closing, ENGAGE thanked those who have previously contributed and encouraged further support to help maintain Malaysia’s independent publishers, vital to a free press and democracy.

They provided the following banking details for donations:

  • Name: Engage Citizen Network PLT
  • Bank: Maybank
  • Account: 5512 7609 7331
  • Remark: Clare

RSF condemns Malaysian court ruling against Rewcastle-Brown

On 17 September, Reporters Without Borders (RSF) condemned the Malaysian court ruling against Rewcastle-Brown and the two publishers, characterizing it as part of a broader effort to silence journalists reporting on corruption.

Fiona O’Brien, UK Bureau Director of RSF, commented: “This case should never have made it to court. The accusations of defamation are nonsensical. ”

“The underlying agenda appears to be to silence Rewcastle Brown and warn other Malaysian journalists away from reporting on corruption.”

In a separate criminal case, Rewcastle Brown was sentenced in absentia to two years in prison in February 2024. She continues to appeal the criminal charges but has faced significant challenges in defending herself.

The British government has not commented publicly on her case.

RSF also noted that Malaysia, once ranked 73rd in the World Press Freedom Index, has dropped to 107th in 2024, amid rising political instability and a pattern of defamation suits against journalists.

Continue Reading

Trending