Even that “little increase” in the rental rates would mean “a lot” to hawkers, said Makansutra founder KF Seetoh in a Facebook post on Monday (28 Jun), following the National Environment Agency’s (NEA) clarifications that the increase in hawker stall rents have not exceeded S$300.

The NEA earlier on Saturday (26 Jun) stated that the rental rates for hawker stalls have been “kept unchanged throughout three years”, adding that monthly hawker stall rents can be “as low as a few hundred dollars, or even S$1”.

The statement was made after Mr Seetoh posted on Facebook last Friday (25 Jun) regarding the announcement that hawker stall’s rent would be raised by 40 per cent. He proceeded to slam the NEA for raising hawker stall rents amid challenging times.

According to NEA, the renewal of tenancy three years later will be based on prevailing market rates assessed by independent professional valuers, which can be higher or lower than the previous rate.

“In recent years, rental revision upwards at tenancy renewals in our hawker centres have not exceeded $300. On the other hand, there have been rental revisions downwards of more than $300 upon tenancy renewals.

“It is misleading to look at percentage increases alone as a $300 increase from a low rental will appear as a large percentage increase,” said the agency.

NEA also pointed out that it had frozen rental increases from 1 April last year to 31 March this year due to the difficulties caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

The agency added that hawkers were provided with five months of rental waivers and three months of subsidies for table-cleaning and centralised dishwashing services, as well as the Self-Employed Person Income Relief of nine months for eligible hawkers.

In response to the NEA’s statement, Mr Seetoh took to his Facebook earlier today to emphasise that it is about “timing and empathy, not the quantum nor the earlier well-intended rent waivers”.

He also shared a letter received by a pair of hawkers, which indicates the amount of rental hike offered to them has gone from S$800 to S$1,100 per month. The date of the letter was censored but the year in which the revised charges would apply is “2021”.

Mr Seetoh noted that the hawkers now have to pay S$1,550 per month, adding that they have decided to close permanently when their term ended.

“It may not sound like alot to many, but the hawker said he will accept and ‘move on’ which really meant they will quit and close permanently when the term ended.

“That ‘little’ increase’ meant alot to the hawker. Both are now jobless and contemplating the next move,” he said.

Mr Seetoh went on to say that the price hike also affected the new assistant and trainee that the hawkers were grooming to take over and/or set up another outlet.

“Now, in one by-the-book policy swoop, two Singaporeans are made jobless. I don’t know how many more hawkers were affected by this rule this last 12 months,” he remarked.

Mr Seetoh previously slammed NEA for increasing hawker stall rents by 40% amid pandemic

NEA’s statement on Saturday came after the Makansutra founder voiced his concerns about raising the hawker stall’s rent by 40 per cent.

In a Facebook post a day last Friday, Mr Seetoh did not mention which hawker stalls are subjected to the rental hike, but include a letter by NEA informing a stall owner on the rental raise.

He slammed the agency for raising the rental rates amid challenging times, asking if this act of increasing hawkers rental rates by 40 per cent – whilst coming up with a campaign informing the public to pay more for food – is in line with world standards.

“Here we all are doing our best to #supportourhawkers, and there they are at same time raising the hawkers rent by almost 40%… Why oh why I ask. You may need to claw back to top up the national coffers but do your leaders even know it’s a horrible timing to do so now. This hawker had been languishing in sales this whole year,” said Mr Seetoh.

He asserted that although two people are allowed to dine-in, in accordance to rules set in Phase 3 (Heightened Alert) phase, the situation is not great for the hawkers.

This is because most people are buying things online, making it difficult for hawkers who are working offline to make sales.

“Lotsa folks are buying online and WFM, a seductive and convenient culture ingrained into us over the last year and many offline hawkers are left to dry out,” Mr Seetoh stressed.

“Two to a table with 3 turns at peak lunch hour is only 6 dishes n drinks, that’s just scratching at hope’s door. Top that up with this ‘professional valuers’ decree that rents must be raised now, it is another death knell for the #supportourhawkers movement,” he added.

Subscribe
Notify of
19 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

More than 10 elderly seen huddling over a kopitiam table celebrating birthday, flouting safe distancing measures

A video was shared on Facebook this afternoon (7 October), showing a…

PSLE issue betrays fact that Singapore is getting 'effete' says retired diplomat Bilahari Kausikan; Ho Ching questions MOE's decision

Commenting on the ongoing saga, academic and retired diplomat Bilahari Kausikan said…

骗订金被揭发 男子假冒建屋局承包商面控

涉嫌假扮建屋发展局承包商,到组屋向居民骗取装修订金的男子,今日(3日)被控上庭。 据警方文告指出,他们在去年3月至今年3月,13个月期间接到多起有关该一名男子假冒建屋局承包商,骗居民组屋要进行维修,因此向他们收取100元到300元不等的订金。 文告指出,调查显示,嫌犯并没有受到建屋局委托进行工程,至今已经有超过19人被骗。 勿洛警署警员是在4月1日确认了56岁嫌犯身份后,展开逮捕行动。一旦嫌犯的欺诈罪成,将可面对长达10年的监禁以及罚款。 不甘被阻,打人吐口水 此前,有网民也分享了有关嫌犯干案经过,识破和阻拦嫌犯进行欺诈,被嫌犯吐口水的经过。 72岁的网民罗锺柏(Low Chong Bak译音)于3月23日下午,在其脸书贴文指,看到一名中年男子上门,表示“在建屋局批准下”,会在隔天和团队上门维修天花板。 机灵的网民当时就询问嫌犯,“代表什么机构来的”,对方不答,但是晃了晃胸前的名牌。但是网民表示因为对方一直摇晃名牌,导致他根本看不清楚名牌上写些什么。 有关的事件发生在大巴窑。 网民当时拒绝了嫌犯的提议后,就见转而敲响邻居的门,还和邻居聊了约15分钟。这名76岁的邻居质疑嫌犯,因此询问网民嫌犯所言是否属实。…

泰国曼谷传出多次爆炸声响 至少两人受伤

泰国曼谷今日(2日)早上发生多起爆炸事件,包括地铁站附近,至少两人受伤。 警方目前已介入调查,泰国总理帕拉育(Prayut Chan-o-cha)透过发言人办公室表示,已要求警方立刻调查。 据悉,上午8时48分位于金融区的钟那席(Chong Nonsi)空铁站外面传出爆炸声响;接着,上午8 时50分则在拉玛九路(Rama 9)传出爆炸声响,两名清洁工受伤;上午9时 35分位于曼谷北郊的政府综合办公大楼亦传出爆炸声响,所幸无人受伤。 由于正逢东协外长会议以及多个区域会议,均于曼谷举行,泰国警方也不敢大意。 传出爆炸声响后,钟那席地铁站附近聚集了不少警员与媒体,甚至出动防暴小组处理疑似爆炸物,至少已有两个地铁站已关闭。 该引爆装置相信是一种犹如乒乓大小的炸弹,警方初步认定爆炸事件是为了要在高峰会期间制造混乱,使泰国政府蒙羞,但并未有制造大量伤亡的意图。 Bomb…