Following more COVID-19 cases linked to KTV lounges, the KTV cluster identified by the Ministry of Health (MOH) spiked from 12 cases on 13 July to 54 cases the next day.

MOH confirmed on Thursday (15 July) that 34 more cases were linked to the KTV cluster, which now has a total of 88 infections.

Earlier on Monday (12 July), the Ministry listed the KTV lounges that were involved, urging people who had visited those places between 29 June to 13 July to come forward for a free swab test.

Those lounges are:

  1. Supreme KTV (Far East Shopping Centre)
  2. Empress KTV (Tanglin Shopping Centre)
  3. Club Dolce (Balestier Point)
  4. WU Bistro Pte Ltd (Golden Mile Complex)
  5. Club De Zara Pte Ltd (Textile Centre)

Given the alarming rise in cases linked to the cluster, questions have started to swirl about how these stores could still operate given that nightclubs and KTVs have not been permitted to operate under the current COVID-19 regulations.

In fact, KTVs have been barred from operating since March 2020 as Singapore, like many other nations, shut down economic activities in response to the global pandemic.

Even as restrictions began to ease for various economic activities – like F&B outlets – a few months later following the end of the circuit breaker period, KTVs still had to remain closed.

Interestingly, according to information from the Accounting and Corporate Regulating Authority (ACRA), out of the five KTVs identified by MOH, three are actually registered as F&B outlets.

In fact, Club De Zara Pte Ltd is listed as a “fast food outlet”, while Club Dolce and WU Bistro are listed as a “cafés and coffee houses”.

Supreme KTV under Orchard Supreme KTV Pte Ltd, on the other hand, is listed as a karaoke lounge.

This begs the question: how come these KTVs are operating as F&B outlets?

Well, in August last year, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) and Ministry of Trade and Industry (MTI) announced a pilot programme for nightlife establishments to be allowed to reopen with COVID-19 safety measures.

The measures included only opening to residents and pass holders, ensuring that customers have tested negative for the virus before entering and that all customers don a mask at all times except when eating or drinking.

The ministries added that nightlife establishments not under the pilot programme could opt to “pivot to other permission activities” if they wanted to operate. They would also have to adhere to the COVID-19 measures.

That would likely explain why three of the five aforementioned KTVs are listed or converted as eateries according to ACRA – they “pivoted”.

In a twist, though, the pilot programme was actually delayed in January 2021 until further notice, amidst a rise in community cases.

The ministries said that the delay was to “prevent the risk of further community transmission and formation of clusters in high-risk settings such as nightclubs and karaoke outlets, which entail people coming into close contact for prolonged periods of time and in enclosed spaces.”

Nonetheless, nightlife establishments operating as F&B outlets were allowed to continue operating.

So, it does appear that at least Supreme KTV could have been operating illegally, while the other three are listed as eateries, which are in fact allowed to operate under current regulations.

To “pivot”, these establishments would have had to apply for various licenses.

As of May 2021, over 400 nightlife operators had received the Singapore Food Agency (SFA) food shop or snack counter license enabling them to temporarily pivot to F&B operations.

Beyond that, the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) grants a one-year temporary conversion for outlets that have pivoted to F&B operations, subject to conditions.

With all that, given the latest series of community cases and how these cases were infected, it raises the question of whether the authorities that approved the necessary licenses had conducted any investigations into the businesses before approving them to operate as F&B outlets?

Since November last year, the Singapore Nightlife Business Association (SNBA) assisted 34 KTV lounges in temporarily converting operations from nightlife venues to F&B outlets.

However, the SNBA noted that three of the venues listed by MOH as part of the new KTV cluster – Supreme KTV, Empress KTV, and Club Dolce – are not among the 34 nor are they members of the association.

Speaking to The Straits Times (ST), SNBA President Joseph Ong said that the three lounges did reach out to the association for help with applying for a grant to Enterprise Singapore in order to pivot to F&B operations.

According to Mr Ong, the three lounges ultimately decided to apply directly to the authorities instead.

F&B licenses of three KTVs revoked

Separately, the authorities have revoked the F&B licenses of three KTVs that had converted their operations. The revocation was due to breaching COVID-19 safety measures.

The three outlets are 3 Kings Pub in Lucky Plaza, DMAX in Golden Mile Tower, and Peony Garden Food House (also known as Club Diamond) at Oriental Plaza. The three outlets are expected to immediately cease operations.

The Ministry of Sustainability and the Environment (MSE) said in a statement yesterday that this is the first time that F&B outlets have had their licenses revoked for such a breach since the enhanced penalty framework was put in place in May this year.

“Unfortunately, a number of establishments continue to operate nightlife activities which are currently prohibited, including employing hostesses or permitting freelance hostesses to serve and drink with multiple groups of customers,” said MSE.

“Others have also flagrantly flouted safe management measures in the process.”

Subscribe
Notify of
18 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Over 80 students scammed after middleman on Telegram group allegedly swindled their wages amounting to S$7,000

In recent times, Telegram chat groups have come under the limelight for…

长期护理工作压力大、负荷重 应改善看护人员培训和薪资

日前,发生一则不幸新闻:一名77岁失智阿叔不满疗养院男看护撞到他的床,一拳打向看护胸口,结果看护“火遮眼”,暴打失智阿叔,此举为男看护招来牢狱之灾,他为此被判坐牢12周。 这名看护来自菲律宾,名为拉莫斯(Bernado JR Perdido Ramos),案发时任职于新加坡报业控股旗下的旺年护理之家(Orange Valley)。他面对一项蓄意伤人的控状,在本月6日认罪后,被判坐牢12周。 法官指被告有违失智老人对看护者的信任,虽然对方打人在先,但被告没受伤却作出过度反应。 去年11月21日下午约4时许,拉莫斯到疗养院房间分发床单和枕头套,其间不小心碰撞到失智阿叔的床。失智阿叔当时在睡觉,惊醒后大声嚷嚷:“谁叫醒了我?”男看护不满他大喊,走过去问他想要怎样,失智阿叔接着一拳打向看护的胸口。 但是拉莫斯被打后且对老人还手,往对方脸上连揍四五拳,将对方打倒在床上。一名在房里工作的护士助理见状,立刻上前试图阻止,但被告却瞪了助理一眼,接着再打失智阿叔一两拳后才离开房间。 老人被打至的左耳受伤流血、左眼红肿。 这则看护暴打老人的事件,也引起长期和年长者看护业者和同仁的关注。看护界同行,乃至在家中有照看年长者的子女,认为这是起不幸事件。 看护者要懂得调适心态…

Two S'pore blockchain agencies join up to form Blockchain Association Singapore

Spearheaded by members from the fintech sector, co-chairs Chia Hock Lai and…

Nine Thai companies recognised as outstanding brands winners at the Influential Brands® 2018 Ceo Asia Summit in Singapore

Influential Brands®, a think–tank research and business organisation which identifies, engages and recognises “The…