At a public forum on race and racism yesterday (25 Jun), Finance Minister Lawrence Wong said that Singapore has not arrived at a state where its people are free of racial discrimination, and it is for this reason that the group representation constituency (GRC) system is still in place.

He was referring to the several recent racist incidents which has appeared in the news lately. He said these racist behaviors have shown that Singapore has some way to go to move beyond race.

The GRC system was implemented in 1988 to ensure minority representation in Parliament. Under the system, at least one of the candidates in the team must be a member of a minority group.

“We have the GRC system to ensure at least a minimum number of minority legislators in Parliament,” Mr Wong said and added that he respects the views of Singaporeans who believe Singapore is ready to move beyond the GRC system. Nobody would be more pleased than leaders in PAP with such an outcome, he said.

“But we are not yet totally immune to the siren calls of exclusive racial and cultural identities. Neither have we reached a ‘post-racial’ state. Surely, recent events have, if anything, confirmed our caution,” he added.

Mr Wong further shared that policies like the GRC system would ensure that the majority wouldn’t abuse its dominance. The system also ensures that no party could prevail by narrowly appealing to any specific race and religion, he pointed out.

Critics: GRC used for gerrymandering and bringing in candidates under heavy weight politician’s coat-tail

Critics, however, disagree with the PAP government’s justifications, noting that the proportion of minority MPs per GRC has decreased with the advent of five-member and six-member GRCs. By having teams of candidates standing for election for GRCs helmed by senior politicians, the ruling PAP is able to use the GRC system as a means for bringing first-time new candidates into Parliament with little chance of losing.

Take for example, Major-General Chan Chun Sing from the SAF was inducted into PAP and ran for MP the first time in Tanjong Pagar GRC together with founding PM Lee Kuan Yew in the team during 2011 GE. In fact, the PAP Tanjong Pagar GRC team won with a walkover that year.

Oppositions have also complained about the heavy gerrymandering used by the ruling PAP together with the GRC system in creating unfair elections in Singapore. Take the case of Joo Chiat SMC – in 2011 GE, WP candidate Yee Jenn Jong came to within 1% of winning Joo Chiat. In fact, Mr Yee lost to PAP candidate Charles Chong by only a whisker of 388 votes. But in 2015 GE, Joo Chiat SMC was mysteriously absorbed into Marine Parade GRC, which had five times as many voters and had previously voted in favour of the PAP by a 13% margin.

Expressing his disappointment, Mr Yee lamented, “There is no clear justification for the changes. With the eraser and the pencil, the mighty (EBRC) committee has made the Joo Chiat SMC with such a rich and unique tradition disappear. It was a SMC from 1959-1988 and also for the last 3 GEs since 2001.”

“We have walked the ground tirelessly for four years since the last (2011) GE, in and around the SMC, week after week, sometimes even in scorching heat and drizzles. Residents whom I have met were looking forward to a good and gentlemanly contest again like what we had the last time. Some ‘wise men’ in a small committee decided otherwise, for reasons best known to themselves,” he added.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
119 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Clearing the Haze: Solutions at hand

“Clearing the Haze” is a feature series by The Online Citizen that…

Sengkang West celebrates 10th anniversary with carnival and promises of new facilities underway

Sengkang West marked its 10th anniversary this year with a carnival featuring rides,…

“Stupid” to advocate the learning of dialects: PAP’s new candidate once said

“It would be stupid for any Singapore agency or NTU to advocate…

“理解各界善意建议” 惟麦锡威称戴口罩仍不是最重要防疫事项

卫生部医药服务总监麦锡威副教授称,对于防范新型冠状病毒(前称武汉肺炎),戴口罩仍不是最重要的。 本月10日,有四名医生发表联署声明,呼吁全民若离开家门都要经常戴口罩,也应避免在有冷气的地方如商场或饮食中心聚集。 四位医生建议,所有人只要离开家都尽量戴口罩,“如果双方(健康者和感染者)都戴上口罩,可以说会比较安全,至少形成双重保障。” 对此,有记者在昨日(12日)的跨政府部门工作小组记者会上,询问此事。对此麦锡威理解社交媒体上确实流传许多来自各界包括医生的善意建议。 对于上述四位医生的声明,他表示尽管一些建议都很贴切,包括勤洗手等。不过人们必须记得病毒是通过飞沫(droplets)传播的,仍未有证据表明透过空气传播。 “且该注意你经常触摸的东西,例如你的手机,因此戴口罩仍不是最重要的(防疫)事项。” “怎能在知道他人有危险下,还保持缄默?” 据了解,联署医生之一科林托马斯(Colleen Thomas)还告诉《海峡时报》,尽管他们提出的呼吁与卫生部相违,不过她认为他们仍有必要发出警示,“因为不这么做的负担太大了。” “作为医生,我怎么能在知道他人有危险的情况下,还保持缄默?” 科林曾在2003年染上SARS病毒。她还有同事在不知情情况下治疗病患而染病,此后再传给母亲,较后母亲不幸病故。 事实上,跨政府部门工作小组领导,包括卫生部长颜金勇和国家发展部长黄循财,都曾呼吁民众不要抢购口罩,人们遵循医疗建议使用口罩。换句话说,即有不适者才需要戴口罩,而身体强健者,可以将口罩让给那些有需要者。…