Following more COVID-19 cases linked to KTV lounges, the KTV cluster identified by the Ministry of Health (MOH) spiked from 12 cases on 13 July to 54 cases the next day.

MOH confirmed on Thursday (15 July) that 34 more cases were linked to the KTV cluster, which now has a total of 88 infections.

Earlier on Monday (12 July), the Ministry listed the KTV lounges that were involved, urging people who had visited those places between 29 June to 13 July to come forward for a free swab test.

Those lounges are:

  1. Supreme KTV (Far East Shopping Centre)
  2. Empress KTV (Tanglin Shopping Centre)
  3. Club Dolce (Balestier Point)
  4. WU Bistro Pte Ltd (Golden Mile Complex)
  5. Club De Zara Pte Ltd (Textile Centre)

Given the alarming rise in cases linked to the cluster, questions have started to swirl about how these stores could still operate given that nightclubs and KTVs have not been permitted to operate under the current COVID-19 regulations.

In fact, KTVs have been barred from operating since March 2020 as Singapore, like many other nations, shut down economic activities in response to the global pandemic.

Even as restrictions began to ease for various economic activities – like F&B outlets – a few months later following the end of the circuit breaker period, KTVs still had to remain closed.

Interestingly, according to information from the Accounting and Corporate Regulating Authority (ACRA), out of the five KTVs identified by MOH, three are actually registered as F&B outlets.

In fact, Club De Zara Pte Ltd is listed as a “fast food outlet”, while Club Dolce and WU Bistro are listed as a “cafés and coffee houses”.

Supreme KTV under Orchard Supreme KTV Pte Ltd, on the other hand, is listed as a karaoke lounge.

This begs the question: how come these KTVs are operating as F&B outlets?

Well, in August last year, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) and Ministry of Trade and Industry (MTI) announced a pilot programme for nightlife establishments to be allowed to reopen with COVID-19 safety measures.

The measures included only opening to residents and pass holders, ensuring that customers have tested negative for the virus before entering and that all customers don a mask at all times except when eating or drinking.

The ministries added that nightlife establishments not under the pilot programme could opt to “pivot to other permission activities” if they wanted to operate. They would also have to adhere to the COVID-19 measures.

That would likely explain why three of the five aforementioned KTVs are listed or converted as eateries according to ACRA – they “pivoted”.

In a twist, though, the pilot programme was actually delayed in January 2021 until further notice, amidst a rise in community cases.

The ministries said that the delay was to “prevent the risk of further community transmission and formation of clusters in high-risk settings such as nightclubs and karaoke outlets, which entail people coming into close contact for prolonged periods of time and in enclosed spaces.”

Nonetheless, nightlife establishments operating as F&B outlets were allowed to continue operating.

So, it does appear that at least Supreme KTV could have been operating illegally, while the other three are listed as eateries, which are in fact allowed to operate under current regulations.

To “pivot”, these establishments would have had to apply for various licenses.

As of May 2021, over 400 nightlife operators had received the Singapore Food Agency (SFA) food shop or snack counter license enabling them to temporarily pivot to F&B operations.

Beyond that, the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) grants a one-year temporary conversion for outlets that have pivoted to F&B operations, subject to conditions.

With all that, given the latest series of community cases and how these cases were infected, it raises the question of whether the authorities that approved the necessary licenses had conducted any investigations into the businesses before approving them to operate as F&B outlets?

Since November last year, the Singapore Nightlife Business Association (SNBA) assisted 34 KTV lounges in temporarily converting operations from nightlife venues to F&B outlets.

However, the SNBA noted that three of the venues listed by MOH as part of the new KTV cluster – Supreme KTV, Empress KTV, and Club Dolce – are not among the 34 nor are they members of the association.

Speaking to The Straits Times (ST), SNBA President Joseph Ong said that the three lounges did reach out to the association for help with applying for a grant to Enterprise Singapore in order to pivot to F&B operations.

According to Mr Ong, the three lounges ultimately decided to apply directly to the authorities instead.

F&B licenses of three KTVs revoked

Separately, the authorities have revoked the F&B licenses of three KTVs that had converted their operations. The revocation was due to breaching COVID-19 safety measures.

The three outlets are 3 Kings Pub in Lucky Plaza, DMAX in Golden Mile Tower, and Peony Garden Food House (also known as Club Diamond) at Oriental Plaza. The three outlets are expected to immediately cease operations.

The Ministry of Sustainability and the Environment (MSE) said in a statement yesterday that this is the first time that F&B outlets have had their licenses revoked for such a breach since the enhanced penalty framework was put in place in May this year.

“Unfortunately, a number of establishments continue to operate nightlife activities which are currently prohibited, including employing hostesses or permitting freelance hostesses to serve and drink with multiple groups of customers,” said MSE.

“Others have also flagrantly flouted safe management measures in the process.”

Subscribe
Notify of
18 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

MPs who didn’t utter a word in Parliament?

By Leong Sze Hian Former Minister never speak? I searched the Parliamentary records…

Hong Kong to distribute reusable cloth masks via post while Singapore requires residents to collect theirs via CCs

Singapore residents are expected to receive new reusable cloth masks, which have…

受收入和负债水平影响 六成国人未充分准备退休生活

调查发现,六成国人没有为退休生活做足准备,对舒适晚年生活不抱太大期许。 数字财务管理公司赛芙(Syfe)进行一个民调时,发现大多数国人多处于退休准备最高或最低水平。 贷公司于周三(4日)发布调查结果时指出,有关调查指数是根据1000名,年龄介于25只60岁国人对退休生活的方式和需求,目前收入、累积储蓄、储蓄率以及投资,还有资产权来进行计算。 有关的计算分数将分四个级别来衡量退休准备程度,即高、足够、低或非常低。 然而,此调查结果或许反映了国人收入差距的扩大,因为发现10人中有四人没有真正为退休做准备,只有将近三人准备有充分准备,而他们就占了总数的有66巴仙。 调查报告指出,大多数国人陷入退休生活准备就绪的两个极端,这可能是收入差距扩大所致,并可能加剧未来的不平等退休生活情况。 报告还指出,整体上,有60巴仙的国人没有做好退休的充分准备,69巴仙的人认为他们无法享受舒适的退休生活。 这并非首次有调查显示国人并未做好退休准备。 华侨银行曾在7今年7月的金融健康指数中发现,大部分国人不确定如何透过投资和储蓄资金来增加财富。 年轻一代负担少较易储蓄 然而,这似乎不适用于千禧一代。 在Syfe调查报告中,年龄介于25至34岁的人们,在保持储蓄率和较低的债务水平情况下,这群体的人们将可享有舒适的退休生活。…

Sengkang LRT trains stuck on tracks due to power fault

By Failrail.sg On Friday, more than one train stuck due to power…