About 18 years after the police raided a shop selling pirated CDs, a man who was part of the group that managed to give the authorities the slip was finally fined for his crime.

In 2003, the man evaded the police with his brother during the raid. Though he remained in Singapore, the police thought he had fled the country and couldn’t find him at his local address.

He only popped back on their radar 15 years later in 2018 when he went to the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority (ICA) to inquire about a passport application.

The man, Tan Hong Ying, was eventually fined in court on Tuesday (29 Jun) the amount of S$3,500 for one count of being party to a criminal conspiracy to sell pirated CDs.

He was initially faced with more than 50 charges under the Copyright Acts but these were withdrawn. The judge had considered that Hong Yin’s role in the operation was minor and that he stayed out of trouble since 2003.

Hong Yin, now 47, was part of a group of culprits dealing in the sale of pirated music and software CDs in Singapore, working for his older brother and leader of the group, Tan Hong Jin, for two weeks in early 2003.

Hong Yin was tasked to ensure that his associates didn’t steal from the store and to ensure that they close up properly at the end of the day.

Though he wasn’t paid a salary, his debt to his brother was waived in return for his work.

A second brother, 14-year-old Tan Hong Chyan, also worked for the group, earning S$60 a day ensuring that all sales were accounted for.

Another person accused is Heng Kian Huat, 38, who was designated as the “fall guy”. He was paid S$100 a day to act as the frontman of the store and be the one to get arrested during raids. He was compensated S$2,000 per raid.

The other two that make up the five-member group are 29-year-old Poh Wee King, the “computer boy”, and 57-year-old Quirk Song Kek, the delivery man.

According to court documents, Hong Yin was asked by his brother to take over for him at the shop during the day of the raid on 25 February 2003.

During the raid, which was part of a simultaneous islandwide raid of the syndicate, Hong Chyuan was found and arrested with two others at their store in Ang Mo Kio.

After the raid, the ringleader, Hong Jin, contacted his younger brother, Hong Yin, and asked him to go to Malaysia. According to court documents, Hong Ying explained that the police had raided all the shops and that they needed to “cool down” in Malaysia.

However, at the Woodlands Checkpoint, Hong Yin had went out for a smoke while his brother stayed in the car. Suspecting that they were about to be arrested, Hong Yin decided not to go with his brother to Malaysia.

He walked out of the checkpoint, bought a drink, and went home.

According to the prosecution, the authorities had believed that Hong Ying left Singapore that day in 2003 as he was cleared to leave the country with his brother.

Even so, they visited his registered address in Singapore but could not locate him.

Hong Yin, it appears, lived in Singapore in various addresses between 2003 to 2018. He was only arrested after applying for a new passport at ICA in September 2018.

Of the others who were nabbed in 2003, Hong Chyuan was given two years of jail while Poh and Heng were sentenced to 27 months in jail each. Quirk, the deliveryman, was sentenced to 42 months in jail.

The ringleader, Hong Jin, remains at large.

Netizens’ reactions

Netizens on Channel NewsAsia‘s Facebook page are tickled by the fact that the case involves pirated CDs – which are more or less obsolete now – as they took a trip down memory lane recalling the days of video and music CDs.

Several others, however, wondered how the man managed to give the authorities the slip for 15 years while residing in Singapore.

They questioned whether he had CPF contributions into his account all these years, or even if he had used an ATM.

Meanwhile, one person was baffled by how the authorities was convinced that he was out of the country.

Another person asserted that the authorities messed up on the operation, while another jokingly asked if the authorities would be fined for the 18-year lapse.

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

新加坡的前车之鉴:因少数精英集权终至衰亡的威尼斯

《海峡时报》前总编冯元良,在《南华早报》撰文,认为新加坡应以史为鉴,他提出800多年前的意大利城邦国家威尼斯,以商贸起家盛极一时,但晚期却因为贵族精英独揽权力,扼杀公民参与决策权,最终引致威尼斯的衰亡。 冯元良在这篇评论文章指出,首先,中世纪早期的威尼斯,之所以能崛起成为强大“海洋帝国”(威尼斯方言称为Stato da Mar),乃是因为威尼斯公民能对行政有话事权,以及可以分享国家的繁荣成果。1171年,实权总督的权力,被稀释下放给主要由商人组成的大议会。 遴选大议会成员的过程也近似民主制度。候选人提名者乃是抽签决定。提名人推举的候选人名单公布,威尼斯公民即可投票选出属意的候选人进入议会。 当代一项具显著意义的制度乃是“colleganze”,即以合股公司心事,来资助远洋商贸探险。商人发起远洋探险航程,而街上任何男性,都可以购买其中一小部分股份来牟利。 经济市场是开放的,任何精打细算的公民都可以从远行至摩洛哥和土耳其进行香料贸易的远航图利,也激发基层企业家精神。几乎没有任何官僚主义的阻,当时的威尼斯,成为该区域最大的商贸城邦国家。 那么,遥远年代的威尼斯,和今天的新加坡有何意义? 新加坡人有否足够发言权? 我认为,威尼斯的兴亡,有值得同样作为城邦国家的新加坡借鉴的地方。首先,除了大选以外,新加坡人是否有足够的发言权?如果国人对影响他们生活的政策有意见,他们的声音是否又被听到? 其二,新加坡的经济繁荣成果,有没有广泛、深入地分享给各阶层国人?如果不是,新加坡又该在不影响国家竞争力和成长前景的情况,解决这种不平等现象? 再者,即便许多保护政策都是出于善意,但这些保障和限制是否束缚了我们在面对21世纪充满变数的经济所需要的承担风险和创业拼搏精神?…

"Some improvement" in race relations among Singaporeans except in workplaces, says Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam … but do minorities concur?

While there has been a “slight increase” in the “perception” of racial…

Online users slam CPF Board for disallowing heart patient to withdrawn his own CPF fund; calls the Board “cold hearted”

On 22 November (Friday), the Central Provident Fund (CPF) Board took to…